Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative risk analysis for metropolitan solid waste management systems

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional solid waste management planning usually focuses on economic optimization, in which the related environmental impacts or risks are rarely considered. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the methodology of how optimization concepts and techniques can be applied to structure and solve risk management problems such that the impacts of air pollution, leachate, traffic congestion, and noise increments can be regulated in the iong-term planning of metropolitan solid waste management systems. Management alternatives are sequentially evaluated by adding several environmental risk control constraints stepwise in an attempt to improve the management strategies and reduce the risk impacts in the long run. Statistics associated with those risk control mechanisms are presented as well. Siting, routing, and financial decision making in such solid waste management systems can also be achieved with respect to various resource limitations and disposal requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Chang, N.-B. and S. F. Wang. 1994. A Locational model for the site selection of solid waste management facilities with traffic congestion constraint. Civil Engineering Systems 11: 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, N.-B., Y. C. Yang, and S. F. Wang. 1995a. Solid waste management system analysis with noise control and traffic congestion limitations. Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE (in press).

  • Chang, N.-B., C. A. Shoemaker, and R. E. Schuler. 1995b. Solid waste management system analysis with air pollution and leachate impact limitations. Waste Management & Research (in press).

  • Corello, V. T., and M. W. Merkhofer. 1993. Risk assessment methods. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuertes, L. A.,J. F. Hudson, and D. H. Mark. 1974. Solid waste management: Equality trade-off models. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, ASCE 100(2):155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottinger, H. W. 1986. A computational model for solid waste management with applications. Applied Mathematical Modelling 10:330–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasit, Y., and D. B. Warner. 1981. Regional solid waste planning with WRAP, Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE 107(3):511–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, B. P., and R. M. Clark. 1974. Locational models for solid waste management. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, ASCE 97(1):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, L. 1982. Parametric mixed integer programming: An application to solid waste management. Management Science 28(11):1270–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirca, Ö., and N. Erkip. 1988. Selecting transfer station locations for large solid waste systems. European Journal of Operation Research 38:339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühner, J., and J. J. Harrington. 1975. Mathematical models for developing regional solid waste management policies. Engineering Optimization 1:237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, D. H.., C. S. ReVelle, and J. C. Liebman. 1979. Mathematical models of location: A review. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, ASCE 94(2):81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkhofer, M. M. 1987. Decision science and social risk. D. Reidel Publishing, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, T. E. 1986. Modelling process in the unsaturated zone. Water resources symposium, No. 13, Center for Research in Water Resources, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W., M. Aquilina, and D. Schur. 1974. Development and use of a fixed charge programming model for regional solid waste planning. presented at the 46th joint meeting of the Operation Research Society of America and the Institute of Management Sciences, Puerto Rico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, N. H., L. K. Wang, T. Simmons, and J. Bergenthal. 1979. Computer-aided air quality management. Journal of Environmental Management 9:61–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. R. 1991. Environmental risk: Identification and management. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z., and C. ReYelle. 1990. A cost allocation method for facilities siting with fixed-charge cost functions. Civil Engineering Systems 7:29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China

    Ni-Bin Chang & S. F. Wang

Authors
  1. Ni-Bin Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. F. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, NB., Wang, S.F. Comparative risk analysis for metropolitan solid waste management systems. Environmental Management 20, 65–80 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006703

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006703

Key Words

Search

Navigation