Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of AISC-360 and EC3 strength limit states

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study has been undertaken to evaluate the similarities and differences between the steel building design specifications used in the United States and Europe. Expressions for nominal strength presented in the AISC-360 Specification and the Eurocode 3 Specification were compared for fundamental limit states. In particular, rules for cross-section classification, tension members, compression members, I-shaped members subjected to flexure, I-shaped members subjected to shear, and fasteners were studied. Results of the investigation revealed that, in general, both specifications provide nominal capacities that are close to each other. Significant differences were reported for some limit states such as flexure in I-shaped members with non-compact flanges, shear and lateral torsional buckling in I-shaped members, and bearing strength at bolt holes. In this paper, the details of the comparative study are presented along with observations that are useful for practicing engineers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AISC 360-05 (2005). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • AISC 341-05 (2005). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • AWS D1.1/D1.1M (2004). Structural Welding Code-Steel. American Welding Society.

  • ECCS (1986). Behavior and Design of Steel Plated Structures. European Convention for Constructional Steelwork, Publication No. 44, Brussels.

  • ECCS (2006). Rules for Member Stability in EN 1993-1-1: Background Documentation and Design Guidelines. European Convention for Constructional Steelwork, Publication No. 119, Brussels.

  • ECCS (2007). Commentary and Worked Examples to EN 1993-1-5 — Plated Structural Elements. European Convention for Constructional Steelwork, Publication No. 200, Brussels.

  • EN 1990 (2001). Eurocode-Basis of Structural Design. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1993-1-1 (2003). Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures — Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1993-1-5 (2004). Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures — Part 1–5: Plated Structural Elements. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 1993-1-8 (2003). Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures — Part 1–8: Design of Joints. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EN 10025 (1994). Hot Rolled Products of Non-alloy Structural Steel. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galambos, T.V. (1988). Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures, 4 th Edition. John Wiley & Sons, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, L. and Nethercot, D. A. (2005) Designers’ Guide to EN 1993-1-1 Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Thomas Telford Publishing, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 898-1 (1999). Mechanical Properties of Fasteners Made of Carbon Steel and Alloy Steel Part 1: Bolts, screws and studs. International Standardization Organization.

  • RCSC (2004). Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 and A490 Bolts. Research Council on Structural Connections, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cem Topkaya.

Additional information

Note.-Discussion open until August 1, 2011. This manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and possible publication on March 25, 2010; approved on November 16, 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Topkaya, C., Şahin, S. A comparative study of AISC-360 and EC3 strength limit states. Int J Steel Struct 11, 13–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/S13296-011-1002-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S13296-011-1002-x

Keywords

Navigation