Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the california environmental quality act

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) has evolved from a mini-NEPA, first enacted in 1970, into a procedural act that affects the approval process of all large developments in California. In 1990, California local governments produced over 1600 environmental impact reports and 30,000 initial studies under CEQA. Because of its widespread use, CEQA has periodically drawn the attention of the state legislature, most recently in 1993, when over 60 CEQA reform bills were introduced. This paper describes the CEQA process and evaluates its success at meeting its explicit and implicit goals. The research includes a statewide survey of CEQA practice, sent to the planning departments of all 513 local governments in California in 1991. Survey respondents agreed that CEQA helps in evaluating environmental impacts, reducing impacts, informing the public, and coordinating public agency review. It is effective in reducing the environmental impacts of individual projects, but is not as effective in improving environmental quality on an areawide scale. This research concludes that CEQA has led to positive outcomes and is not as deeply flawed as many of its critics claim. Still, CEQA as currently designed may not be the optimal vehicle for ensuring environmental quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Altshuler, A. 1965. The goals of comprehensive planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31(3):186–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, E. C. 1959. Ends and means in planning, International Social Science Journal 11:3. Reprinted, pages 139-149 in A. Faludi (ed.), 1973. A reader in planning theory. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, R. V. 1986. Rationality and the logic of the National Environmental Policy Act. The Environmental Professional 8:105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, R. V. 1989. Impact assessment as a policy strategy. Pages 1–4 in R. V. Bartlett (ed.), Policy through impact assessment. Greenwood Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binger, G., and J. McBride. 1991. CEQA At twenty-one. Western City August:14–16, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollens, S. A. 1992. State growth management: intergovernmental frameworks and policy objectives. Journal of the American Planning Association 58(4):454–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, L. K. 1982. Science and the National Environmental Policy Act. The University of Alabama Press, University, Alabama, 178 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Office of Planning and Research. 1976. The California Environmental Quality Act: A review. Sacramento, California.

  • Catalano, R., and R. Reich. 1977. Local government law and the E.I.R.: The California experience. Urban Lawyer 9:195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEQA Task Force. 1993. Final report, streamlining CEQA: An action agenda. CEQA Task Force, California Chapter American Planning Association/Association of Environmental Professionals. 12 March 1993.

  • Council on California Competitiveness. 1992. California’s jobs and future. Newport Beach, California, 23 April 1992.

  • Council on Environmental Quality. 1993. Environmental quality, the twenty-third annual report of the Council on Environmental Quality together with the President’s address to Congress. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, L. C. 1989. The limits of regulation, evidence from local plan implementation in California. Journal of the American Planning Association 55(2):151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Analysis Systems, Inc. 1975. The California Environmental Quality Act, an evaluation emphasizing its impact upon California cities and counties with recommendations for improving its effectiveness, 3 vol. Report prepared for California Assembly Committee on Local Government, November 1975.

  • Fulton, W. 1985. The environmental push and pull. California Lawyer 5(3):51–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, W. 1991. Guide to California planning. Solano Press Books, Point Arena, California, 297 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, D. E. 1992. Eight state-sponsored growth management programs, a comparative analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 58(4):425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, S. 1993. CEQA runs into politics. California Planner July/August:4.

  • Goggin, M. L., A. O. Bowman, J. P. Lester, and L. J. O’Toole, Jr. 1990. Implementation theory and practie, toward a third generation. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. 1989. Tracking CEQA mitigation measures under AB 3180. Sacramento, California.

  • Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. 1992. CEQA: California Environmental Quality Act: Statute and guidelines. Sacramento, California.

  • Herson, A. I. 1993. 1993 CEQA amendments: Good start, but more streamlining needed. California Environmental Law Reporter 12:425–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, H. 1990. Implementation: A review and suggested framework. Pages 462–480 in N. B. Lynn and A. Wildavsky (eds.), Public administration: The state of the discipline. Chatham House, Chatham, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R. A., and W. S. McCartney. 1991. Local government implementation of mitigation requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 11:53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. 1995. Case Studies in CEQA Implementation. Chapter 5 in J. D. Landis and others (eds.), Fixing CEQA: Options and opportunities for reforming the California Environmental Quality Act. Final report to the California Policy Seminar, Berkeley, January 1995.

  • Lindblom, C. E. 1959. The science of “muddling through.” Public Administration Review 19:79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G., and A. Wildavsky. 1979. Implementation as evolution. Pages 177–194 in J. L. Pressman and A. Wildavsky (eds.), Implementation, 2nd ed. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manaster, K. A., and Selmi, D. P. 1989. California environmental law and land use practice. Mathew Bender, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazmanian, D. A., and P. A. Sabatier. 1983. Implementation and public policy. Scott Foresman and Co., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Planning and Research. 1990. State of California general plan guidelines. Office of Planning and Research, Local Government Affairs, Governor’s Office, Sacramento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshansky, R. B. 1996. The California Environmental Quality Act and its effect on local planning. Journal of the American Planning Association. (in press).

  • Pendall, R. 1995. How does CEQA compare with environmental analysis and assessment requirements in other states? Chapter 3 in J. D. Landis and others (eds.), Fixing CEQA: Options and opportunities for reforming the California Environmental Quality Act. Final report to the California Policy Seminar, Berkeley, January 1995.

  • Public Policy Research Organization. 1976. The California Environmental Quality Act: The integration of CEQA and local planning practices. Prepared for California Office of Planning and Research, Sacramento, by Public Policy Research Organization, University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remy, M. H., T. A. Thomas, J. G. Moose, and J. W. Yeates. 1994. Guide to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), 1994 (8th) ed. Solano Press Books, Point Arena, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. 1986. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy 6:21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selmi, D. P. 1984. The judicial development of the California Environmental Quality Act. University of California, Davis, Law Review 18:197–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shute, E. C., Jr. 1993. CEQA turns twenty-one. Land Use Forum 2(2):95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small and Knust, Inc. 1980. California local government and CEQA. Report submitted to the California Assembly Committee on Rules.

  • Sybert, R., and others. 1993. Strategic growth: taking charge of the future. Report of the Growth Management Council to Governor Wilson, Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Sacramento, California, 25 January 1993.

  • Taylor, S. 1984. Making bureaucracies think, the environmental ipmact statement strategy of administrative reform. Stanford University Press, Standard, California, 410 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T. A. 1993. In defense of CEQA. Land Use Forum 2(2):102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandesforde-Smith, G. 1981. The evolution of environmental impact assessment in California. Pages 47–76 in T. O’Riordan and W. R. Derrick Sewell (eds), Project appraisal and policy review. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandesforde-Smith, G., and J. Kerbavaz. 1988. The co-evolution of politics and policy: Elections, entrepreneurship and EIA in the United States. Pages 161–191 in P. Wathern (ed.), Environmental impact assessment, theory and practice. Unwin Hyman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, M. M. 1965. The roles of intelligence systems in urbansystems planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31(4):289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zischke, M. H., and S. L. Kostka. 1993. A call for reform. Land Use Forum 2(2):109–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 907 1/2 West Nevada Street, 61801, Urbana, Illinois, USA

    Robert B. Olshansky

Authors
  1. Robert B. Olshansky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olshansky, R.B. Evaluation of the california environmental quality act. Environmental Management 20, 11–23 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006694

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006694

Key Words

Search

Navigation