Abstract
New experiments dealing with neutrinos in the far-forward region at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) are under design or already in preparation. Two of them, FASERν and SND@LHC, are expected to be active during Run 3 and have the potential to detect the interactions of ν and \( \overline{\nu} \) that come from high-energy collisions in one of the LHC interaction points, extracted along the direction tangent to the beam line. Tau neutrinos and antineutrinos come predominantly from \( {D}_s^{\pm } \) production in pp collisions, followed by the leptonic decay of these mesons. Neutrino pseudorapidities in the range of η > 6.9 and η > 8.9 are relevant to these future experiments. At such pseudorapidities at high energies, QCD theoretical predictions for the flux of ντ plus \( \overline{\nu} \)τ rely on parton distribution functions (PDFs) in a combination of very small and large parton−x values. We evaluate PDF un certainties affecting the flux of ντ + \( \overline{\nu} \)τ produced by \( {D}_s^{\pm } \) decay in the far forward region at the LHC. Next-to-leading order (NLO) QCD uncertainties are included in the calculation of \( {D}_s^{\pm } \) production and NLO PDF sets are used for consistency. The theoretical uncertainty associated with the 40 PDF sets of the PROSA19 group amounts to ±(20 − 30)% for the (ντ + \( \overline{\nu} \)τ) number of charged-current (CC) events. Scale uncertainties are much larger, resulting in a range of CC event predictions from ~70% lower to ~90% higher than the central prediction. A comparison of the predictions with those obtained using as input the central PDFs from the 3-flavour NLO PDF sets of the CT14, ABMP16 and NNPDF3.1 collaborations show that far-forward neutrino energy distributions vary by as much as a factor of ~2 – 4 relative to the PROSA19 predictions at TeV neutrino energies. The Forward Physics Facility in the high luminosity LHC era will provide data capable of constraining NLO QCD evaluations with these PDF sets.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A. De Rujula and R. Ruckl, Neutrino and muon physics in the collider mode of future accelerators, in SSC Workshop: Superconducting Super Collider Fixed Target Physics, (1984), pp. 571–596, DOI [INSPIRE].
K. Winter, Detection of the tau-neutrino at the LHC, in ECFA Large Hadron Collider Workshop: Proceedings. 2, Aachen, Germany, October 4–9, 1990 p. 37 [INSPIRE].
A. De Rujula, E. Fernandez and J.J. Gomez-Cadenas, Neutrino fluxes at future hadron colliders, Nucl. Phys. B 405 (1993) 80 [INSPIRE].
F. Vannucci, Neutrino physics at LHC / SSC, in 5th International Symposium on Neutrino Telescopes, Venice, Italy, March 2–4, 1993 p. 57, http://lss.fnal.gov/archive/other/lpnhe-93-03.pdf.
FASER collaboration, Detecting and Studying High-Energy Collider Neutrinos with FASER at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 61 [arXiv:1908.02310] [INSPIRE].
FASER collaboration, Technical Proposal: FASERnu, arXiv:2001.03073 [INSPIRE].
S. Buontempo, G.M. Dallavalle, G. De Lellis, D. Lazic and F.L. Navarria, CMS-XSEN: LHC Neutrinos at CMS. Experiment Feasibility Study, arXiv:1804.04413 [INSPIRE].
XSEN collaboration, XSEN: a νN Cross Section Measurement using High Energy Neutrinos from pp collisions at the LHC, arXiv:1910.11340 [INSPIRE].
SHiP collaboration, SND@LHC, arXiv:2002.08722 [INSPIRE].
FASER collaboration, First neutrino interaction candidates at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) L091101 [arXiv:2105.06197] [INSPIRE].
L.A. Anchordoqui et al., The Forward Physics Facility: Sites, experiments, and physics potential, Phys. Rept. 968 (2022) 1 [arXiv:2109.10905] [INSPIRE].
J.L. Feng et al., The Forward Physics Facility at the High-Luminosity LHC, arXiv:2203.05090 [INSPIRE].
E949 collaboration, Upper Limit on the Branching Ratio for the Decay π0 → ν\( \overline{\nu} \), Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 091102 [hep-ex/0506028] [INSPIRE].
NA62 collaboration, Measurement of the very rare K+ → π+ν\( \overline{\nu} \) decay, JHEP 06 (2021) 093 [arXiv:2103.15389] [INSPIRE].
W. Bai, M. Diwan, M.V. Garzelli, Y.S. Jeong and M.H. Reno, Far-forward neutrinos at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 06 (2020) 032 [arXiv:2002.03012] [INSPIRE].
H. Park, The estimation of neutrino fluxes produced by proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 14 TeV of the LHC, JHEP 10 (2011) 092 [arXiv:1110.1971] [INSPIRE].
N. Beni et al., Further studies on the physics potential of an experiment using LHC neutrinos, J. Phys. G 47 (2020) 125004 [arXiv:2004.07828] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurements of prompt charm production cross-sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 5 TeV, JHEP 06 (2017) 147 [arXiv:1610.02230] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Prompt charm production in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 7 TeV, Nucl. Phys. B 871 (2013) 1 [arXiv:1302.2864] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurements of prompt charm production cross-sections in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2016) 159 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2016) 013] [Erratum ibid. 05 (2017) 074] [arXiv:1510.01707] [INSPIRE].
P. Nason, S. Dawson and R.K. Ellis, The Total Cross-Section for the Production of Heavy Quarks in Hadronic Collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 303 (1988) 607 [INSPIRE].
P. Nason, S. Dawson and R.K. Ellis, The One Particle Inclusive Differential Cross-Section for Heavy Quark Production in Hadronic Collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 327 (1989) 49 [Erratum ibid. 335 (1990) 260] [INSPIRE].
M.L. Mangano, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, Heavy quark correlations in hadron collisions at next-to-leading order, Nucl. Phys. B 373 (1992) 295 [INSPIRE].
H1 and ZEUS collaborations, Combination of measurements of inclusive deep inelastic e±p scattering cross sections and QCD analysis of HERA data, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 580 [arXiv:1506.06042] [INSPIRE].
H1 and ZEUS collaborations, Combination and QCD analysis of charm and beauty production cross-section measurements in deep inelastic ep scattering at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 473 [arXiv:1804.01019] [INSPIRE].
PROSA collaboration, Improved constraints on parton distributions using LHCb, ALICE and HERA heavy-flavour measurements and implications for the predictions for prompt atmospheric-neutrino fluxes, JHEP 04 (2020) 118 [arXiv:1911.13164] [INSPIRE].
PROSA collaboration, Impact of heavy-flavour production cross sections measured by the LHCb experiment on parton distribution functions at low x, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 396 [arXiv:1503.04581] [INSPIRE].
R. Gauld, J. Rojo, L. Rottoli, S. Sarkar and J. Talbert, The prompt atmospheric neutrino flux in the light of LHCb, JHEP 02 (2016) 130 [arXiv:1511.06346] [INSPIRE].
R. Gauld and J. Rojo, Precision determination of the small-x gluon from charm production at LHCb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 072001 [arXiv:1610.09373] [INSPIRE].
V. Bertone, R. Gauld and J. Rojo, Neutrino Telescopes as QCD Microscopes, JHEP 01 (2019) 217 [arXiv:1808.02034] [INSPIRE].
NNPDF collaboration, Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, JHEP 04 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1410.8849] [INSPIRE].
NNPDF collaboration, Parton distributions from high-precision collider data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 663 [arXiv:1706.00428] [INSPIRE].
S. Dulat, T.-J. Hou, J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, P. Nadolsky et al., New parton distribution functions from a global analysis of quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 033006 [arXiv:1506.07443] [INSPIRE].
S. Alekhin, J. Blümlein and S. Moch, NLO PDFs from the ABMP16 fit, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 477 [arXiv:1803.07537] [INSPIRE].
L.A. Harland-Lang, A.D. Martin, P. Motylinski and R.S. Thorne, Charm and beauty quark masses in the MMHT2014 global PDF analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 10 [arXiv:1510.02332] [INSPIRE].
S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP 11 (2007) 070 [arXiv:0709.2092] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand, The PYTHIA Event Generator: Past, Present and Future, Comput. Phys. Commun. 246 (2020) 106910 [arXiv:1907.09874] [INSPIRE].
C. Peterson, D. Schlatter, I. Schmitt and P.M. Zerwas, Scaling Violations in Inclusive e+e− Annihilation Spectra, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 105 [INSPIRE].
A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordström, B. Page, M. Rüfenacht et al., LHAPDF6: parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 132 [arXiv:1412.7420] [INSPIRE].
M. Benzke, M.V. Garzelli, B. Kniehl, G. Kramer, S. Moch and G. Sigl, Prompt neutrinos from atmospheric charm in the general-mass variable-flavor-number scheme, JHEP 12 (2017) 021 [arXiv:1705.10386] [INSPIRE].
A. Accardi et al., A Critical Appraisal and Evaluation of Modern PDFs, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 471 [arXiv:1603.08906] [INSPIRE].
K.G. Chetyrkin and M. Steinhauser, The Relation between the MS-bar and the on-shell quark mass at order \( {\alpha}_s^3 \), Nucl. Phys. B 573 (2000) 617 [hep-ph/9911434] [INSPIRE].
P. Marquard, A.V. Smirnov, V.A. Smirnov and M. Steinhauser, Quark Mass Relations to Four-Loop Order in Perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 142002 [arXiv:1502.01030] [INSPIRE].
R.D. Ball, Charm Production: Pole Mass or Running Mass?, AIP Conf. Proc. 1819 (2017) 030002 [arXiv:1612.03790] [INSPIRE].
M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, N. Houdeau, M.L. Mangano, P. Nason and G. Ridolfi, Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2012) 137 [arXiv:1205.6344] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].
L. Apanasevich et al., kT effects in direct photon production, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 074007 [hep-ph/9808467] [INSPIRE].
G. Miu and T. Sjöstrand, W production in an improved parton shower approach, Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 313 [hep-ph/9812455] [INSPIRE].
C. Balázs, J. Huston and I. Puljak, Higgs production: A Comparison of parton showers and resummation, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 014021 [hep-ph/0002032] [INSPIRE].
S. Amoroso et al., Snowmass 2021 whitepaper: Proton structure at the precision frontier, arXiv:2203.13923 [INSPIRE].
H1 and ZEUS collaborations, Impact of jet-production data on the next-to-next-to-leading-order determination of HERAPDF2.0 parton distributions, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 243 [arXiv:2112.01120] [INSPIRE].
M. Czakon, N.P. Hartland, A. Mitov, E.R. Nocera and J. Rojo, Pinning down the large-x gluon with NNLO top-quark pair differential distributions, JHEP 04 (2017) 044 [arXiv:1611.08609] [INSPIRE].
S. Bailey and L. Harland-Lang, Differential Top Quark Pair Production at the LHC: Challenges for PDF Fits, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 60 [arXiv:1909.10541] [INSPIRE].
M. Czakon, S. Dulat, T.-J. Hou, J. Huston, A. Mitov, A.S. Papanastasiou et al., An exploratory study of the impact of CMS double-differential top distributions on the gluon parton distribution function, J. Phys. G 48 (2020) 015003 [arXiv:1912.08801] [INSPIRE].
M. Kadir, A. Ablat, S. Dulat, T.-J. Hou and I. Sitiwaldi, The impact of ATLAS and CMS single differential top-quark pair measurements at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV on CTEQ-TEA PDFs, Chin. Phys. C 45 (2021) 023111 [arXiv:2003.13740] [INSPIRE].
M. Guzzi, A. Ablat, C.-P. Yuan, I. Sitiwaldi, K. Xie, S. Dulat et al., Impact of Top-quark pair production on CTEQ PDFs, in DIS2022:XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects, (2022).
CMS collaboration, Measurement of double-differential cross sections for top quark pair production in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV and impact on parton distribution functions, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 459 [arXiv:1703.01630] [INSPIRE].
M.H. Reno, W. Bai, M.V. Diwan, M.V. Garzelli, Y.S. Jeong and K. Kumar, Neutrinos from charm in the forward region, in DIS2022:XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects, (2022).
F. Kling and L.J. Nevay, Forward neutrino fluxes at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 113008 [arXiv:2105.08270] [INSPIRE].
K. Kovarik et al., nCTEQ15 - Global analysis of nuclear parton distributions with uncertainties in the CTEQ framework, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 085037 [arXiv:1509.00792] [INSPIRE].
S. Kretzer and M.H. Reno, Tau neutrino deep inelastic charged current interactions, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 113007 [hep-ph/0208187] [INSPIRE].
S. Kretzer and M.H. Reno, σDIS(νN), NLO perturbative QCD and O(1GeV) mass corrections, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 139 (2005) 134 [hep-ph/0410184] [INSPIRE].
Y.S. Jeong and M.H. Reno, Tau neutrino and antineutrino cross sections, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 033010 [arXiv:1007.1966] [INSPIRE].
M.H. Reno, Electromagnetic structure functions and neutrino nucleon scattering, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 033001 [hep-ph/0605295] [INSPIRE].
A. Capella, A. Kaidalov, C. Merino and J. Tran Thanh Van, Structure functions and low x physics, Phys. Lett. B 337 (1994) 358 [hep-ph/9405338] [INSPIRE].
A. Bodek and U.K. Yang, Higher twist, ξω scaling, and effective LO PDFs for lepton scattering in the few GeV region, J. Phys. G 29 (2003) 1899 [hep-ex/0210024] [INSPIRE].
A. Bodek and U.K. Yang, Modeling deep inelastic cross-sections in the few GeV region, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 112 (2002) 70 [hep-ex/0203009] [INSPIRE].
A. Bodek, I. Park and U.-k. Yang, Improved low Q2 model for neutrino and electron nucleon cross sections in few GeV region, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 139 (2005) 113 [hep-ph/0411202] [INSPIRE].
A. Bodek and U.-k. Yang, A Unified model for inelastic e - N and ν - N cross-sections at all Q2, AIP Conf. Proc. 792 (2005) 257 [hep-ph/0508007] [INSPIRE].
A. Bodek, U.K. Yang and Y. Xu, Inelastic Axial and Vector Structure Functions for Lepton-Nucleon Scattering 2021 Update, arXiv:2108.09240 [INSPIRE].
Y.S. Jeong and M.H. Reno, Interface of shallow- and deep-inelastic neutrino-nucleon scattering at the forward physics facility, in preparation (2022).
M.H. Reno, Evolution of the electroweak structure functions of nucleons, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. (2021).
Faser collaboration, Detecting and studying high-energy neutrinos with FASERν at the LHC, PoS ICHEP2020 (2021) 112 [INSPIRE].
F. Riehn, R. Engel, A. Fedynitch, T.K. Gaisser and T. Stanev, A new version of the event generator Sibyll, PoS ICRC2015 (2016) 558 [arXiv:1510.00568] [INSPIRE].
F. Riehn, H.P. Dembinski, R. Engel, A. Fedynitch, T.K. Gaisser and T. Stanev, The hadronic interaction model SIBYLL 2.3c and Feynman scaling, PoS ICRC2017 (2018) 301 [arXiv:1709.07227] [INSPIRE].
A. Fedynitch, F. Riehn, R. Engel, T.K. Gaisser and T. Stanev, Hadronic interaction model sibyll 2.3c and inclusive lepton fluxes, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 103018 [arXiv:1806.04140] [INSPIRE].
S. Roesler, R. Engel and J. Ranft, The Monte Carlo event generator DPMJET-III, in International Conference on Advanced Monte Carlo for Radiation Physics, Particle Transport Simulation and Applications (MC 2000), (2000), pp. 1033–1038, DOI [hep-ph/0012252] [INSPIRE].
A. Fedynitch, Cascade equations and hadronic interactions at very high energies, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Physics, KIT, Karlsruhe Germany (2015) [DOI].
T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J.R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
PROSA collaboration, Prompt neutrino fluxes in the atmosphere with PROSA parton distribution functions, JHEP 05 (2017) 004 [arXiv:1611.03815] [INSPIRE].
R. Abdul Khalek et al., Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, arXiv:2103.05419 [INSPIRE].
S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit and J. Mazzitelli, Bottom-quark production at hadron colliders: fully differential predictions in NNLO QCD, JHEP 03 (2021) 029 [arXiv:2010.11906] [INSPIRE].
W. Bai, M.V. Diwan, M.V. Garzelli, Y.S. Jeong, K. Kumar and M.H. Reno, Prompt electron and tau neutrinos and antineutrinos in the forward region at the LHC, JHEAp 34 (2022) 212 [arXiv:2203.07212] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2112.11605
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(ZIP 12 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Bai, W., Diwan, M., Garzelli, M.V. et al. Parton distribution function uncertainties in theoretical predictions for far-forward tau neutrinos at the Large Hadron Collider. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 148 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2022)148
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2022)148