Journal of Molecular Evolution

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 119–124 | Cite as

Use of a deviant mitochondrial genetic code in yellow-green algae as a landmark for segregating members within the phylum

  • Megumi Ehara
  • Yasuko Hayashi-Ishimaru
  • Yuji Inagaki
  • Takeshi Ohama
Articles

Abstract

Several algae that were previously classified in the phylum Xanthophyta (yellow-green algae) were assigned in 1971 to a new phylum, Eustigmatophyta. It was anticipated that the number of algae reclassified to Eustigmatophyta would increase. However, due to the fact that the morphological characteristics that segregate eustigmatophytes from other closely related algae can be only obtained through laborious electron microscopic techniques, the number of members in this phylum have increased rather slowly. We attempted, therefore, to segregate two closely related groups of algae, eustigmatophytes and yellow-green algae, on the basis of a molecular phylogenetic tree as a means of providing an alternative method of distinguishing these phyla. We analyzed the mitochondrial cyto-chrome oxidase subunit I (COXI) gene sequences of eight algae classified as xanthophyceans and found that six manifested the expected deviant genetic code where AUA codes for methionine (AUA/Met), but not for isoleucine (AUA/Ile) as in the universal genetic code. The other two, Monodus sp. (CCMP 505) and Ophiocytium majus (CCAP 855/1), which were presumed to be yellow-green algae, and all the examined eustigmatophytes utilized AUA for Ile. In addition, the phylogenetic tree of COXI gene sequences showed that the six yellow-green algae bearing the AUA/Met deviant code composed a tight clade with a bootstrap value of 100%. The phylogenetic tree of the corresponding sequences from Monodus sp. and Ophiocytium majus and the eustigmatophytes also composed a tight cluster, but with a bootstrap value of 92%. These results strongly suggest that two previously classified members of yellow-green algae belong to the phylum Eustigmatophyta. Therefore, examination of the mitochondrial genetic code in algae appears to be a potentially very useful genetic marker for classifying these organisms, especially when it is considered with the results obtained through a molecular phylogenetic tree.

Key words

Deviant genetic code Eustigmatophyta Xanthophyta Cytochrome oxidase subunit I 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antia NJ, Bisalputra T, Cheng JY, Kalley JP (1975) Pigment and cytological evidence for reclassification of Nannochloris oculata and Monallantus salina in Eustigmatophyceae. J Phycol 11:339–343Google Scholar
  2. Bessho Y, Ohama T, Osawa S (1991) Planarian mitochondria II: The unique genetic code as deduced from COI gene sequences. J Mol Evol 34:324–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyen C, Leblanc C, Bonnard G, Grienenberger J-M, Kloareg B (1994) Nucleotide sequence of the COX3 gene from Chondrus crispus: evidence that UGA encodes tryptophan and evolutionary implications. Nucleic Acids Res 22:1400–1403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantatore P, Roberti M, Rainaldi G, Gadaleta MN, Saccone C (1989) The complete nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code of the mitochondrial genome of Paracentrotus lividus. J Biol Chem 264:10965–10975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Douglas SE, Murphy CA, Spencer DF, Gray MW (1991) Cryptomonad algae are evolutionary chimeras of two phylogenetically distinct unicellular eukaryotes. Nature 350:148–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Douglas SE (1992) Eukaryote-eukaryote endosymbioses: insights from studies of a cryptomonad alga. BioSystems 28:57–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eschbach S, Hofmann CJB, Maier G-U, Sitte P, Hansmann P (1991) A eukaryotic genome of 660 kb: electrophoretic karyotype of nucleo-morph and cell nucleus of the cryptomonad alga, Pyrenomonas salina. Nucleic Acids Res 19:1779–1781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibbs SP (1981) The chloroplasts of some algal groups may have evolved from endosymbiotic eukaryotic algae. Ann New York Acad Sci 361:193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbs SP (1993) The evolution of algal chloroplasts. In: Lewin RA (ed) Origin of plastids. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 107–121Google Scholar
  11. H-Ishimaru Y, Ohama T, Kawatsu Y, Nakamura K, Osawa S (1996) UAG is a sense codon in several chlorophycean mitochondria. Curr Genet 30:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hibberd DJ, Leedale GF (1971) A new algal class-the Eustigmatophyceae. Taxon 20:523–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hibberd DJ (1981) Notes on the taxonomy and nomenclature of the algal classes Eustigmatophytes and Tribophyceae (synonym Xan-thophyceae). Botanical J Linnean Society 82:93–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hibberd DJ (1989a) Phylum Eustigmatophyta. In: Margulis L, Corliss JO, Melkonian M, Chapman DJ (eds) Handbook of protoctista. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, pp 326–332Google Scholar
  15. Hibberd DJ (1989b) Phylum Xanthophyta. In: Margulis L, Corliss JO, Melkonian M, Chapman DJ (eds) Handbook of protoctista. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, pp 686–697Google Scholar
  16. Himeno H, Masaki H, Ohta T, Kumagai I, Miura KI, Watanabe K (1987) Unusual genetic codes and a novel genome structure for tRNASer AGY in starfish mitochondrial DNA. Gene 56:219–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffmann RJ, Boore JL, Brown WM (1992) A novel mitochondrial genome organization for the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Genetics 131:397–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobs HT, Elliott DJ, Math VB, Farquharson A (1988) Nucleotide sequence and gene organization of sea-urchin mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Biol 202:185–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar S, Rzhetsky A (1996) Evolutionary relationships of eukaryotic kingdoms. J Mol Evol 42:183–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee KW, Bold HC (1973) Pseudocharaciopsis texensis gen. et sp. nov., a new member of the Eustigmatophyceae. British Phycol J 8:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manhart JR, Palmer JD (1990) The gain of two chloroplast tRNA introns marks the green algal ancestors. Nature 345:268–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McFadden GI, Gilson PR, Hofmann CJB, Adcock GJ, Maier U-G (1994) Evidence that an amoebae acquired a chloroplast by retaining part of an engulfed eukaryotic alga. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:3690–3694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morden CW, Delwiche CF, Kuhsel M, Palmer JD (1992) Gene phylogenies and the endosymbiotic origin of plastids. BioSystems 28: 75–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moriya J, Yokogawa T, Wakita K, Ueda T, Nishikawa K, Crain PF, Hashizume T, Pomerantz SC, Mccloskey JA, Kawai G, Hayashi N, Yokoyama S, Watanabe K (1994) A novel modified nucleotide found at the position of the anticodon of methionine tRNA from bovine liver mitochondria. Biochem 33:2234–2239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Muramatsu T, Yokoyama S, Horie N, Matsuda A, Ueda T, Yamaizumi Z, Kuchino Y, Nishimura S, Miyazawa T (1988a) A novel lysine-substituted nucleoside in the first position of the anticodon of minor isoleucine tRNA from Escherichia coli. J Bio Chem 263:9261–9267Google Scholar
  27. Muramatsu T, Nishikawa K, Nemoto F, Kuchino Y, Nishimura S, Miyazawa T, Yokoyama S (1988b) Codon and amino acid specificities of a transfer RNA are both converted by a single post-transcriptional modification. Nature 336:179–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Osawa S, Jukes TH, Watanabe K, Muto A (1992) Recent evidence for evolution of the genetic code. Microbiol Rev 56:229–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Palmer JD, Delwiche CF (1996) Second-hand chloroplasts and the case of the disappearing nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:7432–7435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sibler AP, Dirheimer G, Martin RP (1985) Yeast mitochondrial tRNAIle and tRNAMetm: nucleotide sequence and codon recognition patterns. Nucleic Acids Res 13:1341–1345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takasaki N, Murata S, Saitoh M, Kobayashi T, Park L, Okada N (1994) Species-specific amplification of tRNA-derived short interspersed repetitive elements (SINEs) by retroposition: a process of parasitization of entire genomes during the evolution of salmonids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:10153–10157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van dePeer Y, Rensing SA, Maier U-G, De Wachter R (1996) Substitution rate calibration of small subunit ribosomal RNA identifies chlorarachniophyte endosymbionts as remnants of green algae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:7732–7736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weber F, Dietrich A, Weil JH, M-Drouard L (1990) A potato mitochondrial isoleucine tRNA is coded for by a mitochondrial gene possessing a methionine anticodon. Nucleic Acids Res 18:5027–5030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Megumi Ehara
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yasuko Hayashi-Ishimaru
    • 1
  • Yuji Inagaki
    • 1
  • Takeshi Ohama
    • 1
  1. 1.Biohistory Research HallTakatsuki, OsakaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceOsaka UniversityToyonaka, OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations