Abstract
We present the implementation of Higgs boson pair production in gluon fusion within a non-linear Effective Field Theory framework containing five anomalous couplings for this process. The code, available within the POWHEG-BOX-V2, includes full NLO QCD corrections with massive top quarks. All five couplings can be modified by the user. We show mhh distributions at seven benchmark points provided by an mhh shape analysis at NLO and showered \( {p}_T^{hh} \) distributions resulting from an interface to PYTHIA-8 and HERWIG-7.2.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ATLAS collaboration, Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 80 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 012002 [arXiv:1909.02845] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement and interpretation of differential cross sections for Higgs boson production at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 792 (2019) 369 [arXiv:1812.06504] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Combination of searches for Higgs boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 121803 [arXiv:1811.09689] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Combination of searches for Higgs boson pairs in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 800 (2020) 135103 [arXiv:1906.02025] [INSPIRE].
O.J.P. Eboli, G.C. Marques, S.F. Novaes and A.A. Natale, Twin Higgs boson production, Phys. Lett. B 197 (1987) 269 [INSPIRE].
E.W. Glover and J.J. van der Bij, Higgs boson pair production via gluon fusion, Nucl. Phys. B 309 (1988) 282 [INSPIRE].
T. Plehn, M. Spira and P.M. Zerwas, Pair production of neutral Higgs particles in gluon-gluon collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 479 (1996) 46 [Erratum ibid. 531 (1998) 655] [hep-ph/9603205] [INSPIRE].
S. Borowka et al., Higgs boson pair production in gluon fusion at next-to-leading order with full top-quark mass dependence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 012001 [Erratum ibid. 117 (2016) 079901] [arXiv:1604.06447] [INSPIRE].
S. Borowka et al., Full top quark mass dependence in Higgs boson pair production at NLO, JHEP 10 (2016) 107 [arXiv:1608.04798] [INSPIRE].
J. Baglio, F. Campanario, S. Glaus, M. Mühlleitner, M. Spira and J. Streicher, Gluon fusion into Higgs pairs at NLO QCD and the top mass scheme, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 459 [arXiv:1811.05692] [INSPIRE].
J. Baglio et al., Higgs-pair production via gluon fusion at hadron colliders: NLO QCD corrections, JHEP 04 (2020) 181 [arXiv:2003.03227] [INSPIRE].
G. Heinrich, S.P. Jones, M. Kerner, G. Luisoni and E. Vryonidou, NLO predictions for Higgs boson pair production with full top quark mass dependence matched to parton showers, JHEP 08 (2017) 088 [arXiv:1703.09252] [INSPIRE].
S. Jones and S. Kuttimalai, Parton shower and NLO-matching uncertainties in Higgs boson pair production, JHEP 02 (2018) 176 [arXiv:1711.03319] [INSPIRE].
G. Heinrich, S.P. Jones, M. Kerner, G. Luisoni and L. Scyboz, Probing the trilinear Higgs boson coupling in di-Higgs production at NLO QCD including parton shower effects, JHEP 06 (2019) 066 [arXiv:1903.08137] [INSPIRE].
S. Dawson, S. Dittmaier and M. Spira, Neutral Higgs boson pair production at hadron colliders: QCD corrections, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 115012 [hep-ph/9805244] [INSPIRE].
F. Maltoni, E. Vryonidou and M. Zaro, Top-quark mass effects in double and triple Higgs production in gluon-gluon fusion at NLO, JHEP 11 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1408.6542] [INSPIRE].
D. de Florian and J. Mazzitelli, Two-loop virtual corrections to Higgs pair production, Phys. Lett. B 724 (2013) 306 [arXiv:1305.5206] [INSPIRE].
D. de Florian and J. Mazzitelli, Higgs boson pair production at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 201801 [arXiv:1309.6594] [INSPIRE].
J. Grigo, K. Melnikov and M. Steinhauser, Virtual corrections to Higgs boson pair production in the large top quark mass limit, Nucl. Phys. B 888 (2014) 17 [arXiv:1408.2422] [INSPIRE].
D. de Florian et al., Differential Higgs boson pair production at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, JHEP 09 (2016) 151 [arXiv:1606.09519] [INSPIRE].
M. Grazzini et al., Higgs boson pair production at NNLO with top quark mass effects, JHEP 05 (2018) 059 [arXiv:1803.02463] [INSPIRE].
D. De Florian and J. Mazzitelli, Soft gluon resummation for Higgs boson pair production including finite Mt effects, JHEP 08 (2018) 156 [arXiv:1807.03704] [INSPIRE].
L.-B. Chen, H.T. Li, H.-S. Shao and J. Wang, Higgs boson pair production via gluon fusion at N3 LO in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 803 (2020) 135292 [arXiv:1909.06808] [INSPIRE].
L.-B. Chen, H.T. Li, H.-S. Shao and J. Wang, The gluon-fusion production of Higgs boson pair: N3 LO QCD corrections and top-quark mass effects, JHEP 03 (2020) 072 [arXiv:1912.13001] [INSPIRE].
S. Amoroso et al., Les Houches 2019: physics at TeV colliders: standard model working group Report, in the proceedings of the 11th Les Houches Workshop on Physics at TeV Colliders: PhysTeV Les Houches, June 10–28, Les Houches, France (2019), arXiv:2003.01700 [INSPIRE].
M. Cepeda et al., Report from working group 2: Higgs physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 7 (2019) 221 [arXiv:1902.00134] [INSPIRE].
J. Alison et al., Higgs boson pair production at colliders: status and perspectives, in the proceedings of the Double Higgs production at colliders workshop, September 4–9, Fermilab, U.S.A. (2019) [arXiv:1910.00012] [INSPIRE].
S. Dawson, C. Englert and T. Plehn, Higgs physics: it ain’t over till it’s over, Phys. Rept. 816 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1808.01324] [INSPIRE].
G. Buchalla, M. Capozi, A. Celis, G. Heinrich and L. Scyboz, Higgs boson pair production in non-linear effective field theory with full mt -dependence at NLO QCD, JHEP 09 (2018) 057 [arXiv:1806.05162] [INSPIRE].
P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP 11 (2004) 040 [hep-ph/0409146] [INSPIRE].
S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP 11 (2007) 070 [arXiv:0709.2092] [INSPIRE].
S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP 06 (2010) 043 [arXiv:1002.2581] [INSPIRE].
M. Capozi and G. Heinrich, Exploring anomalous couplings in Higgs boson pair production through shape analysis, JHEP 03 (2020) 091 [arXiv:1908.08923] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
J. Bellm et al., HERWIG 7.1 release note, arXiv:1705.06919 [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, M.B. Gavela, L. Merlo, S. Rigolin and J. Yepes, The effective chiral lagrangian for a light dynamical “Higgs particle”, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 330 [Erratum ibid. 726 (2013) 926] [arXiv:1212.3305] [INSPIRE].
G. Buchalla, O. Catà and C. Krause, Complete Electroweak Chiral Lagrangian with a Light Higgs at NLO, Nucl. Phys. B 880 (2014) 552 [Erratum ibid. 913 (2016) 475] [arXiv:1307.5017] [INSPIRE].
G. Buchalla, O. Catá and C. Krause, On the power counting in effective field theories, Phys. Lett. B 731 (2014) 80 [arXiv:1312.5624] [INSPIRE].
A. Carvalho, M. Dall’Osso, T. Dorigo, F. Goertz, C.A. Gottardo and M. Tosi, Higgs pair production: choosing benchmarks with cluster analysis, JHEP 04 (2016) 126 [arXiv:1507.02245] [INSPIRE].
R. Grober, M. Muhlleitner, M. Spira and J. Streicher, NLO QCD corrections to Higgs pair production including dimension-6 operators, JHEP 09 (2015) 092 [arXiv:1504.06577] [INSPIRE].
G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].
C. Arzt, M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Patterns of deviation from the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 433 (1995) 41 [hep-ph/9405214] [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov, R. Contino, G. Panico and M. Son, Effective field theory analysis of double Higgs boson production via gluon fusion, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 035001 [arXiv:1502.00539] [INSPIRE].
C. Studerus, Reduze-Feynman integral reduction in C++, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 1293 [arXiv:0912.2546] [INSPIRE].
A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus, Reduze 2 — Distributed Feynman integral reduction, arXiv:1201.4330 [INSPIRE].
S. Borowka, G. Heinrich, S.P. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk and T. Zirke, SecDec-3.0: numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals beyond one loop, Comput. Phys. Commun. 196 (2015) 470 [arXiv:1502.06595] [INSPIRE].
S. Borowka et al., pySecDec: a toolbox for the numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 313 [arXiv:1703.09692] [INSPIRE].
G. Cullen et al., Automated one-loop calculations with GoSam, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1889 [arXiv:1111.2034] [INSPIRE].
G. Cullen et al., GoSam-2.0: a tool for automated one-loop calculations within the Standard Model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3001 [arXiv:1404.7096] [INSPIRE].
G. Luisoni, P. Nason, C. Oleari and F. Tramontano, H W ± /H Z + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with the POWHEG BOX interfaced to GoSam and their merging within MiNLO, JHEP 10 (2013) 083 [arXiv:1306.2542] [INSPIRE].
C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer and T. Reiter, UFO — The Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1201 [arXiv:1108.2040] [INSPIRE].
A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
J. Butterworth et al., PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 023001 [arXiv:1510.03865] [INSPIRE].
S. Dulat et al., New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 033006 [arXiv:1506.07443] [INSPIRE].
L.A. Harland-Lang, A.D. Martin, P. Motylinski and R.S. Thorne, Parton distributions in the LHC era: MMHT 2014 PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 204 [arXiv:1412.3989] [INSPIRE].
NNPDF collaboration, Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, JHEP 04 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1410.8849] [INSPIRE].
A. Buckley et al., LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1412.7420] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari and G.P. Salam, Dispelling the N 3 myth for the kt jet-finder, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 57 [hep-ph/0512210] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].
S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, NLO Higgs boson production via gluon fusion matched with shower in POWHEG, JHEP 04 (2009) 002 [arXiv:0812.0578] [INSPIRE].
S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re, NLO single-top production matched with shower in POWHEG: s- and t-channel contributions, JHEP 09 (2009) 111 [Erratum ibid. 02 (2010) 011] [arXiv:0907.4076] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2006.16877
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Heinrich, G., Jones, S.P., Kerner, M. et al. A non-linear EFT description of gg → H H at NLO interfaced to POWHEG. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)021
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)021