Skip to main content
Log in

The role of spiral CT vs plain films in acute cervical spine trauma: a comparative study

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic yield of conventional radiographs versus helical computed tomography (CT) in screening acute trauma patients. Methods: We reviewed 604 trauma patients who presented to our level I trauma emergency room and underwent both conventional radiography and spiral CT of the cervical spine of. Results: Of the 604 patients, 30 (5.13 %) had fractures seen on helical CT, only 10 of which were diagnosed on conventional radiography. Conclusion: In the screening of acute trauma patients, conventional radiography is less sensitive in detecting fractures than helical CT. CT should therefore be considered as a standard modality choice in such cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, H., Sharma, V., Shah, K. et al. The role of spiral CT vs plain films in acute cervical spine trauma: a comparative study. Emergency Radiology 8, 311–314 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011930

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011930

Navigation