Abstract.
Actin is a highly conserved protein although many isoforms exist. In vertebrates and insects the different actin isoforms can be grouped by their amino acid sequence and tissue-specific gene expression into muscle and nonmuscle actins, suggesting that the different actins may have a functional significance. We ask here whether atomic models for G- and F-actins may help to explain this functional diversity. Using a molecular graphics program we have mapped the few amino acids that differ between isoactins. A small number of residues specific for muscle actins are buried in internal positions and some present a remarkable organization. Within the molecule, the replacements observed between muscle and nonmuscle actins are often accompanied by compensatory changes. The others are dispersed on the protein surface, except for a cluster located at the N-terminus which protrudes outward. Only a few of these residues specific for muscle actins are present in known ligand binding sites except the N-terminus, which has a sequence specific for each isoactin and is directly implicated in the binding to myosin. When we simulated the replacements of side chains of residues specific for muscle actins to those specific for nonmuscle actins, the N-terminus appears to be less compact and more flexible in nonmuscle actins. This would represent the first conformational grounds for proposing that muscle and nonmuscle actins may be functionally distinguishable. The rest of the molecule is very similar or identical in all the actins, except for a possible higher internal flexibility in muscle actins. We propose that muscle actin genes have evolved from genes of nonmuscle actins by substitutions leading to some conformational changes in the protruding N-terminus and the internal dynamics of the main body of the protein.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker EN, Hubbard RE (1984) Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 44:97–179
Bork P, Sander C, Valencia A (1992) An ATPase domain common to prokaryotic cell cycle proteins, sugar kinases, actin, and hsp70 heat shock proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:7290–7294
Buckingham ME (1985) Actin and myosin multigene families: their expression during the formation of skeletal muscle. Essays Biochem 20:77–109
Buckingham ME, Alonso S, Barton P, Bugaisky G, Cohen A, Daubas P, Garner I, Minty A, Robert B, Weydert A (1984) Actin and myosin genes, and their expression during myogenesis in the mouse. In: Davidson EH, Firtel RA (eds) Molecular biology of development. AR Liss, New York, pp 275–292
Chaponnier C, Goethals M, Janmey PA, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G, Vandekerckhove J (1995) The specific NH2-terminal sequence AcEEED of α-smooth muscle actin plays a role in polymerization in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Biol 130:887–895
Herman IM (1993) Actin isoforms. Curr Biol 5:48–55
Holmes KC, Kabsch W (1991) Muscle proteins: actin. Curr Biol 1:270–280
Holmes KC, Popp D, Gebhard W, Kabsch W (1990) Atomic model of the actin filament. Nature 347:44–49
Kabsch W, Vandekerckhove J (1992) Structure and function of actin. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 21:49–76
Kabsch W, Mannherz HG, Suck D, Pai EF, Holmes KC (1990) Atomic structure of the actin-DNAse-I complex. Nature 347:37–44
Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, London
Krause M, Wild M, Rosenzweig B, Hirsh D (1989) Wild-type and mutant actin genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Mol Biol 208:381–392
Lehman W, Craig R, Vibert P (1994) Cat+-induced tropomyosin movement in Limulus thin filaments revealed by three dimensional reconstruction. Nature 368:65–67
Lorenz M, Popp D, Holmes KC (1993) Refinement of the F-actin model against X-ray fiber diffraction data by the use of a directed mutation algorithm. J Mol Biol 234:826–836
McLaughlin PJ, Gooch JT, Mannherz HG, Weeds AG (1993) Structure of gelsolin segment-l-actin complex and the mechanism of filament severing. Nature 364:685–692
Mounier N, Sparrow JC (1993) Muscle actin genes in insects. Comp Biochem Physiol 10513:231–238
Mounier N, Gouy M, Mouchiroud D, Prudhomme JC (1992) Insect muscle actins differ distinctly from invertebrate and vertebrate cytoplasmic actins. J Mol Evol 34:406–415
Rayment I, Holden HM, Whittaker M, Yohn CB, Lorenz M, Holmes KC, Milligan RA (1993) Structure of the actin-myosin complex and its implications for muscle contraction. Science 261:58–65
Rubenstein PA (1990) The functional importance of multiple actin isoforms. Bioessays 12:309–315
Schroder RR, Manstein DJ, Jahn W, Holden H, Rayment I, Holmes KC, Spudich JA (1993) Three-dimensional atomic model of F-actin decorated with Dictyostelium myosin-S1. Nature 364:171–174
Schutt CE, Myslik JC, Rozycki MD, Goonesekere NCW, Lindberg U (1993) The structure of crystalline profilin R-actin. Nature 365:810–816
Schutt CE, Rozycki MD, Myslik JC, Lindberg U (1995) A discourse on modeling F-actin. J Struct Biol 115:186–198
Sheterline P, Sparrow JC (1994) Actin. In: Sheterline P (ed) Protein profile, vol 1. Academic Press, London
Vandekerckhove J, Weber K (1978) Mammalian cytoplasmic actins are the products of at least two genes and differ in primary structure in at least 25 identified positions from skeletal muscle actins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:1106–1110
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 15 March 1996 / Accepted: 14 July 1996
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mounier, N., Sparrow, J. Structural Comparisons of Muscle and Nonmuscle Actins Give Insights Into the Evolution of Their Functional Differences. J Mol Evol 44, 89–97 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006125
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006125