Skip to main content

Effects of inclusive vs. exclusive language on evaluations of the counselor

Sex Roles volume 34, pages 407–418 (1996)Cite this article

Abstract

This study examined the effects of exclusive vs. inclusive language (using generic pronouns to describe both genders as opposed to using more encompassing terminology such as “she or he”) on evaluations of a counselor. After reading a counseling session transcript in which language style and counselor gender were manipulated, 88 female and 44 male college students (80% White, 6% African American, 4% Alaska Native, 2% Asian American, and 3% Hispanic) completed several instruments assessing their perceptions and expectations about the counselor, as well as their sex-role ideology. Results indicated that language style affected evaluations, with all participants expressing less willingness to see the counselors using exclusive language and rating them as more sexist. The impact of exclusive language was most evident with female and feminist participants with these participants expressing less confidence in counselors using exclusive language. Results also revealed that participants were more willing to see a same-gender counselor and rated such counselors as more expert. Given these results, counselors should be aware of their language style and the possible impact it may have on clients, particularly female and feminist clients, and make any needed changes to lessen the possibility of negatively affecting their clients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1977).Guidelines for nonsexist language in APA journals. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1994).Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blier, M. J., Atkinson, D. R., & Geer, C. A. (1987). Effect of client gender and counselor gender and sex roles on willingness to see the counselor.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T. F., Begley, P., McCown, D., & Weise, B. (1975). When counselors are heard but not seen: Initial impact of physical attractiveness.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4, 273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, T. F., & Kehr, J. (1978). Influence of nonprofessional counselors' physical attractiveness and sex on perceptions of counselor behavior.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 336–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, J. D., & Schmidt, L. D. (1983). Development and validation of revisions in the Counselor Rating Form.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHeer, N. D., Wampold, B. E., & Freund, R. D. (1992). Do sex-typed and androgynous subjects prefer counselors on the basis of gender or effectiveness? They prefer the best.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epperson, D. L., & Pecnik, J. A. (1984, August).Counselor Rating Form-Short Version: A validation and comparative study. Paper presented at the 92nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association.

  • Gastil, J. (1990). Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics.Sex Roles, 23, 629–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, K., & Rubin, D. L. (1991). Effects of gender inclusive/exclusive language in religious discourse.Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10, 81–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. L., Atkinson, D. R., & Johnson, M. E. (1987). Effects of sexual attitude and sex similarity on perceptions of the counselor.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 322–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, M. B., & Insko, W. R., Jr. (1985). Use of nonsexist pronouns as a function of one's feminist orientation.Sex Roles, 13, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. E., & Holland, A. L. (1986). Measuring clients' expectations: The 15 Personal Problems Inventory.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 19, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalin, R., & Tilby, P. J. (1978). Development and validation of a Sex-Role Ideology Scale.Psychological Reports, 42, 731–738.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaCrosse, M. B. (1980). Perceived counselor social influence and counseling outcomes: Validity of the Counselor Rating Form.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 320–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, K. N., & Walsh, W. B. (1980). Effects of value-communication style and similarity of values on counselor evaluation.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, D. G. (1980). Psychology, prescriptive grammar, and the pronoun problem.American Psychologist, 35, 444–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martyna, W. (1978). What does “He” mean? Use of the generic masculine.Journal of Communication, 28, 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martyna, W. (1980). Beyond the “He/Man” approach: The case for nonsexist language.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5, 482–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, K., & Kristiansen, C. M. (1987). The effect of sexist attitudes and social structure on the use of sex-biased pronouns.The Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 395–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMinn, M. R., Lindsay, S. F., Hannum, L. E., & Troyer, P. K. (1990). Does sexist language reflect personal characteristics?Sex Roles, 23, 389–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. (1978). Sex bias in language use: “Neutral” pronouns that aren't.American Psychologist, 33, 1032–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. L., & Greene, K. L. (1991). Effects of biological and psychological gender, age cohort, and interviewer gender on attitudes toward gender-inclusive/exclusive language.Sex Roles, 24, 391–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniezek, J. A., & Jazwinski, C. H. (1986). Gender bias in English: In search of fair language.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 642–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subich, L. M. (1983). Expectancies for counselors as a function of counselor gender specification and subject sex.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 421–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley, H. E. A., & Harris, D. J. (1976). Client expectations for counseling.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 173–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon, S. A. (1989). He/she/they/it?: Implied sexism in speech and print.Journal of Counseling and Development, 68, 114–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanico, B. J., & Hardin, S. I. (1985). Relation of type of problem and expectations of counselor knowledge and understanding to students' gender preferences for counselors.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, 99508, Anchorage, AK, USA

    Mark E. Johnson & Seana Dowling-Guyer

Authors
  1. Mark E. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seana Dowling-Guyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, M.E., Dowling-Guyer, S. Effects of inclusive vs. exclusive language on evaluations of the counselor. Sex Roles 34, 407–418 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547809

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547809

Keywords

  • College Student
  • Social Psychology
  • Counseling Session
  • Male College
  • Affected Evaluation