Do black holes create polyamory?
Of course not, but if one believes that information cannot be destroyed in a theory of quantum gravity, then we run into apparent contradictions with quantum theory when we consider evaporating black holes. Namely that the no-cloning theorem or the principle of entanglement monogamy is violated. Here, we show that neither violation need hold, since, in arguing that black holes lead to cloning or non-monogamy, one needs to assume a tensor product structure between two points in space-time that could instead be viewed as causally connected. In the latter case, one is violating the semi-classical causal structure of space, which is a strictly weaker implication than cloning or non-monogamy. This is because both cloning and non-monogamy also lead to a break-down of the semi-classical causal structure. We show that the lack of monogamy that can emerge in evaporating space times is one that is allowed in quantum mechanics, and is very naturally related to a lack of monogamy of correlations of outputs of measurements performed at subsequent instances of time of a single system. This is due to an interesting duality between temporal correlations and entanglement. A particular example of this is the Horowitz-Maldacena proposal, and we argue that it needn’t lead to cloning or violations of entanglement monogamy. For measurements on systems which appear to be leaving a black hole, we introduce the notion of the temporal product, and argue that it is just as natural a choice for measurements as the tensor product. For black holes, the tensor and temporal products have the same measurement statistics, but result in different type of non-monogamy of correlations, with the former being forbidden in quantum theory while the latter is allowed. In the case of the AMPS firewall experiment we find that the entanglement structure is modified, and one must have entanglement between the infalling Hawking partners and early time outgoing Hawking radiation which surprisingly tames the violation of entanglement monogamy.
KeywordsBlack Holes Spacetime Singularities
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- M. Koashi and A. Winter, Monogamy of quantum entanglement and other correlations, Phys. Rev. A 69 (2004) 022309 [quant-ph/0310037].
- R.M. Wald, Space, time, and gravity: the theory of the big bang and black holes, University of Chicago Press, U.S.A., (1992).Google Scholar
- C.H. Bennett, Simulated Time Travel, Teleportation without communication, and How to conduct a Romance with Someone who has fallen into a black hole, talk available at http://web.archive.org/web/20070206131550/http://www.research.ibm.com/people/b/bennetc/QUPONBshort.pdf, (2005).
- G. ’t Hooft, On the Quantum Structure of a Black Hole, Nucl. Phys. B 256 (1985) 727 [INSPIRE].
- G. ’t Hooft, The black hole interpretation of string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 335 (1990) 138 [INSPIRE].
- B. Toner et al., Monogamy of Bell correlations and Tsirelson’s bound, quant-ph/0611001.
- T. Banks, L. Susskind and M.E. Peskin, Difficulties for the Evolution of Pure States Into Mixed States, Nucl. Phys. B 244 (1984) 125 [INSPIRE].
- D. Dieks, Communication by EPR devices, Phys. Lett. A 92 (1982) 271 [INSPIRE].