Abstract
In this work, we formulate a path-integral optimization for two dimensional conformal field theories perturbed by relevant operators. We present several evidences how this optimization mechanism works, based on calculations in free field theories as well as general arguments of RG flows in field theories. Our optimization is performed by minimizing the path-integral complexity functional that depends on the metric and also on the relevant couplings. Then, we compute the optimal metric perturbatively and find that it agrees with the time slice of the hyperbolic metric perturbed by a scalar field in the AdS/CFT correspondence. Last but not the least, we estimate contributions to complexity from relevant perturbations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J.M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE].
E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE].
J. de Boer, E.P. Verlinde and H.L. Verlinde, On the holographic renormalization group, JHEP 08 (2000) 003 [hep-th/9912012] [INSPIRE].
K. Skenderis, Lecture notes on holographic renormalization, Class. Quant. Grav. 19 (2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067] [INSPIRE].
S.R. Das and A. Jevicki, Large N collective fields and holography, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 044011 [hep-th/0304093] [INSPIRE].
I. Heemskerk and J. Polchinski, Holographic and Wilsonian Renormalization Groups, JHEP 06 (2011) 031 [arXiv:1010.1264] [INSPIRE].
T. Faulkner, H. Liu and M. Rangamani, Integrating out geometry: Holographic Wilsonian RG and the membrane paradigm, JHEP 08 (2011) 051 [arXiv:1010.4036] [INSPIRE].
S.-S. Lee, Quantum Renormalization Group and Holography, JHEP 01 (2014) 076 [arXiv:1305.3908] [INSPIRE].
P. Caputa, N. Kundu, M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Anti-de Sitter Space from Optimization of Path Integrals in Conformal Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 071602 [arXiv:1703.00456] [INSPIRE].
M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, From path integrals to tensor networks for the AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 066004 [arXiv:1609.04645] [INSPIRE].
B. Swingle, Entanglement Renormalization and Holography, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065007 [arXiv:0905.1317] [INSPIRE].
G. Vidal, A class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 110501 [quant-ph/0610099].
G. Vidal, Entanglement Renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 220405 [cond-mat/0512165] [INSPIRE].
G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Tensor Network Renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 180405 [arXiv:1412.0732].
G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Tensor network renormalization yields the multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 200401 [arXiv:1502.05385].
J. Haegeman, T.J. Osborne, H. Verschelde and F. Verstraete, Entanglement Renormalization for Quantum Fields in Real Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 100402 [arXiv:1102.5524] [INSPIRE].
M. Nozaki, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Geometry of Entanglement Renormalization in Quantum Field Theories, JHEP 10 (2012) 193 [arXiv:1208.3469] [INSPIRE].
A. Mollabashi, M. Nozaki, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Geometry of cMERA for Quantum Quenches and Finite Temperature, JHEP 03 (2014) 098 [arXiv:1311.6095] [INSPIRE].
F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence, JHEP 06 (2015) 149 [arXiv:1503.06237] [INSPIRE].
P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang, Holographic duality from random tensor networks, JHEP 11 (2016) 009 [arXiv:1601.01694] [INSPIRE].
M. Miyaji and T. Takayanagi, Surface/State Correspondence as a Generalized Holography, PTEP 2015 (2015) 073B03 [arXiv:1503.03542] [INSPIRE].
P. Caputa, N. Kundu, M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Liouville Action as Path-Integral Complexity: From Continuous Tensor Networks to AdS/CFT, JHEP 11 (2017) 097 [arXiv:1706.07056] [INSPIRE].
B. Czech, Einstein Equations from Varying Complexity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 031601 [arXiv:1706.00965] [INSPIRE].
D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 126007 [arXiv:1406.2678] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 44 [arXiv:1403.5695] [INSPIRE].
A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 191301 [arXiv:1509.07876] [INSPIRE].
A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Complexity, action and black holes, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 086006 [arXiv:1512.04993] [INSPIRE].
L. Lehner, R.C. Myers, E. Poisson and R.D. Sorkin, Gravitational action with null boundaries, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 084046 [arXiv:1609.00207] [INSPIRE].
S. Chapman, M.P. Heller, H. Marrochio and F. Pastawski, Toward a Definition of Complexity for Quantum Field Theory States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 121602 [arXiv:1707.08582] [INSPIRE].
R. Jefferson and R.C. Myers, Circuit complexity in quantum field theory, JHEP 10 (2017) 107 [arXiv:1707.08570] [INSPIRE].
J. Molina-Vilaplana and A. Del Campo, Complexity Functionals and Complexity Growth Limits in Continuous MERA Circuits, arXiv:1803.02356 [INSPIRE].
R. Khan, C. Krishnan and S. Sharma, Circuit Complexity in Fermionic Field Theory, arXiv:1801.07620 [INSPIRE].
L. Hackl and R.C. Myers, Circuit complexity for free fermions, arXiv:1803.10638 [INSPIRE].
A.M. Polyakov, Quantum Geometry of Bosonic Strings, Phys. Lett. B 103 (1981) 207 [INSPIRE].
P.H. Ginsparg and G.W. Moore, Lectures on 2-D gravity and 2-D string theory, hep-th/9304011.
K. Gawedzki, Lectures on Conformal Field Theory, in Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians, Vol. 2, American Mathematical Society, (1999), https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cca2/78b7cf71c3e9730852d3bf5f64233aa1db9e.pdf .
F. Ferrari, S. Klevtsov and S. Zelditch, Gravitational Actions in Two Dimensions and the Mabuchi Functional, Nucl. Phys. B 859 (2012) 341 [arXiv:1112.1352] [INSPIRE].
F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, Geometric entropy, wave functionals and fermions, Annals Phys. 243 (1995) 280 [hep-th/9408089] [INSPIRE].
H. Osborn, Weyl consistency conditions and a local renormalization group equation for general renormalizable field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 363 (1991) 486 [INSPIRE].
D. Friedan and A. Konechny, Gradient formula for the β-function of 2d quantum field theory, J. Phys. A 43 (2010) 215401 [arXiv:0910.3109] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nakayama, Canceling the Weyl anomaly from a position-dependent coupling, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 045008 [arXiv:1711.06413] [INSPIRE].
I.R. Klebanov and E. Witten, AdS/CFT correspondence and symmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 556 (1999) 89 [hep-th/9905104] [INSPIRE].
T. Takayanagi, Holographic Dual of BCFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 101602 [arXiv:1105.5165] [INSPIRE].
M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi and E. Tonni, Aspects of AdS/BCFT, JHEP 11 (2011) 043 [arXiv:1108.5152] [INSPIRE].
L.-Y. Hung, R.C. Myers and M. Smolkin, Some Calculable Contributions to Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 08 (2011) 039 [arXiv:1105.6055] [INSPIRE].
M. Miyaji, T. Numasawa, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Distance between Quantum States and Gauge-Gravity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 261602 [arXiv:1507.07555] [INSPIRE].
M. Miyaji, Butterflies from Information Metric, JHEP 09 (2016) 002 [arXiv:1607.01467] [INSPIRE].
D. Carmi, More on Holographic Volumes, Entanglement and Complexity, arXiv:1709.10463 [INSPIRE].
M. Flory, A complexity/fidelity susceptibility g-theorem for AdS 3 /BCFT 2, JHEP 06 (2017) 131 [arXiv:1702.06386] [INSPIRE].
M. Alishahiha and A. Faraji Astaneh, Holographic Fidelity Susceptibility, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 086004 [arXiv:1705.01834] [INSPIRE].
P. Rath, Holographic Complexity, Perimeter Scholars International essay (unpublished) (2016).
M. Moosa, Divergences in the rate of complexification, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 106016 [arXiv:1712.07137] [INSPIRE].
D. Carmi, R.C. Myers and P. Rath, Comments on Holographic Complexity, JHEP 03 (2017) 118 [arXiv:1612.00433] [INSPIRE].
A. Bhattacharyya, A. Sinha and A. Shekar, Complexity in an interacting QFT, to appear.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1804.01999
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhattacharyya, A., Caputa, P., Das, S.R. et al. Path-integral complexity for perturbed CFTs. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 86 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2018)086
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2018)086