Abstract
In effective quantum field theory, a spin-1 vector boson can have a technically natural small mass that does not originate from the Higgs mechanism. For such theories, which may be written in Stückelberg form, there is no point in field space at which the mass is exactly zero. I argue that quantum gravity differs from, and constrains, effective field theory: arbitrarily small Stückelberg masses are forbidden. In particular, the limit in which the mass goes to zero lies at infinite distance in field space, and this distance is correlated with a tower of modes becoming light according to the Swampland Distance Conjecture. Application of Tower or Sublattice variants of the Weak Gravity Conjecture makes this statement more precise: for a spin-1 vector boson with coupling constant e and Stückelberg mass m, local quantum field theory breaks down at energies at or below ΛUV = min((mMPl/e)1/2, e1/3MPl). Combined with phenomenological constraints, this argument implies that the Standard Model photon must be exactly massless. It also implies that much of the parameter space for light dark photons, which are the target of many experimental searches, is compatible only with Higgs and not Stückelberg mass terms. This significantly affects the experimental limits and cosmological histories of such theories. I explain various caveats and weak points of the arguments, including loopholes that could be targets for model-building.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A. Proca, Sur la theorie ondulatoire des electrons positifs et negatifs, J. Phys. Radium7 (1936) 347 [INSPIRE].
L. Bass and E. Schrödinger, Must the photon mass be zero?, Proc. Roy. Soc. LondonA 232 (1955) 1.
B.G.G. Chen et al., Lectures of Sidney Coleman on quantum field theory, World Scientific, Singapore (2019).
J. Heeck, How stable is the photon?, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 021801 [arXiv:1304.2821] [INSPIRE].
X.-F. Wu et al., Constraints on the photon mass with fast radio bursts, Astrophys. J.822 (2016) L15 [arXiv:1602.07835] [INSPIRE].
L. Bonetti et al., Photon mass limits from fast radio bursts, Phys. Lett.B 757 (2016) 548 [arXiv:1602.09135] [INSPIRE].
L. Bonetti et al., FRB 121102 casts new light on the photon mass, Phys. Lett.B 768 (2017) 326 [arXiv:1701.03097] [INSPIRE].
A.S. Goldhaber and M.M. Nieto, Photon and graviton mass limits, Rev. Mod. Phys.82 (2010) 939 [arXiv:0809.1003] [INSPIRE].
L. Davis, Jr., A.S. Goldhaber and M.M. Nieto, Limit on the photon mass deduced from Pioneer-10 observations of Jupiter’s m agnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.35 (1975) 1402 [INSPIRE].
D.D. Ryutov, Using plasma physics to weigh the photon, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion49 (2007) B429 [INSPIRE].
D.D. Ryutov, Relating the Proca photon mass and cosmic vector potential via solar wind, Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (2009) 201803 [INSPIRE].
G.V. Chibisov, Astrophysical upper limits on the photon rest mass, Sov. Phys. Usp.19 (1976) 624 [INSPIRE].
A. Retinò, A.D. A.M. Spallicci and A. Vaivads, Solar wind test of the de Broglie-Proca massive photon with Cluster multi-spacecraft data, Astropart. Phys.82 (2016) 49 [arXiv:1302.6168] [INSPIRE].
E. Adelberger, G. Dvali and A. Gruzinov, Photon mass bound destroyed by vortices, Phys. Rev. Lett.98 (2007) 010402 [hep-ph/0306245] [INSPIRE].
Y. Liang and A. Czarnecki, Photon-photon scattering: a tutorial, Can. J. Phys.90 (2012) 11 [arXiv:1111.6126] [INSPIRE].
L. Heisenberg, Generalization of the Proca action, JCAP05 (2014) 015 [arXiv:1402.7026] [INSPIRE].
J. Beltran Jimenez and L. Heisenberg, Derivative self-interactions for a massive vector field, Phys. Lett.B 757 (2016) 405 [arXiv:1602.03410] [INSPIRE].
T.A. Chowdhury, R. Rahman and Z.A. Sabuj, Gravitational properties of the Proca field, Nucl. Phys.B 936 (2018) 364 [arXiv:1807.10284] [INSPIRE].
T. Banks and L.J. Dixon, Constraints on string vacua with space-time supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys.B 307 (1988) 93 [INSPIRE].
M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell, Planck scale physics and the Peccei-Quinn mechanism, Phys. Lett.B 282 (1992) 137 [hep-th/9202003] [INSPIRE].
R. Holman et al., Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity, Phys. Lett.B 282 (1992)132 [hep-ph/9203206] [INSPIRE].
R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and L. Susskind, Gravity and global symmetries, Phys. Rev.D 52 (1995) 912 [hep-th/9502069] [INSPIRE].
T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Symmetries and strings in field theory and gravity, Phys. Rev.D 83 (2011) 084019 [arXiv:1011.5120] [INSPIRE].
C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, hep-th/0509212 [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, The string landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP06 (2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001] [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland, Nucl. Phys.B 766 (2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264] [INSPIRE].
T.D. Brennan, F. Carta and C. Vafa, The string landscape, the swampland and the missing corner, PoS(TASI2017)015 [arXiv:1711.00864] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Sharpening the weak gravity conjecture with dimensional reduction, JHEP02 (2016) 140 [arXiv:1509.06374] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Evidence for a sublattice weak gravity conjecture, JHEP08 (2017) 025 [arXiv:1606.08437] [INSPIRE].
M. Montero, G. Shiu and P. Soler, The weak gravity conjecture in three dimensions, JHEP10 (2016) 159 [arXiv:1606.08438] [INSPIRE].
S. Andriolo, D. Junghans, T. Noumi and G. Shiu, A tower weak gravity conjecture from infrared consistency, Fortsch. Phys.66 (2018) 1800020 [arXiv:1802.04287] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, The weak gravity conjecture and emergence from an ultraviolet cutoff, Eur. Phys. J.C 78 (2018) 337 [arXiv:1712.01868] [INSPIRE].
E.C.G. Stueckelberg, Interaction energy in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces, Helv. Phys. Acta11 (1938) 225 [INSPIRE].
L.E. Ibáñez and A.M. Uranga, String theory and particle physics: an introduction to string phenomenology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2012).
F. Quevedo, Is string phenomenology an oxymoron?, arXiv:1612.01569 [INSPIRE].
M. Dine, N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Fayet-Iliopoulos terms in string theory, Nucl. Phys.B 289 (1987) 589 [INSPIRE].
G. Aldazabal, A. Font, L.E. Ibáñez and G. Violero, D = 4, N = 1, type IIB orientifolds, Nucl. Phys.B 536 (1998) 29 [hep-th/9804026] [INSPIRE].
L.E. Ibáñez, R. Rabadán and A.M. Uranga, Anomalous U(1)’s in type-I and type IIB D = 4, N =1 string vacua,Nucl. Phys.B 542(1999) 112 [hep-th/9808139] [INSPIRE].
L.E. Ibáñez, R. Rabadán and A.M. Uranga, σ-model anomalies in compact D = 4, N = 1 type IIB orientifolds and Fayet-Iliopoulos terms, Nucl. Phys.B 576 (2000) 285 [hep-th/9905098] [INSPIRE].
L.E. Ibáñez and F. Quevedo, Anomalous U(1)’s and proton stability in brane models, JHEP10 (1999) 001 [hep-ph/9908305] [INSPIRE].
I. Antoniadis, E. Kiritsis and J. Rizos, Anomalous U(1)’s in type 1 superstring vacua, Nucl. Phys.B 637 (2002) 92 [hep-th/0204153] [INSPIRE].
P. Anastasopoulos, 4 − D anomalous U(1)’s, their masses and their relation to 6 – D anomalies, JHEP08 (2003) 005 [hep-th/0306042] [INSPIRE].
P. Anastasopoulos, M. Bianchi, E. Dudas and E. Kiritsis, Anomalies, anomalous U(1)’s and generalized Chern-Simons terms, JHEP11 (2006) 057 [hep-th/0605225] [INSPIRE].
F. Baume and E. Palti, Backreacted axion field ranges in string theory, JHEP08 (2016) 043 [arXiv:1602.06517] [INSPIRE].
D. Klaewer and E. Palti, Super-Planckian spatial field variations and quantum gravity, JHEP01 (2017) 088 [arXiv:1610.00010] [INSPIRE].
R. Blumenhagen, I. Valenzuela and F. Wolf, The swampland conjecture and F-term axion monodromy inflation, JHEP07 (2017) 145 [arXiv:1703.05776] [INSPIRE].
M. Cicoli, D. Ciupke, C. Mayrhofer and P. Shukla, A geometrical upper bound on the inflaton range, JHEP05 (2018) 001 [arXiv:1801.05434] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Emergence of weak coupling at large distance in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 051601 [arXiv:1802.08698] [INSPIRE].
T.W. Grimm, E. Palti and I. Valenzuela, Infinite distances in field space and massless towers of states, JHEP08 (2018) 143 [arXiv:1802.08264] [INSPIRE].
A. Nicolis, On super-planckian fields at sub-Planckian energies, JHEP07 (2008) 023 [arXiv:0802.3923] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Dolan, P. Draper, J. Kozaczuk and H. Patel, Transplanckian censorship and global cosmic strings, JHEP04 (2017) 133 [arXiv:1701.05572] [INSPIRE].
P.W. Graham, J. Mardon and S. Rajendran, Vector dark matter from inflationary fluctuations, Phys. Rev.D 93 (2016) 103520 [arXiv:1504.02102] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Some properties of O(32) superstrings, Phys. Lett.B 149 (1984) 351.
K. Choi and J.E. Kim, Harmful axions in superstring models, Phys. Lett.B 154 (1985) 393 [Erratum ibid. B 156 (1985) 452].
S.M. Barr, Harmless axions in superstring theories, Phys. Lett.B 158 (1985) 397.
J.P. Conlon, The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation, JHEP05 (2006) 078 [hep-th/0602233] [INSPIRE].
P. Svrček and E. Witten, Axions in string theory, JHEP06 (2006) 051 [hep-th/0605206] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, P. Creminelli and L. Randall, Extra natural inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.90 (2003) 221302 [hep-th/0301218] [INSPIRE].
D. Berenstein and E. Perkins, Open string axions and the flavor problem, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 026005 [arXiv:1202.2073] [INSPIRE].
G. Honecker and W. Staessens, On axionic dark matter in Type IIA string theory, Fortsch. Phys.62 (2014) 115 [arXiv:1312.4517] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and S. Kachru, Predictive landscapes and new physics at a TeV, hep-th/0501082 [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem, Fortsch. Phys.58 (2010) 528 [arXiv:0706.2050] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and M. Redi, Black hole bound on the number of species and quantum gravity at LHC, Phys. Rev.D 77 (2008) 045027 [arXiv:0710.4344] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and D. Lüst, Evaporation of microscopic black holes in string theory and the bound on species, Fortsch. Phys.58 (2010) 505 [arXiv:0912.3167] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Species and strings, arXiv:1004.3744 [INSPIRE].
M.J. Bowick et al., Axionic black holes and a Bohm-Aharonov effect for strings, Phys. Rev. Lett.61 (1988) 2823 [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker and P. Soler, The weak gravity conjecture and the axionic black hole paradox, JHEP09 (2017) 036 [arXiv:1702.06130] [INSPIRE].
N. Kaloper and A. Lawrence, London equation for monodromy inflation, Phys. Rev.D 95 (2017) 063526 [arXiv:1607.06105] [INSPIRE].
M. Montero, A.M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela, A Chern-Simons pandemic, JHEP07 (2017) 123 [arXiv:1702.06147] [INSPIRE].
A.A. Abrikosov, On the magnetic properties of superconductors of the second group, Sov. Phys. JETP5 (1957) 1174 [INSPIRE].
H.B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings, Nucl. Phys.B 61 (1973) 45 [INSPIRE].
M. Mirbabayi and A. Gruzinov, Black hole discharge in massive electrodynamics and black hole disappearance in massive gravity, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 064008 [arXiv:1303.2665] [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow, Wormholes, emergent gauge fields and the weak gravity conjecture, JHEP01 (2016) 122 [arXiv:1510.07911] [INSPIRE].
I. Antoniadis, E. Kiritsis and T.N. Tomaras, A D-brane alternative to unification, Phys. Lett.B 486 (2000) 186 [hep-ph/0004214] [INSPIRE].
E. Kiritsis and P. Anastasopoulos, The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the D-brane realization of the standard model, JHEP05 (2002) 054 [hep-ph/0201295] [INSPIRE].
M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo and A. Ringwald, Naturally light hidden photons in LARGE volume string compactifications, JHEP11 (2009) 027 [arXiv:0909.0515] [INSPIRE].
M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, Testing string vacua in the lab: from a hidden CMB to dark forces in flux compactifications, JHEP07 (2011) 114 [arXiv:1103.3705] [INSPIRE].
W.-Z. Feng, G. Shiu, P. Soler and F. Ye, Probing hidden sectors with Stückelberg U(1) gauge fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 061802 [arXiv:1401.5880] [INSPIRE].
W.-Z. Feng, G. Shiu, P. Soler and F. Ye, Building a Stückelberg portal, JHEP05 (2014) 065 [arXiv:1401.5890] [INSPIRE].
S. Davidson, S. Hannestad and G. Raffelt, Updated bounds on millicharged particles, JHEP05 (2000) 003 [hep-ph/0001179] [INSPIRE].
H. Vogel and J. Redondo, Dark radiation constraints on minicharged particles in models with a hidden photon, JCAP02 (2014) 029 [arXiv:1311.2600] [INSPIRE].
J.H. Chang, R. Essig and S.D. McDermott, Supernova 1987A constraints on sub-GeV dark sectors, millicharged particles, the QCD axion and an axion-like particle, JHEP09 (2018) 051 [arXiv:1803.00993] [INSPIRE].
L.E. Ibáñez and M. Montero, A note on the WGC, effective field theory and clockwork within string theory, JHEP02 (2018) 057 [arXiv:1709.02392] [INSPIRE].
B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Weak gravity strongly constrains large-field axion inflation, JHEP12 (2015) 108 [arXiv:1506.03447] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig et al., Working group report: new light weakly coupled particles, in the proceedings of the 2013 Community Summer Study on the Future of U.S. Particle Physics: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013), July 29–August 6, Minneapolis, U.S.A. (2013), arXiv:1311.0029 [INSPIRE].
W. Hu, R. Barkana and A. Gruzinov, Cold and fuzzy dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.85 (2000) 1158 [astro-ph/0003365] [INSPIRE].
A.E. Nelson and J. Scholtz, Dark light, dark matter and the misalignment mechanism, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 103501 [arXiv:1105.2812] [INSPIRE].
P. Arias et al., WISPy cold dark matter, JCAP06 (2012) 013 [arXiv:1201.5902] [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal et al., Relic abundance of dark photon dark matter, arXiv:1810.07188 [INSPIRE].
N. Afkhami-Jeddi, S. Kundu and A. Tajdini, A conformal collider for holographic CFTs, JHEP10 (2018) 156 [arXiv:1805.07393] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1808.09966
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Reece, M. Photon masses in the landscape and the swampland. J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 181 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2019)181
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2019)181