Abstract
The covariant phase space method of Iyer, Lee, Wald, and Zoupas gives an elegant way to understand the Hamiltonian dynamics of Lagrangian field theories without breaking covariance. The original literature however does not systematically treat total derivatives and boundary terms, which has led to some confusion about how exactly to apply the formalism in the presence of boundaries. In particular the original construction of the canonical Hamiltonian relies on the assumed existence of a certain boundary quantity “B”, whose physical interpretation has not been clear. We here give an algorithmic procedure for applying the covariant phase space formalism to field theories with spatial boundaries, from which the term in the Hamiltonian involving B emerges naturally. Our procedure also produces an additional boundary term, which was not present in the original literature and which so far has only appeared implicitly in specific examples, and which is already nonvanishing even in general relativity with sufficiently permissive boundary conditions. The only requirement we impose is that at solutions of the equations of motion the action is stationary modulo future/past boundary terms under arbitrary variations obeying the spatial boundary conditions; from this the symplectic structure and the Hamiltonian for any diffeomorphism that preserves the theory are unambiguously constructed. We show in examples that the Hamiltonian so constructed agrees with previous results. We also show that the Poisson bracket on covariant phase space directly coincides with the Peierls bracket, without any need for non-covariant intermediate steps, and we discuss possible implications for the entropy of dynamical black hole horizons.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
E. Witten, Interacting Field Theory of Open Superstrings, Nucl. Phys. B 276 (1986) 291 [INSPIRE].
G.J. Zuckerman, ACTION principles and global geometry, in Mathematical Aspects of String Theory, World Scientific (1987) [Conf. Proc. C 8607214 (1986) 259] [INSPIRE].
C. Crnkovic and E. Witten, Covariant description of canonical formalism in geometrical theories, in Three hundred years of gravitation, pp. 676–684, Cambridge University Press (1987) [INSPIRE].
C. Crnkovic, Symplectic Geometry of the Covariant Phase Space, Superstrings and Superspace, Class. Quant. Grav. 5 (1988) 1557 [INSPIRE].
J. Lee and R.M. Wald, Local symmetries and constraints, J. Math. Phys. 31 (1990) 725 [INSPIRE].
R.M. Wald, Black hole entropy is the Noether charge, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3427 [gr-qc/9307038] [INSPIRE].
V. Iyer and R.M. Wald, Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 846 [gr-qc/9403028] [INSPIRE].
V. Iyer and R.M. Wald, A Comparison of Noether charge and Euclidean methods for computing the entropy of stationary black holes, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 4430 [gr-qc/9503052] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Wald and A. Zoupas, A General definition of ‘conserved quantities’ in general relativity and other theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 084027 [gr-qc/9911095] [INSPIRE].
I. Khavkine, Covariant phase space, constraints, gauge and the Peierls formula, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1430009 [arXiv:1402.1282] [INSPIRE].
S. Hollands, A. Ishibashi and D. Marolf, Comparison between various notions of conserved charges in asymptotically AdS-spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 2881 [hep-th/0503045] [INSPIRE].
G. Compere and D. Marolf, Setting the boundary free in AdS/CFT, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 195014 [arXiv:0805.1902] [INSPIRE].
T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R.C. Myers and M. Van Raamsdonk, Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs, JHEP 03 (2014) 051 [arXiv:1312.7856] [INSPIRE].
T. Andrade, W.R. Kelly, D. Marolf and J.E. Santos, On the stability of gravity with Dirichlet walls, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 235006 [arXiv:1504.07580] [INSPIRE].
D.L. Jafferis, A. Lewkowycz, J. Maldacena and S.J. Suh, Relative entropy equals bulk relative entropy, JHEP 06 (2016) 004 [arXiv:1512.06431] [INSPIRE].
N. Lashkari, J. Lin, H. Ooguri, B. Stoica and M. Van Raamsdonk, Gravitational positive energy theorems from information inequalities, PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C109 [arXiv:1605.01075] [INSPIRE].
X. Dong, D. Harlow and D. Marolf, Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity, JHEP 10 (2019) 240 [arXiv:1811.05382] [INSPIRE].
A. Belin, A. Lewkowycz and G. Sárosi, The boundary dual of the bulk symplectic form, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 71 [arXiv:1806.10144] [INSPIRE].
A. Belin, A. Lewkowycz and G. Sárosi, Complexity and the bulk volume, a new York time story, JHEP 03 (2019) 044 [arXiv:1811.03097] [INSPIRE].
G. Compere and F. Dehouck, Relaxing the Parity Conditions of Asymptotically Flat Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 245016 [Erratum ibid. 30 (2013) 039501] [arXiv:1106.4045] [INSPIRE].
V. Chandrasekaran, E.E. Flanagan and K. Prabhu, Symmetries and charges of general relativity at null boundaries, JHEP 11 (2018) 125 [arXiv:1807.11499] [INSPIRE].
S. Carlip, Entropy from conformal field theory at Killing horizons, Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) 3327 [gr-qc/9906126] [INSPIRE].
S. Haco, S.W. Hawking, M.J. Perry and A. Strominger, Black Hole Entropy and Soft Hair, JHEP 12 (2018) 098 [arXiv:1810.01847] [INSPIRE].
S. Haco, M.J. Perry and A. Strominger, Kerr-Newman Black Hole Entropy and Soft Hair, arXiv:1902.02247 [INSPIRE].
T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, Role of Surface Integrals in the Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity, Annals Phys. 88 (1974) 286 [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking and G.T. Horowitz, The Gravitational Hamiltonian, action, entropy and surface terms, Class. Quant. Grav. 13 (1996) 1487 [gr-qc/9501014] [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking and C.J. Hunter, The Gravitational Hamiltonian in the presence of nonorthogonal boundaries, Class. Quant. Grav. 13 (1996) 2735 [gr-qc/9603050] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Wald, On identically closed forms locally constructed from a field, J. Math. Phys. 31 (1990) 2378.
B. Julia and S. Silva, On covariant phase space methods, hep-th/0205072 [INSPIRE].
I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, Thermodynamics of asymptotically locally AdS spacetimes, JHEP 08 (2005) 004 [hep-th/0505190] [INSPIRE].
T. Andrade and D. Marolf, Asymptotic Symmetries from finite boxes, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 015013 [arXiv:1508.02515] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly and S.B. Giddings, Observables, gravitational dressing, and obstructions to locality and subsystems, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 104038 [arXiv:1607.01025] [INSPIRE].
S.B. Giddings and A. Kinsella, Gauge-invariant observables, gravitational dressings, and holography in AdS, JHEP 11 (2018) 074 [arXiv:1802.01602] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich and F. Brandt, Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges, Nucl. Phys. B 633 (2002) 3 [hep-th/0111246] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich and G. Compere, Surface charge algebra in gauge theories and thermodynamic integrability, J. Math. Phys. 49 (2008) 042901 [arXiv:0708.2378] [INSPIRE].
S. Almaraz, E. Barbosa and L.L. de Lima, A positive mass theorem for asymptotically flat manifolds with a non-compact boundary, Commun. Anal. Geom. 24 (2016) 673 [arXiv:1407.0673] [INSPIRE].
S. Almaraz and L.L. de Lima, The mass of an asymptotically hyperbolic manifold with a noncompact boundary, arXiv:1811.06913 [INSPIRE].
S. Almaraz, L.L. de Lima and L. Mari, Spacetime positive mass theorems for initial data sets with noncompact boundary, arXiv:1907.02023 [INSPIRE].
K. Prabhu, The First Law of Black Hole Mechanics for Fields with Internal Gauge Freedom, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 035011 [arXiv:1511.00388] [INSPIRE].
V.I. Arnold, V.V. Kozlov and A.I. Neishtadt, Mathematical aspects of classical and celestial mechanics, vol. 3, Springer Science & Business Media (2007) [DOI].
E. Noether, Invariant Variation Problems, Transp. Theory Statist. Phys. 1 (1971) 186 [Gott. Nachr. 1918 (1918) 235] [physics/0503066] [INSPIRE].
S. Lang, Fundamentals of differential geometry, vol. 191, Springer Science & Business Media (2012) [DOI].
J.E. Marsden, Lectures on geometric methods in mathematical physics, SIAM (1981) [DOI].
R. Abraham, J.E. Marsden and J.E. Marsden, Foundations of mechanics, vol. 36, Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Reading, Massachusetts (1978).
R.M. Wald, General Relativity, Chicago University Press, Chicago, U.S.A. (1984) [DOI] [INSPIRE].
S.M. Carroll, Spacetime and geometry: An introduction to general relativity, Addison-Wesley (2004) [INSPIRE].
J. Brown and J.W. York Jr., Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 1407 [gr-qc/9209012] [INSPIRE].
R.L. Arnowitt, S. Deser and C.W. Misner, The Dynamics of general relativity, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 1997 [gr-qc/0405109] [INSPIRE].
C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 126 (1983) 41 [INSPIRE].
R. Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 252 (1985) 343 [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 11 (2015) 014 [arXiv:1402.6334] [INSPIRE].
K. Jensen, Chaos in AdS2 Holography, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 111601 [arXiv:1605.06098] [INSPIRE].
J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C104 [arXiv:1606.01857] [INSPIRE].
J. Engelsöy, T.G. Mertens and H. Verlinde, An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography, JHEP 07 (2016) 139 [arXiv:1606.03438] [INSPIRE].
J. Navarro-Salas, M. Navarro and V. Aldaya, Covariant phase space quantization of the Jackiw-Teitelboim model of 2-D gravity, Phys. Lett. B 292 (1992) 19 [INSPIRE].
M. Henneaux, Quantum gravity in two-dimensions: exact solution of the Jackiw model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 959 [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow and D. Jafferis, The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity, JHEP 02 (2020) 177 [arXiv:1804.01081] [INSPIRE].
R.E. Peierls, The Commutation laws of relativistic field theory, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 214 (1952) 143 [INSPIRE].
M. Forger and S.V. Romero, Covariant poisson brackets in geometric field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 256 (2005) 375 [math-ph/0408008] [INSPIRE].
D.M. Marolf, The Generalized Peierls bracket, Annals Phys. 236 (1994) 392 [hep-th/9308150] [INSPIRE].
J. Margalef-Bentabol and E.J.S. Villaseñor, Geometric formulation of the Covariant Phase Space methods with boundaries, arXiv:2008.01842 [INSPIRE].
A. Ashtekar and R.O. Hansen, A unified treatment of null and spatial infinity in general relativity. I — Universal structure, asymptotic symmetries, and conserved quantities at spatial infinity, J. Math. Phys. 19 (1978) 1542 [INSPIRE].
M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Asymptotically anti-de Sitter Spaces, Commun. Math. Phys. 98 (1985) 391 [INSPIRE].
A. Ashtekar, L. Bombelli and O. Reula, The covariant phase space of asymptotically flat gravitational fields, in Analysis, Geometry, and Mechanics: 200 Years After Lagrange, M. Francaviglia and D. Holm eds., North Holland, Amsterdam (1990) [INSPIRE].
R. Bartnik, Phase space for the Einstein equations, gr-qc/0402070 [INSPIRE].
X. Dong, Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity, JHEP 01 (2014) 044 [arXiv:1310.5713] [INSPIRE].
A.C. Wall, A Second Law for Higher Curvature Gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24 (2015) 1544014 [arXiv:1504.08040] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly and A.C. Wall, Entanglement entropy of electromagnetic edge modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 111603 [arXiv:1412.1895] [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow, Wormholes, Emergent Gauge Fields, and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 01 (2016) 122 [arXiv:1510.07911] [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity, JHEP 09 (2016) 102 [arXiv:1601.04744] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Speranza, Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories, JHEP 02 (2018) 021 [arXiv:1706.05061] [INSPIRE].
J. Kirklin, Unambiguous Phase Spaces for Subregions, JHEP 03 (2019) 116 [arXiv:1901.09857] [INSPIRE].
B.S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. 1. The Canonical Theory, Phys. Rev. 160 (1967) 1113 [INSPIRE].
G. Hayward, Gravitational action for space-times with nonsmooth boundaries, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 3275 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 1906.08616
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Harlow, D., Wu, Jq. Covariant phase space with boundaries. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 146 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)146
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)146