Skip to main content
Log in

Intimacy in same-sex friendships

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three studies were conducted to evaluate the significance of the finding that females are more disclosing in their same-sex friendships than are males. No support was found for the suggestion that males feel just as close to their same-sex friends as do females. However, there was support for a developmental contention that during adolescence both sexes expect to become more disclosing in their other-sex friendships in adulthood, and that the spousal relationship should be the most intimate. Further, both sexes, whether in the United States or Hungary, believe females are more disclosing of their feelings and problems than are males. Although males do seem to wish to be more disclosing, they expect to be more open mainly in other-sex friendships. The majority of adults profess little concern about disclosure in same-sex friendships, but women report feeling more at ease in relating to other women than to men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berndt, T. J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1447–1460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (1972). Sex and social participation. American Sociological Review, 37, 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 8, 721–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Reis, H. T. (1988). Interpersonal processes in close relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 609–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. (1977). What is a friend? New Society, 42, 116–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crohan, S. E., & Antonucci, T. C. (1989). Friends as a source of social support in old age. In R. G. Adams & R. Blieszner (Eds.), Older adult friendship: Structure and process. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, S. L. (1978). The therapeutic dimensions of friendship between women. Dissertation Abstracts, 39(1-A), 192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, V. J., Winstead, B. A., Wong, P. T. P., & Hunter, S. (1985). Gender effects in an initial encounter: A case where men exceed women in disclosure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, M., & Karlen, A. (1980). Sexual decisions. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, W. J., & Perlman, D. (1981). Friendship over the life cycle. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Developing personal relationships. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, D., & Hallinan, M. T. (1978). Sex differences in children's friendships. American Sociological Review, 43, 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S., Shaver, P., & Dyer, M. (1987). Prototypes of intimacy and distance in same-sex and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4, 195–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., & Vogel, W. H. (1989). Socioemotional bonding and neurobiochemistry. In M. Hojat & R. Crandall (Eds.), Loneliness: Theory, research, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D. R. (1978). Associational ties in academe: Some male and female differences. Sex Roles, 4, 9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kon, I. S. (1981). Adolescent friendship: Some unanswered questions for future research. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Developing personal relationships. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kon, I. S., & Losenkov, V. A. (1978). Friendship in adolescence: Values and behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 40, 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laosa, L. M., & Brophy, J. E. (1972). Effects of sex and birth order on sex-role development and intelligence among kindergarten children. Developmental Psychology, 6, 409–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D. J. (1978). The seasons of a man's life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, M. F., & Haven, C. (1968). Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. American Sociological Review, 33, 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, M. F., Thurnher, M., Chiriboga, D., & Associates (1975). Four stages of life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyness, J. F. (1978). Styles of relationships among unmarried men and women. Sociological Abstracts, 26, 1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, E. A., & Bultena, G. L. (1976). Sex differences in intimate friendships of old age. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 739–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T. (1984). Social interaction and well-being. In S. Duck (Ed.). Repairing personal relationships. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., Senchak, M., & Solomon, B. (1985). Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: Further examination of potential explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1204–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, relationships and interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. M. (1971). Toward the integration of psychotherapy. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. M. (1981). Adult friendships. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Developing personal relationships. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. M. (1983). SACRAL: Toward the meaning and measurement of friendliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 405–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. M. (1988). An indirect measure of the value of friendship for aging men. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 43(4), 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, J. M., & Billingham, S. (1989). SACRAL: Additional correlates of a self-report measure of friendliness-unfriendliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, E. K. (1984). Hands and hearts. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. B. (1983). Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z. (1980). Children's friendships. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharabany, R., Gershoni, R., & Hofman, J. E. (1981). Girlfriend, boyfriend: Age and sex differences in intimate friendship. Developmental Psychology, 17, 800–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. F., & Halverson, C. F. (1975). Intensive and extensive peer behavior: Longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis. Child Development, 46, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L., Reis, H. T., & Nezlek, J. (1983). Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 943–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstead, B. A. (1986). Sex differences in same-sex friendships. In V. J. Derlega & B. A. Winstead (Eds.), Friendship and social interaction. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, G. H. (1978). The natural history of friendship: Sex differences in best-friendship patterns. Dissertation Abstracts, 39(3-B), 1553.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reisman, J.M. Intimacy in same-sex friendships. Sex Roles 23, 65–82 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289880

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289880

Keywords

Navigation