Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple mating in a lekking bird: why do peahens mate with more than one male and with the same male more than once?

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Approximately 50% of marked peahens (Pavo cristatus) mate more than once with lek males. Some females mate with more than one male, others copulate repeatedly with the same male. The frequency of courtship also shows marked variation. Some females repeatedly engage males in courtship interactions after they have succesfully copulated with them. The likelihood of mating with more than one male increases if a female first mates with a non-preferred (unsuccessful male). There is a non-significant tendency for females to copulate with a more successful male when remating. Peahens may mate with a non-preferred male first if they do not encounter a successful male during their initial period of choice, perhaps because the most successful male on a lek was courting another female and/or was defended by another female. There are more aggressive interactions between females in front of preferred males. Preferred males receive more repetitive courtship behaviour and repeated matings. Dominant females are more likely to engage in repetitive courtship and matings. The number of times a female initiates courtship on any one day increases with the number of other females actively courting males at a lek site on that day. We suggest that there is competition amongst females for access to preferred males and that dominant females try to monopolise these males by repeatedly engaging them in courtship interactions. We discuss the implications of these observations for the idea that female may gain directly from mate choice in a species where males contribute nothing but gametes to their offspring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afton AD (1985) Forced copulation as a reproductive strategy of male lesser scaup: a field test of some predictions. Behaviour 92:146–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery MI (1984) Lekking in birds: choice, competition and reproductive constraints. Ibis 126:177–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G (1989) Multiple mating in a water strider: mutual benefits or intersexual conflict? Anim Behav 38:749–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR (1988) Behavioural aspects of sperm competition in birds. Adv Stud Behav 18:35–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Atkin L, Moller AP (1987) Copulation behaviour in birds. Behaviour 101:101–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1980) The birds of the western palaearctic, vol. 11. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton RL (1978) Why some felids copulate so much: a model for the evolution of copulation frequency. Carnivore 1:42–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday TR (1983) The study of mate choice. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday T, Arnold SJ (1987) Multiple mating by females: a perspective from quantitative genetics. Anim Behav 35:939–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1970) Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature 228:1218–1220

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruijt JA, Hogan AJ (1967) Social behaviour on the lek in black grouse, Lyrurus tetrix tetrix. Ardea 55:203–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Low BS (1979) Sexual selection and human ornamentation. In: Chagnon NA, Irons W (eds) Evolutionary biology and human social behaviour. Duxbury, North Scituate, Masachusetts, pp 462–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin S (1983) Female manipulation of male avoidance of cuckoldry behaviour in the ring dove. In: Wasser SK (ed) Social behaviour of female vertebrates. Academic Press, New York, pp 91–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1985) Mixed reproductive strategy and mate guarding in a semi-colonial passerine, the swallow Hirundo rustica. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:401–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1987) Variation in badge size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus: evidence for status signalling. Anim Behav 35:1637–1644

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1990) Sexual behaviour is related to badge size in the house sparrow Passer domesticus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1992) Frequency of female copulations with multiple males and sexual selection. Am Nat 139:1089–1101

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1989) Copulation behaviour in mammals: evidence that sperm competition is widespread. Biol J Linn See 38:119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton ES, Forman L, Braun M (1990) Extra-pair fertilizations and the evolution of colonial breeding in purple martins. Auk 107:275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss R (1980) Why are capercaillie cocks so big? Br Birds 73:440–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M (1992) Copulation behaviour in birds: why do females copulate more than once with the same male? Anim Behav 44 (in press)

  • Petrie M, Halliday TR, Sanders C (1991) Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim Behav 41:323–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JD, Gross MR (1990) Costs and benefits of female mate choice: Is there a lek paradox? Am Nat 136:230–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robel RJ (1970) Possible role of behavior in regulating greater prairie chicken populations. J Wildl Manage 34:306–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Robel RJ, Ballard WB (1974) Lek social organisation and reproductive success in the greater prairie chicken. Am Zool 14:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JW (1942) Mating behavior of the sage grouse. Auk 59:477–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz CW (1945) The ecology of the prairie chicken in Missouri. Univ Missouri Stud 20:1–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Small MF (1988) Female primate sexual behaviour and conception; are there really sperm to spare? Curr Anthropol 29:81–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rhijn JG (1991) The ruff. T&AD Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker WF (1980) Sperm utilisation strategies in nonsocial insects. Am Nat 115:780–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF (1987) Extra-pair copulations in a predominantly monogamous bird: genetic evidence. Anim Behav 35:877–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH (1974) Evolution of social organization and life history patterns among grouse (Aves: Tetraonidae). Q Rev Biol 49:201–227

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Correspondence to: M. Petrie at the present address

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petrie, M., Hall, M., Halliday, T. et al. Multiple mating in a lekking bird: why do peahens mate with more than one male and with the same male more than once?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31, 349–358 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177775

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177775

Keywords

Navigation