Skip to main content
Log in

Rush, delay or money burning: Informational biases in policy decisions

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Economics of Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

We examine the consequences when the public is unsure about the ability of governments to foresee the effects of decisions. Governments with much information should invest either immediately or never. Governments that are not well informed should wait for better information. But since governments want to signal their abilities to solve problems, we observe rash decisions and problems are portrayed as crises. We also show that excessive delay can occur. Delay or rush occur even if there is very little uncertainty about abilities of governments. We discuss three institutional rules to alleviate the rush and delay bias: Limiting expenditures before elections, experimental clauses or money burning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: January 26, 1999 / Accepted: October 20, 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gersbach, H. Rush, delay or money burning: Informational biases in policy decisions. Econ Gov 1, 137–155 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00021679

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00021679

Navigation