Skip to main content
Log in

Police officer attitudes toward peers, supervisors, and citizens: A comparison between field training officers and regular officers

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article assesses whether police Field Training Officers (FTOs) display patterns of attitudes that distinguish them from non-field training officers. The analysis focuses on attitudes toward four important groups: fellow officers, immediate supervisors, top managers, and neighborhood residents. Interview data used were collected from Indianapolis Police Department (IPD) during the summer of 1996. Findings show that FTOs are more critical of their immediate supervisors and district managers than non-FTOs, whereas FTOs and non-FTOs hold similar attitudes toward their co-workers and neighborhood residents. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bittner, E. (1983). Legality and workmanship: Introduction to control in the police organization. In M. Punch (Ed.),Control in the police organization (pp. 1–11). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. K. (1988).Working the street: Police discretion and the dilemmas of reform. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979).Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. C. (1969).Discretionary justice: A preliminary report. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. C. (1975).Police discretion. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerner, W. G., & Patterson, E. B. (1992). The influence of race and gender upon rookie evaluations of their field training officers.American Journal of Police, 11(2), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerner, W. G., Speir, J. C., & Wright, B. S. (1989). An analysis of rater-ratee race and sex influences upon field training officer program evaluations.Journal of Criminal Justice, 17, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulaney, W. M. (1996).Black police in America. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, R. S. (2001). Supervisory styles of patrol sergeants and lieutenants.Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, M. M. (1985). How police officers perceive their field training officer.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 13, 138–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N. G. (1988).Joining forces: Police training, socialization, and occupational competence. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1977).Policing a free society. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarr, R. N. (1997). Patterns of interaction in a police patrol bureau: Race and gender barriers to integration.Justice Quarterly, 14, 53–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980).Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider, J. T. (1990).Field training police recruits: Developing, improving, and operating a field training program. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayeslip, D. W., & Cordner, G. W. (1987). The effect of community-oriented patrol on police officer attitudes.American Journal of Police, 4(1), 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg, F. (1990). The motivation-hygiene theory. In D. S. Pugh (Ed.),Organization theory (pp. 375–392). New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornick, J. P., Burrows, B. A., & Phillips, D. M. (1989).An impact evaluation of the Edmonton neighborhood foot patrol program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Reno, NV.

  • Hurley, K. J. (1990). The legal and rational basis for field induction training. In P. C. Unsinger & H. W. More (Eds.),Criminal justice induction training: The field training concept (pp. 3–18). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, G. (2000).The field training concept in criminal justice agencies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langworthy, R., Hughes, T., & Sanders, B. (1995).Law enforcement recruitment, selection, and training: A survey of major police department in the U.S. Highland Heights, KY: Academy of Criminal Justice Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. E. (1980).Breaking and entering: Policewomen on patrol. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. E., & Jurik, N. C. (1996).Doing justice, doing gender: Women in law and criminal justice occupations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCampbell, M. S. (1986).Field training for police officers: State of the art. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, J. E., Cosgrove, C. A., & Sadd, S. (1993).Community policing: The CPOP in New York. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, J. H. (1967). Uncertainties in police work: The relevance of police recruits’ background and training. In D. J. Bordua (Ed.),The police: Six sociological essays (pp. 163–252). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, W. K., Jr. (1977).Police: Streetcorner politicians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauline, E. A., III, Myers, S. M., & Worden, R. E. (2000). Police culture, individualism, and community policing: Evidence from two police departments.Justice Quarterly, 17, 575–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, R. (1992).The politics of the police. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, A. J., Jr. (1971).The police and the public. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuss-Ianni, E., & Ianni, F. (1983). Street cops and management cops: Two cultures of policing, in M. Punch (Ed.),Control in the police organization (pp. 251–274). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P., Berk, R., & Eidson, B. (1974).The roots of urban discontent: Public policy, municipal institutions, and the ghetto. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, J. (1973).City police. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. H. (1966).Justice without trial: Law enforcement in a democratic society. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. H., & Gray, T. C. (1975).Police in America. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawbridge, P., & Strawbridge, D. (1990).A networking guide to recruitment, selection,and probationary training in major departments of the United States of America. Unpublished manuscript, John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

  • Unsinger, P. C., & More, H. W. (1990).Criminal justice induction training: The field training concept. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1973). Observations on the making of policemen.Human Organization, 32, 407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1974). Working the street: A developmental view of police behavior. In H. Jacob (Ed.),The potential of reform of criminal justice (pp. 83–130). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1975). Police socialization: A longitudinal examination of job attitudes in an urban police department.Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1976). Break in: Socialization to work. In R. Dubin (Ed.),Handbook of work, organization, and society (pp. 67–130). Skokie, IL: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1983). The boss: First-line supervision in an American police agency. In M.

  • Webb, F. (1993). National survey.Field Training Quarterly, 7(1), 16–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, W. A. (1970).Violence and the police: A sociological study of law, custom and morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (1972). A perspective on police professionalization.Law & Society Review, 7. 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1968).The variety of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worden, R. E. (1990). A badge and a baccalaureate: Policies, hypotheses, and further evidence.Justice Quarterly, 7, 565–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden, A. P. (1993). The attitudes of women and men in policing: Testing conventional and contemporary wisdom.Criminology, 31, 203–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worden, R. E. (1995). Police officers’ belief system: A framework for analysis.American Journal of Police, 14(1), 49–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wycoff, M. A., & d Skogan, W. G. (1994). Community policing in Madison: An analysis of implementation and impact. In D. P. Rosenbaum (Ed.),The challenge of community policing: Testing the promises (pp. 75–91). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunker, R. M. (1977).Police field training: The analysis of a socialization process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Y. Sun.

Additional information

This manuscript was based on data collected by the Project on Policing Neighborhoods. The project was supported by Grant No. 95-IJ-CX-0071 by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice and was directed by Stephen D. Mastrofski, Roger B. Parks, Albert J. Reiss, Jr., and Robert E. Worden. Points of views are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The author would like to thank Ruth Triplett, Brian Payne, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, I.Y. Police officer attitudes toward peers, supervisors, and citizens: A comparison between field training officers and regular officers. Am J Crim Just 27, 69–83 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02898971

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02898971

Keywords

Navigation