Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Go to cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article
Jet energy spectrum and substructure in e+e− collisions at 91.2 GeV with ALEPH Archived Data
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Study of quark and gluon jet substructure in Z+jet and dijet events from pp collisions

31 January 2022

The CMS collaboration, A. Tumasyan, … W. Vetens

First measurement of large area jet transverse momentum spectra in heavy-ion collisions

31 May 2021

The CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan, … S. Trembath-Reichert

Measurements of the differential jet cross section as a function of the jet mass in dijet events from proton-proton collisions at s = 13 $$ \sqrt{s}=13 $$ TeV

20 November 2018

The CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan, … N. Woods

Measurements of the groomed and ungroomed jet angularities in pp collisions at s $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 5.02 TeV

10 May 2022

The ALICE collaboration, S. Acharya, … N. Zurlo

Medium modification of the shape of small-radius jets in central Pb-Pb collisions at s N N = 2.76 $$ \sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 $$ TeV

22 October 2018

The ALICE collaboration, S. Acharya, … J. Zmeskal

Leading jets and energy loss

08 July 2021

Duff Neill, Felix Ringer & Nobuo Sato

Measurement of jet-substructure observables in top quark, W boson and light jet production in proton-proton collisions at s $$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

06 August 2019

The ATLAS collaboration, M. Aaboud, … L. Zwalinski

The jet shape at NLL′

23 May 2019

Pedro Cal, Felix Ringer & Wouter J. Waalewijn

Jets separated by a large pseudorapidity gap at the Tevatron and at the LHC

25 August 2022

C. Baldenegro, P. González Durán, … J. Salomon

Download PDF
  • Regular Article - Experimental Physics
  • Open Access
  • Published: 03 June 2022

Jet energy spectrum and substructure in e+e− collisions at 91.2 GeV with ALEPH Archived Data

  • Yi Chen1,
  • Anthony Badea2,
  • Austin Baty3,
  • Paoti Chang4,
  • Yang-Ting Chien5,
  • Gian Michele Innocenti6,
  • Marcello Maggi7,
  • Christopher McGinn8,
  • Dennis V. Perepelitsa8,
  • Michael Peters1,
  • Tzu-An Sheng1,
  • Jesse Thaler1 &
  • …
  • Yen-Jie Lee1 

Journal of High Energy Physics volume 2022, Article number: 8 (2022) Cite this article

  • 130 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

The first measurements of energy spectra and substructure of anti-kT jets in hadronic Z0 decays in e+e− collisions are presented. The archived e+e− annihilation data at a center-of-mass energy of 91.2 GeV were collected with the ALEPH detector at LEP in 1994. In addition to inclusive jet and leading dijet energy spectra, various jet substructure observables are analyzed as a function of jet energy which includes groomed and ungroomed jet mass to jet energy ratios, groomed momentum sharing, and groomed jet radius. The results are compared with perturbative QCD calculations and predictions from the Sherpa, Herwig v7.1.5, Pythia6, Pythia8 and Pyquen event generators. The jet energy spectra agree with perturbative QCD calculations which include the treatment of logarithms of the jet radius and threshold logarithms. None of the event generators give a fully satisfactory description of the data.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  1. A. Abdesselam et al., Boosted Objects: A Probe of Beyond the Standard Model Physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1661 [arXiv:1012.5412] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. G.P. Salam, Towards Jetography, Eur. Phys. J. C 67 (2010) 637 [arXiv:0906.1833] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Altheimer et al., Jet Substructure at the Tevatron and LHC: New results, new tools, new benchmarks, J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 063001 [arXiv:1201.0008] [INSPIRE].

  4. A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult and B. Nachman, Jet Substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: A Review of Recent Advances in Theory and Machine Learning, Phys. Rept. 841 (2020) 1 [arXiv:1709.04464] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Kogler et al., Jet Substructure at the Large Hadron Collider: Experimental Review, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (2019) 045003 [arXiv:1803.06991] [INSPIRE].

  6. M. Connors, C. Nattrass, R. Reed and S. Salur, Jet measurements in heavy ion physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 025005 [arXiv:1705.01974] [INSPIRE].

  7. S. Cao and X.-N. Wang, Jet quenching and medium response in high-energy heavy-ion collisions: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84 (2021) 024301 [arXiv:2002.04028] [INSPIRE].

  8. L. Cunqueiro and A.M. Sickles, Studying the QGP with Jets at the LHC and RHIC, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 124 (2022) 103940 [arXiv:2110.14490] [INSPIRE].

  9. T. Sjöstrand et al., High-energy physics event generation with PYTHIA 6.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 135 (2001) 238 [hep-ph/0010017] [INSPIRE].

  10. T. Gleisberg et al., Event generation with SHERPA 1.1, JHEP 02 (2009) 007 [arXiv:0811.4622] [INSPIRE].

  11. D. Reichelt, P. Richardson and A. Siodmok, Improving the Simulation of Quark and Gluon Jets with HERWIG 7, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 876 [arXiv:1708.01491] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Neill, F. Ringer and N. Sato, Leading jets and energy loss, JHEP 07 (2021) 041 [arXiv:2103.16573] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. H.A. Andrews et al., Novel tools and observables for jet physics in heavy-ion collisions, J. Phys. G 47 (2020) 065102 [arXiv:1808.03689] [INSPIRE].

  14. R. Abdul Khalek et al., Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, arXiv:2103.05419 [INSPIRE].

  15. ALEPH collaboration, ALEPH: A detector for electron-positron annnihilations at LEP, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 294 (1990) 121 [Erratum ibid. 303 (1991) 393] [INSPIRE].

  16. ALEPH collaboration, Performance of the ALEPH detector at LEP, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 360 (1995) 481 [INSPIRE].

  17. A. Tripathee, W. Xue, A. Larkoski, S. Marzani and J. Thaler, Jet Substructure Studies with CMS Open Data, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 074003 [arXiv:1704.05842] [INSPIRE].

  18. A. Badea et al., Measurements of two-particle correlations in e+ e− collisions at 91 GeV with ALEPH archived data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 212002 [arXiv:1906.00489] [INSPIRE].

  19. ALEPH collaboration, Studies of QCD at e+e− centre-of-mass energies between 91-GeV and 209-GeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 35 (2004) 457 [INSPIRE].

  20. ALEPH collaboration, Studies of quantum chromodynamics with the ALEPH detector, Phys. Rept. 294 (1998) 1 [INSPIRE].

  21. E. Farhi, A QCD Test for Jets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 1587 [INSPIRE].

  22. T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].

  23. P. Skands, S. Carrazza and J. Rojo, Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3024 [arXiv:1404.5630] [INSPIRE].

  24. J. Bellm et al., HERWIG 7.0/HERWIG++ 3.0 release note, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 196 [arXiv:1512.01178] [INSPIRE].

  25. J.D. Bjorken, Energy Loss of Energetic Partons in Quark-Gluon Plasma: Possible Extinction of High p(t) Jets in Hadron-Hadron Collisions, FERMILAB-PUB-82-059-THY.

  26. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a Centrality-Dependent Dijet Asymmetry in Lead-Lead Collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{NN}} \) = 2.77 TeV with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 252303 [arXiv:1011.6182] [INSPIRE].

  27. CMS collaboration, Observation and studies of jet quenching in PbPb collisions at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 024906 [arXiv:1102.1957] [INSPIRE].

  28. I.P. Lokhtin and A.M. Snigirev, A model of jet quenching in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions and high-pT hadron spectra at RHIC, Eur. Phys. J. C 45 (2006) 211 [hep-ph/0506189] [INSPIRE].

  29. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet User Manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the jet radius and transverse momentum dependence of inclusive jet suppression in lead-lead collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{NN}} \) = 2.76 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 719 (2013) 220 [arXiv:1208.1967] [INSPIRE].

  32. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the nuclear modification factor for inclusive jets in Pb+Pb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_NN} \) = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 108 [arXiv:1805.05635] [INSPIRE].

  33. CMS collaboration, First measurement of large area jet transverse momentum spectra in heavy-ion collisions, JHEP 05 (2021) 284 [arXiv:2102.13080] [INSPIRE].

  34. CMS collaboration, Measurement of inclusive jet cross sections in pp and PbPb collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{NN}} \) = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2017) 015202 [arXiv:1609.05383] [INSPIRE].

  35. Y.L. Dokshitzer, G.D. Leder, S. Moretti and B.R. Webber, Better jet clustering algorithms, JHEP 08 (1997) 001 [hep-ph/9707323] [INSPIRE].

  36. Y. Chen et al., Analysis note: jet reconstruction, energy spectra, and substructure analyses with archived ALEPH data, arXiv:2108.04877 [INSPIRE].

  37. A.J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez and J. Thaler, Soft Drop, JHEP 05 (2014) 146 [arXiv:1402.2657] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani and G.P. Salam, Towards an understanding of jet substructure, JHEP 09 (2013) 029 [arXiv:1307.0007] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the Splitting Function in pp and Pb-Pb Collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{NN}} \) = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 142302 [arXiv:1708.09429] [INSPIRE].

  40. ALICE collaboration, Exploration of jet substructure using iterative declustering in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at LHC energies, Phys. Lett. B 802 (2020) 135227 [arXiv:1905.02512] [INSPIRE].

  41. STAR collaboration, Measurement of groomed jet substructure observables in p+p collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 200 GeV with STAR, Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135846 [arXiv:2003.02114] [INSPIRE].

  42. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of soft-drop jet observables in pp collisions with the ATLAS detector at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052007 [arXiv:1912.09837] [INSPIRE].

  43. CMS collaboration, Measurement of jet substructure observables in \( t\overline{t} \) events from proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 092014 [arXiv:1808.07340] [INSPIRE].

  44. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the groomed jet mass in PbPb and pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s_{NN}} \) = 5.02 TeV, JHEP 10 (2018) 161 [arXiv:1805.05145] [INSPIRE].

  45. M. Wobisch and T. Wengler, Hadronization corrections to jet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering, in Workshop on Monte Carlo Generators for HERA Physics (Plenary Starting Meeting), (1998), pp. 270–279 [hep-ph/9907280] [INSPIRE].

  46. A. Larkoski, S. Marzani, J. Thaler, A. Tripathee and W. Xue, Exposing the QCD Splitting Function with CMS Open Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 132003 [arXiv:1704.05066] [INSPIRE].

  47. G. D’Agostini, A multidimensional unfolding method based on Bayes’ theorem, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 362 (1995) 487 [INSPIRE].

  48. A. Hocker and V. Kartvelishvili, SVD approach to data unfolding, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 372 (1996) 469 [hep-ph/9509307] [INSPIRE].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Yi Chen, Michael Peters, Tzu-An Sheng, Jesse Thaler & Yen-Jie Lee

  2. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Anthony Badea

  3. Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA

    Austin Baty

  4. National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

    Paoti Chang

  5. Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Yang-Ting Chien

  6. CERN, Geneva, Switzerland

    Gian Michele Innocenti

  7. INFN Sezione di Bari, Bari, Italy

    Marcello Maggi

  8. University of Colorado, Boulder, USA

    Christopher McGinn & Dennis V. Perepelitsa

Authors
  1. Yi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony Badea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Austin Baty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paoti Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yang-Ting Chien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gian Michele Innocenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marcello Maggi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Christopher McGinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Dennis V. Perepelitsa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Michael Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tzu-An Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jesse Thaler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yen-Jie Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yi Chen or Yen-Jie Lee.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2111.09914

Rights and permissions

Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Badea, A., Baty, A. et al. Jet energy spectrum and substructure in e+e− collisions at 91.2 GeV with ALEPH Archived Data. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2022)008

Download citation

  • Received: 22 November 2021

  • Revised: 06 April 2022

  • Accepted: 06 May 2022

  • Published: 03 June 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2022)008

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Jet substructure
  • e +-e − Experiments
  • Jet Physics
  • Jets
  • QCD
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • How we use cookies
  • Your privacy choices/Manage cookies
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.