# Estimation of Curie point depths and heat flow from Ardebil province, Iran, using aeromagnetic data

- 2.5k Downloads

## Abstract

This study attempts to estimate the Curie point depth (CPD) using the centroid and forward modelling of the spectral peak methods in the Sabalan geothermal field in Ardabil, NW of Iran. The reduced-to-pole aeromagnetic data were divided into 18 overlapping blocks of the sizes of 100 × 100 km. In the centroid method, the average depth to the top of the deepest crustal block, *Z* _{t}, was first computed by linear fitting to the second longest wavelength segment of the power spectrum of aeromagnetic data. Then, depth to the centroid of the deepest crustal block, *Z* _{0}, was computed by linear fitting to the longest wavelength segment of the power spectrum of the aeromagnetic data. The depth to the magnetic bottom was obtained from *Z* _{b} = 2*Z* _{0} − *Z* _{t}. In the forward modelling of the spectral peak method, the modelled spectra fitted to the observed spectrum iteratively and *Z* _{t} and *Z* _{b} were finally estimated. According to the obtained results, the CPD varies from 10 to 18.6 km. The Curie temperature of magnetite was used to determine the thermal gradient and the heat flow in the area. The study area is found to have a great energy potential in the west, northwest and the southwest of the Sabalan with shallow CPD, high geothermal gradient and heat flow.

## Keywords

Curie point depth Aeromagnetic Geothermal Sabalan Spectral analysis## Introduction

The Curie point (approximately 580 °C for magnetite at atmospheric pressure) is the temperature at which the spontaneous magnetization vanishes and magnetic minerals show paramagnetic susceptibility. The depth at which temperature reaches the Curie point is assumed to be the bottom of the magnetized bodies in the earth crust. Curie point temperature varies from region to region depending on the geology and the mineralogical content of the rocks. Therefore, one can normally expect shallow Curie point depth (CPD) at the regions which have geothermal potential, young volcanisms and thin crust (Aydin and Oksum 2010). The assessment of the variations in the Curie depth of an area can provide valuable information about the regional temperature distribution at depth and the potential of subsurface geothermal energy (Tselentis 1991).

The idea of using aeromagnetic data to estimate CPD is not new, and it has been widely applied to various parts of the world. Bhattacharyya and Leu (1975) mapped Curie point isothermal surface for geothermal reconnaissance of the Yellowstone National Park in USA. In this area, CPD was estimated 4–8 km. Tselentis (1991) calculated CPD in Greece from aeromagnetic and heat flow data. Tselentis’s objective was to understand the nature and extent of the regional geothermal system at a depth beneath the area of Greece by constructing the Curie isotherms. The results of his investigations revealed that the CPD varies considerably beneath Greece, reaching 20 km towards western Greece and about 10 km beneath the Aegean. In East and Southeast Asia, CPD was determined based on the spectral analysis of magnetic anomaly data by Tanaka et al. (1999). In this study, they used many heat flow data from the boreholes. The estimated CPD for this area using centroid method varied from 9 to 46 km. In addition, they predicted CPD from heat flow data. The CPD estimated from the heat flow data were very similar to the results of the CPD analysis of magnetic data. Dolmaz et al. (2005) concluded that the study of earth crust’s thermal structure in SW of Turkey is useful to determine modes of deformation, depths of brittle and ductile deformation zones and regional heat flow variations. Karastathis et al. (2010) found the deep origin of the geothermal fields and volcanic centres in central Greece, by combining a travel-time inversion of a micro-seismic dataset together with a CPD analysis based on the aeromagnetic data. They also found that a possible magma chamber can be presumed by detecting a low seismic velocity volume at depths below 8 km and the CPD estimation at about 7–8-km depth as well.

Bansal et al. (2011) estimated the bottom depth of magnetic sources in Germany using aeromagnetic data. At first, they proposed a modified centroid method to estimate the depth to the bottom of magnetic sources. To assess the calculated bottom depth of magnetic sources, the results were then compared with the heat flow density data. Saleh et al. (2012) estimated CPD and heat flow map for Northern Red Sea rift of Egypt. Their aim was to map the CPD based on the spectral analysis of the aeromagnetic data. The CPD varied from 5 to 20 km. The shallowest CPD of 5 km (associated with the high heat flow) was suggested a promising area for geothermal exploration. Eletta and Udensi (2012) investigated the CPD isotherm from the aeromagnetic data to prepare a preliminary potential map of geothermal resources in the Eastern Sector of Central Nigeria. They showed that the high prospect areas are located in the south-west parts of the study area. Obande et al. (2014) applied spectral analysis of aeromagnetic data for geothermal prospecting in the north-east Nigeria. They estimated the top and the centroid depths of magnetic source from the power spectrum. The obtained results were subsequently used to estimate the bottom depth. The range of CPD varies from 6 to 12 km according to the heat flow and CPD values of the study area wherein the highest heat flow value and the shallowest CPD occurred near the thermal springs. The Wikki warm spring area was found to have a great energy potential with a shallow CPD and very high heat flow values.

The geological and geophysical evidences together with the presence of several hot water springs in Ardebil province in the NW of Iran indicate that the area could have a high geothermal energy potential. Besides, the review of the published materials shows that no comprehensive aeromagnetic data analysis exists to prove the geothermal potential of the region. So, any study regarding to locate geothermal potential zones in such a vast region is highly important in the early stage of a geothermal exploration program. Therefore, this paper attempts to apply Centroid depth and forward modelling of the spectral peak methods of the aeromagnetic data to determine CPD in the main part of the Ardebil province particularly around the Sabalan mountain area. The heat flow values are then estimated and mapped to assess further geothermal zones.

## Geological settings

Ardebil geology is diverse and complicated and has a long evolution history. These features discriminate the area from the other part of Iran. North of Ardabil is covered with older alluvial, Clay, Marl and tuff intercalations. Surrounding region around Mt. Sabalan is characterized by the predominance of Quaternary terrace deposits (Dizu Formation); altered post-caldera Pleistocene trachyandesitic domes, flows and lahars (Kasra Formation); unaltered syn-caldera Pleistocene trachydacite to trachyandesitic flows, domes and lahars (Toas Formation); and pre-caldera trachyandesitic lavas, tuffs and pyroclastics (Valhazir Formation) (Fig. 2). The geologic study of the Northwest of Sabalan confirmed that there are two major types of structural setting: a set of linear faults and several inferred faults (SKM, Sinclair Knight Merz 2005); the faults strike predominantly towards the northwest and northeast (KML 1998). A northeast-southwest structural trend is dominant in the south of Ardebil city. The main geological units exposed in this area include Miocene’s altered tuff, tuff breccia, pumice, travertine, sandstone, shale, marl and conglomerate and Eocene’s olivine basalt and trachybasalt which overlay volcanic breccia and trachyandesite of Eocene age.

However, the structural trend changes to northwest-southeast direction in the further southern parts. This area geologically contains a sedimentary sequence including Cretaceous limestone, Jurassic’s shale and sandstone with intercalation of dolomite which overlain by Eocene’s volcanic breccia and trachyandesitic, trachybasaltic lava breccia and lava flows of Quaternary age.

## Data and methods

Aeromagnetic data of the area was obtained from the Geological Survey of Iran. This data was corrected for the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF 1976). This data was collected in 1974–1975.

In this study, the centroid depth and forward modelling of the spectral peak methods of the aeromagnetic data were used to determine CPD.

*p*(

*k*), could be simplified as follows (Blakely 1995; Stampolidis et al. 2005):

where *A* _{ 1 } is a constant and *Z* _{t} and *Z* _{b} represent the depths to the top and bottom of the magnetic body, respectively. *k* denotes the wave number of the magnetic field.

*Z*

_{b}) can be obtained in two steps. Firstly, the centroid depth (

*Z*

_{0}) of the deepest magnetic source is estimated from the slope of the longest wavelength part of the spectrum divided by the wave number using the following equation (Nwankwo and Shehu 2015):

where *P*(*k*) is the power density spectrum and *A* represents a constant.

where *B* is a constant.

The depth to the magnetic bottom is then obtained from *Z* _{b} = 2*Z* _{0} − *Z* _{t}.

## Forward modelling of the spectral peak method

where the constant *C*, non-depth-dependent term, can be adjusted to move the modelled curve up or down to fit the observed peak. Location of the spectral peak and the slope in the high wave number range are controlled by *Z* _{b} and *Z* _{t}, respectively. The combination of both *Z* _{t} and *Z* _{b} controls the slope immediately adjacent to the peak (Ravat et al. 2007). The advantage of forward modelling is that it allows one to fit iteratively the position and the width of the peak and match the adjacent part of the slope more precisely and explore the model space. Based on the fit of modelled spectra with the observed, one may accept or reject the results more confidently in this overall subjective process of fitting specific parts of the spectra.

In both of these methods, CPD is computed in three steps: (1) dividing the total magnetic field map into overlapping sub-regions, (2) calculating the logarithm of power spectrum for each region and (3) considering *Z* _{b} = 2*Z* _{0} − *Z* _{t} equation for centroid method and calculating the basal depth or fit of the modelled spectra with the observed spectrum and calculating *Z* _{t} and *Z* _{b.}

where *q* is the heat flow, *k* represents the coefficient of thermal conductivity, and \( \frac{\partial T}{\partial Z} \) denotes the thermal gradient.

## Data processing and analysis

Selecting the optimal dimensions of the sub-regions is very important. The limited depth extent of the crustal magnetization would be visible in magnetic maps, covering less than 100 × 100 km (Maus et al. 1997). Okubo et al. (1985, 2003) suggested the optimal dimensions of the investigated square window to be about ten times the actual target depth (Hisarli et al. 2011). Connard et al. (1983) divided a magnetic data of the Cascade Range, central Oregon, into overlapping blocks (77 × 77 km) and calculated the radially average power spectrum for each block. Tanaka et al. (1999) divided the East and Southeast Asia into sub-region data (approximately 200 × 200 km) and estimated the power density spectra for each region. Blakely (1988) divided the area of Nevada into blocks (120 × 120 km) in terms of magnetic or aeromagnetic data and mapped the CDP of Nevada state.

*L*/2

*π*, they may not be appropriately resolved by spectral method (Shuey et al. 1977). Therefore, data window of 100 × 100 km possibly will satisfactorily resolve only depth information to a depth of 15 km. This window size is based on the fact that a computer code which has been written to determine a proper block size for calculating the radial power spectra considers different window sizes varying from 50 to 400 km with a 10-km increasing step size. The absence of a peak indicates that the peak lies at wave numbers lower than the minimum resolved wave number; hence, a larger window size is needed to compute the radial power spectrum and detect the bottom of magnetic sources. The results show that a peak is observed for some window sizes, but it shifts and eventually disappears with increasing window size. The appropriate block size of 100 × 100 km was then chosen so that the maximum spectral peaks of the aeromagnetic data could be visible in the power spectrum. However, few blocks with CPD more than 13 km were recomputed with data window increased to 200 × 200 km. The 2D power spectrum of aeromagnetic data for each block was then computed using the Oasis montaj software with fast Fourier transform (FFT) method. Then, the effects of very deep regional structures were removed using a first-order trend filter for each block, and grids were expanded by 10 % using the maximum entropy method to make the edges continuous. The biggest advantage of 2D power spectrum is that the depth of sources is easily determined by measuring the slope of the power spectrum when the centroid method is used (Saleh et al. 2012).

## Results and discussion

*Z*

_{t}= 1.2 km) was estimated using Eq. 3 and Fig. 4a, then Eq. 2 was applied to estimate the centroid depth (

*Z*

_{0}= 7.8 km) as shown by Fig. 4b. Finally, CPD was calculated using

*Z*

_{b}= 2

*Z*

_{0}−

*Z*

_{t}= 14.4 km. Besides, Fig. 4c shows an example of the spectral peak forward modelling method of the same block. In this figure, the calculated power spectrum was fitted iteratively with the measured power spectrum using MATLAB software (Version 7.12.0.635, R2011a). By using this method, the top depth of this block (

*Z*

_{t}= 4.1 km) and Curie depth (

*Z*

_{b}= 14.1 km) were determined. The obtained results for the other blocks applying the centroid depth and forward modelling of the spectral peak methods are given by Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

Estimated CPD, geothermal gradients and heat flow by applying the centroid depth method for the 18 blocks in the study area

Block number | Coordinates (UTM) | Depth to centroid (km) | Depth to top (km) | CPD (km) | Geothermal gradient (°C/km) | Heat flow (mW/m | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Easting (m) | Northing (m) | ||||||

1 | 637,367.7 | 4,145,618 | 6.3 | 2.6 | 10.0 | 58.0 | 145.0 |

2 | 687,367.7 | 4,145,618 | 7.4 | 2.5 | 12.3 | 47.2 | 117.9 |

3 | 737,367.7 | 4,145,618 | 7.2 | 2.4 | 12.0 | 48.3 | 120.8 |

4 | 787,367.7 | 4,145,618 | 7.8 | 2.7 | 12.9 | 45.0 | 112.4 |

5 | 837,367.7 | 4,145,618 | 9.1 | 1.7 | 16.5 | 35.2 | 87.9 |

6 | 637,367.7 | 4,195,618 | 7.9 | 2.4 | 13.4 | 43.3 | 108.2 |

7 | 687,367.7 | 4,195,618 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 15.0 | 38.7 | 96.7 |

8 | 737,367.7 | 4,195,618 | 9.1 | 1.9 | 16.3 | 35.6 | 89.0 |

9 | 787,367.7 | 4,195,618 | 8.9 | 2.2 | 15.6 | 37.2 | 92.9 |

10 | 837,367.7 | 4,195,618 | 9.5 | 2.1 | 16.9 | 34.3 | 85.5 |

11 | 637,367.7 | 4,245,618 | 7.8 | 2.2 | 13.4 | 43.3 | 108.2 |

12 | 687,367.7 | 4,245,618 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 11.4 | 50.9 | 127.2 |

13 | 737,367.7 | 4,245,618 | 6.8 | 2.3 | 11.3 | 51.3 | 128.3 |

14 | 787,367.7 | 4,245,618 | 8.2 | 1.8 | 14.6 | 39.7 | 99.3 |

15 | 837,367.7 | 4,245,618 | 8.1 | 1.6 | 14.6 | 39.7 | 99.3 |

16 | 637,367.7 | 4,295,618 | 8.9 | 1.9 | 15.9 | 36.5 | 91.2 |

17 | 687,367.7 | 4,295,618 | 7.8 | 1.2 | 14.4 | 40.3 | 100.7 |

18 | 737,367.7 | 4,295,618 | 9.2 | 2.2 | 16.2 | 35.8 | 89.5 |

Estimated CPD, geothermal gradients and heat flow by using the forward modelling of spectral peak method for the 18 blocks in the study area

Block number | Coordinates (UTM) | Depth to top (km) | CPD (km) | Geothermal gradient (°C/km) | Heat flow (mW/m | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Easting (m) | Northing (m) | |||||

1 | 637,367.7 | 4,145,618 | 6.5 | 10.5 | 55.2 | 138.1 |

2 | 687,367.7 | 4,145,618 | 5.3 | 11.8 | 49.2 | 122.9 |

3 | 737,367.7 | 4,145,618 | 7.1 | 13.0 | 44.6 | 111.5 |

4 | 787,367.7 | 4,145,618 | 6.7 | 12.2 | 47.5 | 118.9 |

5 | 837,367.7 | 4,145,618 | 7.0 | 15.0 | 38.7 | 96.7 |

6 | 637,367.7 | 4,195,618 | 6.3 | 13.5 | 43.0 | 107.4 |

7 | 687,367.7 | 4,195,618 | 5.8 | 16.5 | 35.2 | 87.9 |

8 | 737,367.7 | 4,195,618 | 6.5 | 17.5 | 33.1 | 82.9 |

9 | 787,367.7 | 4,195,618 | 6.1 | 15.2 | 38.2 | 95.4 |

10 | 837,367.7 | 4,195,618 | 6.8 | 16.2 | 35.8 | 89.5 |

11 | 637,367.7 | 4,245,618 | 5.2 | 12.2 | 47.5 | 118.9 |

12 | 687,367.7 | 4,245,618 | 4.9 | 10.6 | 54.7 | 136.7 |

13 | 737,367.7 | 4,245,618 | 5.0 | 10.9 | 53.2 | 133.0 |

14 | 787,367.7 | 4,245,618 | 5.8 | 15.3 | 37.9 | 94.8 |

15 | 837,367.7 | 4,245,618 | 6.3 | 15.9 | 36.5 | 91.2 |

16 | 637,367.7 | 4,295,618 | 5.5 | 14.8 | 39.2 | 98.0 |

17 | 687,367.7 | 4,295,618 | 4.1 | 14.1 | 41.1 | 102.8 |

18 | 737,367.7 | 4,295,618 | 5.6 | 18.6 | 31.2 | 78.0 |

*k*) is given 2.5 Wm

^{−1}°C

^{−1}according to the average thermal conductivity of the crustal rocks (Stacey 1977). The geothermal gradient of each block was calculated by dividing 580 °C by the CPD. Heat flow was then calculated by multiplying the geothermal gradient by the thermal conductivity. Equation 5 was finally applied to estimate the flow map of the study area (Fig. 6). Figure 6a and Table 1 illustrate the lowest heat flow value (85.5 MW/m

^{2}) for block no. 10 and the highest heat flow value (145 MW/m

^{2}) for block no. 1. In Fig. 6b and Table 2, one can see the highest heat flow value of 138.1 MW/m

^{2}occurring in block no. 1 and the lowest heat flow value of 78.0 MW/m

^{2}in block no. 18. Tables 1 and 2 give the calculated CPD, heat flow and the geothermal gradient values for all 18 blocks. The maps in Fig. 7 show the geothermal gradient estimates each of these two methods. It can be observed that a region with high temperature gradient (Fig. 7a, 7b) and high heat flow (Fig. 6a, 6b) is associated with the shallow CPD (Fig.5a, b). Results of the both methods are rather the same. Also, the shallowest CPD, highest heat flow value and maximum thermal gradient are shown in the west, northwest and the southwest of study area. These results are confirmed by the available well data, gravity and magnetotelluric measurements. The CPD strongly varies according to the geological conditions (Ross et al. 2006). The CPDs at volcanic and geothermal areas are shallower than 10 km (Obande et al. 2014). Heat flow of about 80–100 MW/m

^{2}indicates geothermal anomalous conditions (Jessop et al. 1976). For the study area and area around Mt. Sabalan, the geothermal anomalous conditions have been assigned to the most blocks. As a result, the study area is found to have a great energy potential in the west, northwest and the southwest of Mt. Sabalan with a shallow CPD, high geothermal gradient and heat flow.

## Conclusions

An attempt has been made to calculate the depth to bottom of the magnetic sources from the aeromagnetic data in the Ardebil province in NW of Iran using spectral methods. The CDP has been calculated by the centroid depth and forward modelling of the spectral peak methods. The results show that CPD varies from 10 km in the southwest to 18.6 km in the north and northeast of the study area. The calculated thermal gradient based on the CPD varies from 58.0 °C/km in the southwest to 31.2 °C/km in the north and east of study area. The corresponding prepared heat flow maps using thermal conductivity and thermal gradients indicate that the highest and lowest heat flow values occurred in southwest (145.0 MW/m^{2}) and north (78.0 MW/m^{2}) and east of the Mt. Sabalan, respectively. According to the shallow calculated CPD and high heat flow values that occur on the west, the northwest and the southwest of the Mt. Sabalan and considering the available geological and some geophysical information, it can be concluded that these areas may have a great potential of geothermal energy. Consequently, it is proposed the results of this study to be integrated in the GIS environment with all available geological, geophysical, geochemical and other information layers. This additional information will facilitate selection of the optimum site for exploration.

## References

- Aydin I, Oksum E (2010) Exponential approach to estimate the Curie-temperature depth. J Geophys Eng 7:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bansal AR, Gabriel G, Dimri VP, Krawczyk CM (2011) Estimation of depth to the bottom of magnetic sources by a modified centroid method for fractal distribution of sources: an application to aeromagnetic data in Germany. Geophysics 76(3):11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bhattacharyya BK, Leu LK (1975) Analysis of magnetic anomalies over Yellowstone National Park: mapping of Curie point isothermal surface for geothermal reconnaissance. J Geophys Res 80:4461–4465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bhattacharyya BK, Leu LK (1977) Spectral analysis of gravity and magnetic anomalies due to rectangular prismatic bodies. Geophysics 41:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blakely R (1988) Curie temperature isotherm analysis and tectonic implications of aeromagnetic data from Nevada. J Geophys Res 93:11817–11832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blakely RJ (1995) Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Connard G, Couch R, Gemperle M (1983) Analysis of aeromagnetic measurements from the Cascade Range in central Oregon. Geophysics 48:376–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dolmaz MN, Ustaomer T, Hisarli ZM, Orbay N (2005) Curie point depth variations to infer thermal structure of the crust at the African-Eurasian convergence zone, SW Turkey. Earth, Planets and Space
**57**:373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eletta BE, Udensi EE (2012) Investigation of the Curie point isotherm from the magnetic fields of eastern sector of central Nigeria. Geosciences 2(4):101–106Google Scholar
- Finn CA, Ravat D (2004) Magnetic depth estimates and their potential for constraining crustal composition and heat flow in Antarctica, EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Un, 85(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract T11A-1236.Google Scholar
- Fotouhi M (1995) Geothermal development in Sabalan, Iran. World Geothermal Congress, ItalyGoogle Scholar
- Ghaedrahmati R, Moradzadeh A, Fathianpour N, Lee SK, Porkhial S (2013) 3-D inversion of MT data from the Sabalan geothermal field, Ardabil, Iran. J Appl Geophys 93:12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hisarli ZM, Dolmaz MN, Okyar M, Etiz A, Orbay N (2011) Investigation into regional thermal structure of the Thrace Region, NW Turkey, from aeromagnetic and borehole data. Stud Geophys Geod 56:269–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jessop AM, Hobart MA, Sclater JG (1976) The world heat flow data collection 1975, Geothermal Services of Canada. Geothermal Service 50:55–77Google Scholar
- Karastathis VK, Papoulia J, Di Fiore B, Makris J, Tsambas A, Stampolidis A, Papadopoulos GA (2010) Exploration of the deep structure of the central Greece geothermal field by passive seismic and Curie depth analysis, 72nd EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010, Barcelona, Spain, 14–17 June 2010, paper Po12.Google Scholar
- KML (1998) Sabalan geothermal project, stage 1-surface exploration, final exploration report. Kingston Morrison Limited Co., report 2505-RPT-GE-003 for the Renewable Energy Organization of Iran, Tehran, p. 83Google Scholar
- Maus S, Gordon D, Fairhead D (1997) Curie temperature depth estimation using a self-similar magnetization model. Geophys J Int 129:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nwankwo LI, Shehu AT (2015) Evaluation of Curie-point depths, geothermal gradients and near-surface heat flow from high-resolution aeromagnetic (HRAM) data of the entire Sokoto Basin, Nigeria. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 305:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Obande GE, Lawal KM, Ahmed LA (2014) Spectral analysis of aeromagnetic data for geothermal investigation of Wikki Warm Spring, north-east Nigeria. Geothermics 50:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Okubo Y, Graf RJ, Hansent RO, Ogawa K, Tsu H (1985) Curie point depths of the island of Kyushu and surrounding areas Japan. Geophysics 53:481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Okubo Y, Matsushima J, Correia A (2003) Magnetic spectral analysis in Portugal and its adjacent seas. Phys Chem Earth 28:511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ravat D (2004) Constructing full spectrum potential-field anomalies for enhanced geodynamical analysis through integration of surveys from different platforms (INVITED), EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Un., 85(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract G44A-03.Google Scholar
- Ravat D, Pignatelli A, Nicolosi I, Chiappini M (2007) A study of spectral methods of estimating the depth to the bottom of magnetic sources from near-surface magnetic anomaly data. Geophys J Int 169:421–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ross HE, Blakely RJ, Zoback MD (2004) Testing the utilization of aeromagnetic data for the determination of Curie-isotherm depth, EOS, Trans. Am. Geophys. Un., 85(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract T31A-1287.Google Scholar
- Ross HE, Blakely RJ, Zoback MD (2006) Testing the use of aeromagnetic data for the determination of Curie depth in California. Geophysics 71(
**5**):L51–L59CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Saleh S, Salk M, Pamukcu O (2012) Estimating Curie point depth and heat flow map for northern Red Sea rift of Egypt and its surroundings, from aeromagnetic data,
*Pure Appl Geophys*Google Scholar - Shuey RT, Schellinger DK, Tripp AC, LB A (1977) Curie depth determination from aeromagnetic spectra. Geophys J R Astron Soc 50:75–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- SKM (Sinclair Knight Merz) 2005 Resource review of the Northwest Sabalan geothermal project. Report submitted to SUNA. (61p).Google Scholar
- Stacey FD (1977) Physics of the Earth, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, p. 414Google Scholar
- Stampolidis A, Kane I, Tsokas GN, Tsourlos P (2005) Curie point depths of Albania from ground total field magnetic data. Survey Geophysics 26:461–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tanaka A, Okubo Y, Matsubayashi O (1999) Curie point depth based on spectrum analysis of magnetic anomaly data in East and Southeast Asia. Tectonophysics 306:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tselentis GA (1991) an attempt to define curie depths in Greece from aeromagnetic and heat flow data. PAGEOPH 136:87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turcotte DL, Schubert G (1982) Geodynamics: applications of continuum physics to geological problems. Wiley, New York, p. 450Google Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.