Abstract
Risk is the focal topic in the management of many activities and technologies. For that management to be successful, an explicit and accepted definition of the term “risk” is essential. Creation of that definition is a political act, expressing the definers' values regarding the relative importance of different possible adverse consequences for a particular decision. Those values, and with them the definition of risk, can change with changes in the decisionmaker, the technologies considered, or the decision problem. After a review of the sources of controversy in defining risk, a general framework is developed, showing how these value issues can be systematically addressed. As an example, the approach is applied to characterizing the risks of six competing energy technologies, the relative riskeness of which depends upon the particular definition used.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ahmed, S. and Husseiny, A. A. (1978). “A multivariate utility approach for selection of energy sources,” Energy 3: 669–700.
Baecher, G. B., Pate, M. E. and de Neufville, R. (1980). “Risk of dam failure in benefit-cost analysis,” Water Resources Research 16: 449–456.
Birkhofer, A. (1980). “The German risk study for nuclear power plants,” IAEA Bulletin 22 (5/6): 23–33.
Bliss, C., Clifford, P., Goldgraben, G., Graf-Webster, E., Krickenberger, K., Maher, H. and Zimmerman, N. (1979). Accidents and Unscheduled Events Associated with Non-Nuclear Energy Resources and Technology. Washington, D.C.: MITRE Corporation for Environmental Protection Agency.
Budnitz, R. J. and Holdren, J. P. (1976). “Social and environmental costs of energy systems,” Annual Review of Energy 1: 553–580.
Cohen, B. and Lee, I. (1979). “A catalog of risks,” Health Physics 36: 707–722.
Comar, C. L. and Sagan, L. A. (1976). “Health effects of energy production and conversion,” Annual Review of Energy 1: 581–660.
Cotgrove, A. (1982). Catastrophe or Cornucopia? The Environment, Politics and the Future. New York: Wiley.
Crouch, E. A. C. and Wilson, R. (1982). Risk/Benefit Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.
Department of Energy (1979). Energy Technologies for the United Kingdom, Vol. I and II. London: HMSO.
Derr, P., Goble, R., Kasperson, R. E. and Kates, R. W. (1983). “Responding to the double standard of worker/public protection,” Environment 25 (6): 6–11, 35–36.
Dunster, J. H. (1980). “The approach of a regulatory authority to the concept of risk,” IAEA Bulletin 22 (5/6): 123–128.
Elliott, G. R. and Eisdorfer, C., (Eds.) (1982). Stress and Human Health. New York: Springer Verlag.
Fischhoff, B. (1983). “Acceptable risk: The case of nuclear power,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2: 559–575.
Fischhoff, B. (1984). “Standard setting standards,” Management Science in press.
Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S. L. and Keeney, R. L. (1981). Acceptable Risk. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P. and Lichtenstein, S. (1983). “The public vs. The experts: Perceived vs. actual disagreements about the risks of nuclear power,” in V. Covello, G. Flamm, J. Rodericks, and R. Tardiff (Eds.), Analysis of Actual vs. Perceived Risks. New York: Plenum.
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S. and Combs, B. (1978). “How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits,” Policy Sciences 8: 127–152.
Green, C. H. (1980). “Risk: Attitudes and beliefs,” in D. V. Canter (Ed.), Behaviour in Fires. Chichester: Wiley.
Greenhalgh, G. (1980). The Necessity for Nuclear Power. London: Graham & Trotman.
Hamilton, L. D. (1980). “Comparative risks from different energy systems: Evolutions of the methods of studies,” IAEA Bulletin 22 (5/6): 35–71.
Herbert, J. H., Swanson, L. and Reddy, P. (1979). “A risky business,” Environment21 (6): 28–33.
Inhaber, H. (1979). “Risk with energy from conventional and nonconventional sources,” Science 203: 718–723.
Keeney, R. L. (1980). “Evaluating alternatives involving potential fatalities,” Operations Research 28: 188–205.
Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Trade-offs. New York: Wiley.
Lathrop, J. W. and Watson, S. R. (1982). “Decision analysis for the evaluation of risk in nuclear waste management,” Journal of the Operational Research Society 3: 407–418.
Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M. and Combs, B. (1978). “Judged frequency of lethal events,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4: 551–578.
Okrent, D. (1980). “Comment on social risk,” Science 208: 372–375.
Otway, H. and von Winterfeldt, D. (1982). “Beyond acceptable risk: On the social acceptability of technologies,” Policy Sciences 14: 247–256.
Reissland, J. and Harries, V. (1979). “A scale for measuring risks,” New Scientist 83: 809–811.
Rogers, D. W. O. and Templin, R. J. (1980). “Errors in a risk assessment of renewable resources,” Energy 5: 101–103.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1980). “Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk,” in R. Schwing and W. A. Albers Jr. (Eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? New York: Plenum.
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1984). “Characterizing perceived risk,” in R. W. Kates and C. Hohenemser (Eds.), Technological Hazard Management. Cambridge, Mass.: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain, in press.
Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, L. and Fischhoff, B. (1984). “Modeling the societal impact of fatal accidents,” Management Science in press.
Starr, C. (1969). “Social benefit versus technological risk,” Science 165: 1232–1238.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1982). Safety Goals for Nuclear Power Plants: A Discussion Paper. NUREG-0880. Washington, D.C.: The Commission.
Vlek, C. A. J. and Stallen, P. J. M. (1981). “Risk perception in the small and in the large,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 28: 235–271.
Watson, S. R. (1981). “On risks and acceptability,” Journal of the Radiological Protection Society 1: 21–25.
Wilson, R. (1979). “Analyzing the daily risks of life,” Technology Review 81 (4): 40–46.
Wynne, B. (1983). “Institutional mythologies and dual societies in the management of risk,” in H. C. Kunreuther and E. V. Ley (Eds.), The Risk Analysis Controversy. New York: Springer Verlag.
Zentner, R. D. (1979). “Hazards in the chemical industry,” Chemical and Engineering News57 (45): 25–27, 30–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischhoff, B., Watson, S.R. & Hope, C. Defining risk. Policy Sci 17, 123–139 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146924
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146924