Skip to main content
Log in

Discovery reach for generic supersymmetry at the LHC: M T2 versus missing transverse momentum selections for pMSSM searches

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different search strategies for supersymmetry have been employed by the LHC general-purpose experiments using early data. As proven by their early results, these strategies are promising, but raise the question of how well they will generalize for the future. We address this question by studying two thousand phenomenological minimal supersymmetric standard model parameter space points that come from a fit to indirect and cosmological data. We examine the 5σ discoverability of the points employing a typical ATLAS-type search based on missing transverse momentum (MET), a search based on an optimised M T2 cut and a combination of the two, taking into account standard model backgrounds. The discovery reach of the strategies can depend strongly on the systematic uncertainty in the background, subject to the stringency of the cuts and the details of the background simulation. By combining the MET and M T2 based strategies, with an integrated luminosity of 1 fb−1 (10 fb−1) at 7 TeV, 4-8%(42%) of the points are discoverable, depending on the systematic uncertainty on the background. At 14TeVand with10fb−1, 96% of the points are discoverable. While the majority of points can be discovered by both strategies at \( \sqrt {s} = 14 \) TeV and with 1fb−1, there are some that are left undiscovered by a MET search strategy, but which are discovered by the M T2 strategy, and vice versa, therefore it is essential that one performs both in parallel. We discuss some of the factors that can make points more difficult to observe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Expected performance of the ATLAS experiment — detector, trigger and physics, arXiv:0901.0512 [SPIRES].

  2. G.L. Bayatian et al., CMS physics technical design report, volume II: physics performance, J. Phys. G 34 (2006) 995 [CERN-LHCC-2006-021] [CMS-TDR-008-2] [SPIRES].

    Google Scholar 

  3. ATLAS collaboration, J.B.G. da Costa et al., Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV proton-proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B 701 (2011) 186 [arXiv:1102.5290] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. CMS collaboration, V. Khachatryan et al., Search for supersymmetry in pp collisions at 7TeV in events with jets and missing transverse energy, Phys. Lett. B 698 (2011) 196 [arXiv:1101.1628] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C.G. Lester and D.J. Summers, Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 463 (1999) 99 [hep-ph/9906349] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Barr, C. Lester and P. Stephens, M T2 : the truth behind the glamour, J. Phys. G 29 (2003) 2343 [hep-ph/0304226] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.J. Barr and C. Gwenlan, The race for supersymmetry: using M T2 for discovery, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 074007 [arXiv:0907.2713] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. J.A. Conley, J.S. Gainer, J.L. Hewett, M.P. Le and T.G. Rizzo, Supersymmetry without prejudice at the LHC, arXiv:1009.2539 [SPIRES].

  9. J.A. Conley, J.S. Gainer, J.L. Hewett, M.P. Le and T.G. Rizzo, Supersymmetry without prejudice at the 7TeV LHC, arXiv:1103.1697 [SPIRES].

  10. S.S. Abdus Salam, B.C. Allanach, F. Quevedo, F. Feroz and M. Hobson, Fitting the phenomenological MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 095012 [arXiv:0904.2548] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Feroz and M.P. Hobson, Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis, arXiv:0704.3704 [SPIRES].

  12. F. Feroz, M.P. Hobson and M. Bridges, MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, arXiv:0809.3437 [SPIRES].

  13. B.C. Allanach et al., The Snowmass points and slopes: benchmarks for SUSY searches, Eur. Phys. J. C 25 (2002) 113 [hep-ph/0202233] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Prospects for Supersymmetry discovery based on inclusive searches at a 7TeV centre-of-mass energy with the ATLAS detector, technical report, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2010-010,CERN,Geneva Switzerland(2010).

  15. H.-C. Cheng and Z. Han, Minimal kinematic constraints and M T2, JHEP 12 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0810.5178] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Early supersymmetry searches in channels with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector, technical report, ATLAS-CONF-2010-065, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2010).

  17. M. Bahr et al., HERWIG++ physics and manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 639 [arXiv:0803.0883] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Gieseke et al., HERW IG++ 2.5 release note, arXiv:1102.1672 [SPIRES].

  19. P.Z. Skands et al., SUSY Les Houches accord: interfacing SUSY spectrum calculators, decay packages and event generators, JHEP 07 (2004) 036 [hep-ph/0311123] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Cacciari and G.P. Salam, Dispelling the N 3 myth for the k t jet-finder, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 57 [hep-ph/0512210] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-k t jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [SPIRES].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. R.D. Cousins, J.T. Linnemann and J. Tucker, Evaluation of three methods for calculating statistical significance when incorporating a systematic uncertainty into a test of the background-only hypothesis for a Poisson process, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 595 (2008) 480 [SPIRES].

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Buckley, PySLHA homepage, http://www.insectnation.org/projects/pyslha.

  24. E. Lytken, Searches for direct slepton production with ATLAS, Czech. J. Phys. 54 (2004) A169 [SPIRES].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C.-Y. Chen and A. Freitas, General analysis of signals with two leptons and missing energy at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 02 (2011) 002 [arXiv:1011.5276] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. D.S.M. Alves, E. Izaguirre and J.G. Wacker, Where the sidewalk ends: jets and missing energy search strategies for the 7TeV LHC, arXiv:1102.5338 [SPIRES].

  27. J. Alwall, M.-P. Le, M. Lisanti and J.G. Wacker, Searching for directly decaying gluinos at the Tevatron, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 34 [arXiv:0803.0019] [SPIRES].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandru Dafinca.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint:1105.1024

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allanach, B.C., Barr, A.J., Dafinca, A. et al. Discovery reach for generic supersymmetry at the LHC: M T2 versus missing transverse momentum selections for pMSSM searches. J. High Energ. Phys. 2011, 104 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2011)104

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2011)104

Keywords

Navigation