Abstract
Poincaré invariance is a well-tested symmetry of nature and sits at the core of our description of relativistic particles and gravity. At the same time, in most systems Poincaré invariance is not a symmetry of the ground state and is hence broken spontaneously. This phenomenon is ubiquitous in cosmology where Lorentz boosts are spontaneously broken by the existence of a preferred reference frame in which the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. This motivates us to study scattering amplitudes without requiring invariance of the interactions under Lorentz boosts. In particular, using on-shell methods and assuming massless, relativistic and luminal particles of any spin, we show that the allowed interactions around Minkowski spacetime are severely constrained by unitarity and locality in the form of consistent factorization. The existence of an interacting massless spin-2 particle enforces (analytically continued) three-particle amplitudes to be Lorentz invariant, even those that do not involve a graviton, such as cubic scalar couplings. We conjecture this to be true for all n-particle amplitudes. Also, particles of spin S > 2 cannot self-interact nor can be minimally coupled to gravity, while particles of spin S > 1 cannot have electric charge. Given the growing evidence that free gravitons are well described by massless, luminal relativistic particles, our results imply that cubic graviton interactions in Minkowski must be those of general relativity up to a unique Lorentz-invariant higher-derivative correction of mass dimension 9. Finally, we point out that consistent factorization for massless particles is highly IR sensitive and therefore our powerful flat-space results do not straightforwardly apply to curved spacetime.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Change history
06 April 2022
An Erratum to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2022)023
References
R. Bluhm, Overview of the SME: Implications and phenomenology of Lorentz violation, Lect. Notes Phys. 702 (2006) 191 [hep-ph/0506054] [INSPIRE].
V. Kostelecky and N. Russell, Data Tables for Lorentz and CPT Violation, arXiv:0801.0287 [INSPIRE].
J.D. Tasson, What Do We Know About Lorentz Invariance?, Rept. Prog. Phys. 77 (2014) 062901 [arXiv:1403.7785] [INSPIRE].
C.M. Will, The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Rev. Rel. 17 (2014) 4 [arXiv:1403.7377] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, What is quantum field theory, and what did we think it is?, in Conference on Historical Examination and Philosophical Reflections on the Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, pp. 241–251, 3, 1996, hep-th/9702027 [INSPIRE].
R.J. Eden, P.V. Landshoff, D.I. Olive and J.C. Polkinghorne, The analytic S-matrix, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (1966).
P. Benincasa, New structures in scattering amplitudes: a review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1430005 [arXiv:1312.5583] [INSPIRE].
H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang, Scattering Amplitudes, arXiv:1308.1697 [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, TASI Lectures on Scattering Amplitudes, in proceedings of Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Anticipating the Next Discoveries in Particle Physics (TASI 2016), Boulder, CO, USA, June 6–July 1, 2016, arXiv:1708.03872, Anticipating the Next Discoveries in Particle Physics (2018), pp. 571–623 [INSPIRE].
R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng, New recursion relations for tree amplitudes of gluons, Nucl. Phys. B 715 (2005) 499 [hep-th/0412308] [INSPIRE].
R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng and E. Witten, Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 181602 [hep-th/0501052] [INSPIRE].
P. Benincasa, C. Boucher-Veronneau and F. Cachazo, Taming Tree Amplitudes In General Relativity, JHEP 11 (2007) 057 [hep-th/0702032] [INSPIRE].
A. Nicolis, R. Penco, F. Piazza and R. Rattazzi, Zoology of condensed matter: Framids, ordinary stuff, extra-ordinary stuff, JHEP 06 (2015) 155 [arXiv:1501.03845] [INSPIRE].
LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL collaborations, Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Astrophys. J. Lett. 848 (2017) L13 [arXiv:1710.05834] [INSPIRE].
L. Alberte and A. Nicolis, Spontaneously broken boosts and the Goldstone continuum, JHEP 07 (2020) 076 [arXiv:2001.06024] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2013 results. XXVII. Doppler boosting of the CMB: Eppur si muove, Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A27 [arXiv:1303.5087] [INSPIRE].
B. Finelli, G. Goon, E. Pajer and L. Santoni, Soft Theorems For Shift-Symmetric Cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 063531 [arXiv:1711.03737] [INSPIRE].
B. Finelli, G. Goon, E. Pajer and L. Santoni, The Effective Theory of Shift-Symmetric Cosmologies, JCAP 05 (2018) 060 [arXiv:1802.01580] [INSPIRE].
A. Nicolis and F. Piazza, Spontaneous Symmetry Probing, JHEP 06 (2012) 025 [arXiv:1112.5174] [INSPIRE].
T. Grall, S. Jazayeri and D. Stefanyszyn, The cosmological phonon: symmetries and amplitudes on sub-horizon scales, JHEP 11 (2020) 097 [arXiv:2005.12937] [INSPIRE].
D. Green and E. Pajer, On the Symmetries of Cosmological Perturbations, JCAP 09 (2020) 032 [arXiv:2004.09587] [INSPIRE].
D. Baumann, D. Green and T. Hartman, Dynamical Constraints on RG Flows and Cosmology, JHEP 12 (2019) 134 [arXiv:1906.10226] [INSPIRE].
S.R. Coleman and J. Mandula, All Possible Symmetries of the S Matrix, Phys. Rev. 159 (1967) 1251 [INSPIRE].
J.M. Maldacena and G.L. Pimentel, On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation, JHEP 09 (2011) 045 [arXiv:1104.2846] [INSPIRE].
S. Raju, New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 126009 [arXiv:1201.6449] [INSPIRE].
E. Pajer, The Symmetries of Cosmological Correlators, https://drive.google.com/file/d/15BG9LiUziqxUWB4-CTW7OIFoRL3YTOSC/view.
P. Creminelli, Conformal invariance of scalar perturbations in inflation, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 041302 [arXiv:1108.0874] [INSPIRE].
I. Mata, S. Raju and S. Trivedi, CMB from CFT, JHEP 07 (2013) 015 [arXiv:1211.5482] [INSPIRE].
A. Ghosh, N. Kundu, S. Raju and S.P. Trivedi, Conformal Invariance and the Four Point Scalar Correlator in Slow-Roll Inflation, JHEP 07 (2014) 011 [arXiv:1401.1426] [INSPIRE].
N. Kundu, A. Shukla and S.P. Trivedi, Constraints from Conformal Symmetry on the Three Point Scalar Correlator in Inflation, JHEP 04 (2015) 061 [arXiv:1410.2606] [INSPIRE].
N. Kundu, A. Shukla and S.P. Trivedi, Ward Identities for Scale and Special Conformal Transformations in Inflation, JHEP 01 (2016) 046 [arXiv:1507.06017] [INSPIRE].
E. Pajer, G.L. Pimentel and J.V.S. Van Wijck, The Conformal Limit of Inflation in the Era of CMB Polarimetry, JCAP 06 (2017) 009 [arXiv:1609.06993] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, D. Baumann, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel, The Cosmological Bootstrap: Inflationary Correlators from Symmetries and Singularities, JHEP 04 (2020) 105 [arXiv:1811.00024] [INSPIRE].
D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel, The Cosmological Bootstrap: Weight-Shifting Operators and Scalar Seeds, arXiv:1910.14051 [INSPIRE].
C. Sleight, A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators, JHEP 01 (2020) 090 [arXiv:1906.12302] [INSPIRE].
C. Sleight and M. Taronna, Bootstrapping Inflationary Correlators in Mellin Space, JHEP 02 (2020) 098 [arXiv:1907.01143] [INSPIRE].
D. Baumann, C. Duaso Pueyo, A. Joyce, H. Lee and G.L. Pimentel, The Cosmological Bootstrap: Spinning Correlators from Symmetries and Factorization, arXiv:2005.04234 [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, Cosmological Collider Physics, arXiv:1503.08043 [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, P. Benincasa and A. Postnikov, Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe, arXiv:1709.02813 [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed and P. Benincasa, On the Emergence of Lorentz Invariance and Unitarity from the Scattering Facet of Cosmological Polytopes, arXiv:1811.01125 [INSPIRE].
P. Benincasa, From the flat-space S-matrix to the Wavefunction of the Universe, arXiv:1811.02515 [INSPIRE].
P. Benincasa, Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefuncton of the Universe for Light States, arXiv:1909.02517 [INSPIRE].
A. Hillman, Symbol Recursion for the dS Wave Function, arXiv:1912.09450 [INSPIRE].
P. Creminelli and F. Vernizzi, Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 251302 [arXiv:1710.05877] [INSPIRE].
J. Sakstein and B. Jain, Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 251303 [arXiv:1710.05893] [INSPIRE].
E.J. Copeland, M. Kopp, A. Padilla, P.M. Saffin and C. Skordis, Dark energy after GW170817 revisited, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 061301 [arXiv:1810.08239] [INSPIRE].
L. Bordin, E.J. Copeland and A. Padilla, Dark energy loopholes some time after GW170817, arXiv:2006.06652 [INSPIRE].
LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaborations, GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 161101 [arXiv:1710.05832] [INSPIRE].
A. Goldstein et al., An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A, Astrophys. J. Lett. 848 (2017) L14 [arXiv:1710.05446] [INSPIRE].
V. Kostelecký and J.D. Tasson, Constraints on Lorentz violation from gravitational Čerenkov radiation, Phys. Lett. B 749 (2015) 551 [arXiv:1508.07007] [INSPIRE].
C. Talmadge, J.P. Berthias, R.W. Hellings and E.M. Standish, Model Independent Constraints on Possible Modifications of Newtonian Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 1159 [INSPIRE].
LIGO Scientific, Virgo collaborations, Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 221101 [Erratum ibid. 121 (2018) 129902] [arXiv:1602.03841] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, J.T. Deskins, A.J. Tolley and S.-Y. Zhou, Graviton Mass Bounds, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2017) 025004 [arXiv:1606.08462] [INSPIRE].
S.R. Choudhury, G.C. Joshi, S. Mahajan and B.H.J. McKellar, Probing large distance higher dimensional gravity from lensing data, Astropart. Phys. 21 (2004) 559 [hep-ph/0204161] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, A. Gruzinov and M. Zaldarriaga, The Accelerated universe and the moon, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 024012 [hep-ph/0212069] [INSPIRE].
M.P. Hertzberg and M. Sandora, Special Relativity from Soft Gravitons, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 084048 [arXiv:1704.05071] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons, Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) B516 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s equations, Phys. Rev. 138 (1965) B988 [INSPIRE].
P. Benincasa and F. Cachazo, Consistency Conditions on the S-matrix of Massless Particles, arXiv:0705.4305 [INSPIRE].
V. Kostelecky, Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 105009 [hep-th/0312310] [INSPIRE].
J. Khoury, G.E.J. Miller and A.J. Tolley, On the Origin of Gravitational Lorentz Covariance, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 135011 [arXiv:1305.0822] [INSPIRE].
H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 494 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0812.1594] [INSPIRE].
M.P. Hertzberg, J.A. Litterer and M. Sandora, Symmetries from locality. II. Gravitation and Lorentz boosts, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 025023 [arXiv:2005.01744] [INSPIRE].
M.P. Hertzberg and J.A. Litterer, Symmetries from locality. I. Electromagnetism and charge conservation, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 025022 [arXiv:2005.01731] [INSPIRE].
D.A. McGady and L. Rodina, Higher-spin massless S-matrices in four-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 084048 [arXiv:1311.2938] [INSPIRE].
P.C. Schuster and N. Toro, Constructing the Tree-Level Yang-Mills S-matrix Using Complex Factorization, JHEP 06 (2009) 079 [arXiv:0811.3207] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang and Y.-t. Huang, Scattering Amplitudes For All Masses and Spins, arXiv:1709.04891 [INSPIRE].
M.D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2014).
S. Weinberg, The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2005).
S.J. Parke and T.R. Taylor, An Amplitude for n Gluon Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 2459 [INSPIRE].
A.R. White, The Past and future of S matrix theory, hep-ph/0002303 [INSPIRE].
M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder, An Introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, U.S.A. (1995), corrections at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/ mpeskin/QFT.html.
C. Chandler, Causality in S matrix theory, Phys. Rev. 174 (1968) 1749 [Erratum ibid. 179 (1969) 1632] [INSPIRE].
A. Peres, Causality in S matrix theory, Ann. Phys. 37 (1966) 179.
D. Olive, Exploration of s-matrix theory, Phys. Rev. 135 (1964) 745.
P. Benincasa and E. Conde, Exploring the S-matrix of Massless Particles, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 025007 [arXiv:1108.3078] [INSPIRE].
Z. Bern, J.J.M. Carrasco and H. Johansson, New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 085011 [arXiv:0805.3993] [INSPIRE].
D. Ponomarev and E.D. Skvortsov, Light-Front Higher-Spin Theories in Flat Space, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 095401 [arXiv:1609.04655] [INSPIRE].
D. Baumann, D. Green, H. Lee and R.A. Porto, Signs of Analyticity in Single-Field Inflation, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 023523 [arXiv:1502.07304] [INSPIRE].
X. Bekaert, N. Boulanger and P. Sundell, How higher-spin gravity surpasses the spin two barrier: no-go theorems versus yes-go examples, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 987 [arXiv:1007.0435] [INSPIRE].
T. Grall and S. Melville, Inflation in motion: unitarity constraints in effective field theories with (spontaneously) broken Lorentz symmetry, JCAP 09 (2020) 017 [arXiv:2005.02366] [INSPIRE].
N. Afshordi, D.J.H. Chung and G. Geshnizjani, Cuscuton: A Causal Field Theory with an Infinite Speed of Sound, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 083513 [hep-th/0609150] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2007.00027
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Pajer, E., Stefanyszyn, D. & Supeł, J. The boostless bootstrap: amplitudes without Lorentz boosts. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)198
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)198