Abstract
We briefly review the formulation of effective field theories (EFTs) in timedependent situations, with particular attention paid to their domain of validity. Our main interest is the extent to which solutions of the EFT capture the dynamics of the full theory. For a simple model we show by explicit calculation that the low-energy action obtained from a sensible UV completion need not take the restrictive form required to obtain only secondorder field equations, and we clarify why runaway solutions are nevertheless typically not a problem for the EFT. Although our results will not be surprising to many, to our knowledge they are only mentioned tangentially in the EFT literature, which (with a few exceptions) largely addresses time-independent situations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A 96 (1979) 327 [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi, Effective field theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43 (1993) 209 [INSPIRE].
D.B. Kaplan, Effective field theories, nucl-th/9506035 [INSPIRE].
A.V. Manohar, Effective field theories, in Perturbative and nonperturbative aspects of quantum field theory, Schladming (1996) 311 [hep-ph/9606222] [INSPIRE].
I.Z. Rothstein, TASI lectures on effective field theories, hep-ph/0308266 [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, Introduction to Effective Field Theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 329 [hep-th/0701053] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel. 7 (2004) 5 [gr-qc/0311082] [INSPIRE].
W.D. Goldberger, Les Houches lectures on effective field theories and gravitational radiation, hep-ph/0701129 [INSPIRE].
J.F. Donoghue, The effective field theory treatment of quantum gravity, AIP Conf. Proc. 1483 (2012) 73 [arXiv:1209.3511] [INSPIRE].
C. Vafa, The String landscape and the swampland, hep-th/0509212 [INSPIRE].
A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP 10 (2006) 014 [hep-th/0602178] [INSPIRE].
D. Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations, J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 498 [INSPIRE].
G.W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10 (1974) 363 [INSPIRE].
A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, The Galileon as a local modification of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064036 [arXiv:0811.2197] [INSPIRE].
C. Deffayet, G. Esposito-Farese and A. Vikman, Covariant Galileon, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 084003 [arXiv:0901.1314] [INSPIRE].
C. Deffayet, S. Deser and G. Esposito-Farese, Generalized Galileons: All scalar models whose curved background extensions maintain second-order field equations and stress-tensors, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 064015 [arXiv:0906.1967] [INSPIRE].
C. Deffayet and D.A. Steer, A formal introduction to Horndeski and Galileon theories and their generalizations, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 214006 [arXiv:1307.2450] [INSPIRE].
C. Charmousis, E.J. Copeland, A. Padilla and P.M. Saffin, General second order scalar-tensor theory, self tuning and the Fab Four, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 051101 [arXiv:1106.2000] [INSPIRE].
C. Charmousis, E.J. Copeland, A. Padilla and P.M. Saffin, Self-tuning and the derivation of a class of scalar-tensor theories, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104040 [arXiv:1112.4866] [INSPIRE].
E.J. Copeland, A. Padilla and P.M. Saffin, The cosmology of the Fab-Four, JCAP 12 (2012) 026 [arXiv:1208.3373] [INSPIRE].
N. Chow and J. Khoury, Galileon Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 024037 [arXiv:0905.1325] [INSPIRE].
H. Collins, R. Holman and A. Ross, Effective field theory in time-dependent settings, JHEP 02 (2013) 108 [arXiv:1208.3255] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore, The Effective Field Theory of Inflation, JHEP 03 (2008) 014 [arXiv:0709.0293] [INSPIRE].
D. Baumann, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmological Non-Linearities as an Effective Fluid, JCAP 07 (2012) 051 [arXiv:1004.2488] [INSPIRE].
J. Polchinski, String Theory, vols 1 and 2, Cambridge University Press.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1404.2236
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Burgess, C.P., Williams, M. Who you gonna call? Runaway ghosts, higher derivatives and time-dependence in EFTs. J. High Energ. Phys. 2014, 74 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2014)074
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2014)074