Skip to main content
Log in

Flow dynamic comparison of In-situ internal thoracic and gastroepiploic arterial conduits

Experimental study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: We tried to experimentally clarify the flow dynamic differences under flow competitive conditions between the internal thoracic artery (ITA) and gastroepiploic artery (GEA) as in-situ arterial bypass conduits. Methods: The ITA and the GEA were anastomosed close together to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in 8 pigs. Flow characteristics of the ITA and the GEA were analyzed using a transit time flow meter under the following flow competitive conditions; condition A: the ITA, GEA and LAD were left open, condition B: either of the ITA or GEA were clamped and the LAD was left open, condition C: the ITA and GEA were open but the proximal LAD was clamped, condition D: either of the ITA or GEA were clamped and the proximal LAD was also clamped. Results: The flow volume of the ITA was significantly (p<0.001) greater than that of the GEA in condition A (27±11 ml/min vs. −4±9 ml/min), B (26±17 ml/min vs. −1±14 ml/min) and C (38±14 ml/min vs. 0±4 ml/min), but did not differ (p=0.685) in condition D (29±6 ml/min vs. 31±14 ml/min). Retrograde flow in systole and antegrade flow in diastole was seen in the GEA in condition A, B and C. Conclusion: Under flow competitive conditions, flow of the GEA was inferior to that of the ITA. These data suggested that the GEA is more sensitive to competitive flow than the ITA. This may be due to anatomical differences between these in-situ bypass conduits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, et al. Influence of the internal- mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 1–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, Ratliff NB, Easley K, Taylor PC. Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 89: 248–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Endo M, Koyanagi H, Kasanuki H. Coronary artery bypass with only in situ bilateral internal thoracic arteries and right gastroepiploic artery. Circulation 2001; 104 (12 Suppl 1): I-76–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tavilla G, Kappetein AP, Braun J, Gopie J, Tjien AT, Dion RA. Long-term follow-up of coronary artery bypass grafting in three- vessel disease using exclusively pedicled bilateral internal thoracic and right gastroepiploic arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 794–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones EL, Lattouf OM, Weintraub WS. Catastrophic consequences of internal mammary artery hypoperfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 98: 902–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Navia D, Cosgrove DM 3rd Lytle BW, Taylor PC, McCarthy PM, Stewart RW, et al. Is the internal thoracic artery the conduit of choice to replace a stenotic vein graft? Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57: 40–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Siebenmann R, Egloff L, Hirzel H, Rothlin M, Studer M, Tartini R. The internal mammary artery ‘string phenomenon’. Analysis of 10 cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1993; 7: 235–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakao T, Kawaue Y. Effect of coronary revascularization with the right gastroepiploic artery. Comparative examination of angiographic findings in the early postoperative period. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 106: 149–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashimoto H, Isshiki T, Ikari Y, Hara K, Saeki F, Tamura T, et al. Effects of competitive blood flow on arterial graft patency and diameter. Medium-term postoperative follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111:399–407.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimizu T, Hirayama T, Suesada H, Ikeda K, Ito S, Ishimaru S. Effect of flow competition on internal thoracic artery graft: postoperative velocimetric and angiographic study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120:459–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Son JA, Smedts F, Vincent JG, van Lier HJ, Kubat K. Comparative anatomic studies of various arterial conduits for myocardial revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 99: 703–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. He GW, Yang CQ. Comparison among arterial grafts and coronary artery. An attempt at functional classification. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 707–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirose H, Amano A, Takanashi S, Takahashi A. Coronary artery bypass grafting using the gastroepiploic artery in 1,000 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1371–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shimizu T, Ito S, Kikuchi Y, Misaka M, Hirayama T, Ishimaru S, et al. Arterial conduit shear stress following bypass grafting for intermediate coronary artery stenosis: a comparative study with saphenous vein grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 578–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sabik JF 3rd, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Khan M, Houghtaling PL, Cosgrove DM. Does competitive flow reduce internal thoracic artery graft patency? Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 1490–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Suma H, Isomura T, Horii T, Sato T. Late angiographic result of using the right gastroepiploic artery as a graft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 120: 496–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nishida H, Endo M, Koyanagi H, Koyanagi T, Nakamura K. Coronary artery bypass grafting with the right gastroepiploic artery and evaluation of flow with transcutaneous Doppler echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 108: 532–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawasuji M, Takemura H, Sakakibara N, Matsui O, Watanabe Y. Coronary steal caused by a right gastroepiploic artery graft. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57: 1645–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tedoriya T, Kawasuji M, Sakakibara N, Ueyama K, Watanabe Y. Pressure characteristics in arterial grafts for coronary bypass surgery. Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 3: 381–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tedoriya T, Kawasuji M, Ueyama K, Sakakibara N, Takemura H, Watanabe Y. Physiologic characteristics of coronary artery bypass grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 951–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yasuura K, Takagi Y, Ohara Y, Takami Y, Matsuura A, Okamoto H. Theoretical analysis of right gastroepiploic artery grafting to right coronary artery. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 728–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Swindle MM, Horneffer PJ, Gardner TJ, Gott VL, Hall TS, Stuart RS, et al. Anatomic and anesthetic considerations in experimental cardiopulmonary surgery in swine. Lab Anim Sci 1986; 36: 357–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Edwards WS, Lewis CE, Blakeley WR, Napolitano L. Coronary artery bypass with internal mammary and splenic artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1973; 15: 35–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamaguchi A, Endo H, Adachi H, Kawahito K, Ino T. Off-pump coronary artery bypass in patients with Takayasu’s disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 2186–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chavanon O, Durand M, Hacini R, Bouvaist H, Noirclerc M, Ayad T, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting with left internal mammary artery and right gastroepiploic artery, with and without bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 499–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iida, Y., Obitsu, Y. & Shigematsu, H. Flow dynamic comparison of In-situ internal thoracic and gastroepiploic arterial conduits. Jpn J Thorac Caridovasc Surg 54, 233–238 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022242

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022242

Key words

Navigation