Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article
A binned likelihood for stochastic models
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Objective Bayesian inference with proper scoring rules

12 July 2018

F. Giummolè, V. Mameli, … L. Ventura

On the number of Monte Carlo runs in comparative probabilistic LCA

22 October 2019

Reinout Heijungs

History and nature of the Jeffreys–Lindley paradox

26 August 2022

Eric-Jan Wagenmakers & Alexander Ly

Simple measures of uncertainty for model selection

01 November 2020

Xiaohui Liu, Yuanyuan Li & Jiming Jiang

Objective Bayesian model choice for non-nested families: the case of the Poisson and the negative binomial

14 May 2020

Elías Moreno, Carmen Martínez & Francisco–José Vázquez–Polo

With Bayesian estimation one can get all that Bayes factors offer, and more

09 September 2022

Jorge N. Tendeiro & Henk A. L. Kiers

Generalized Empirical Bayes Modeling via Frequentist Goodness of Fit

02 July 2018

Subhadeep Mukhopadhyay & Douglas Fletcher

The Discrete Analogue of the Weibull G Family: Properties, Different Applications, Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Estimation Methods

05 April 2021

Mohamed Ibrahim, M. Masoom Ali & Haitham M. Yousof

Weighted-Average Least Squares (WALS): Confidence and Prediction Intervals

22 April 2022

Giuseppe De Luca, Jan R. Magnus & Franco Peracchi

Download PDF
  • Regular Article - Experimental Physics
  • Open Access
  • Published: 10 June 2019

A binned likelihood for stochastic models

  • C. A. Argüelles1,
  • A. Schneider2 &
  • T. Yuan2 

Journal of High Energy Physics volume 2019, Article number: 30 (2019) Cite this article

  • 455 Accesses

  • 20 Citations

  • 9 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

Metrics of model goodness-of-fit, model comparison, and model parameter estimation are the main categories of statistical problems in science. Bayesian and frequentist methods that address these questions often rely on a likelihood function, which is the key ingredient in order to assess the plausibility of model parameters given observed data. In some complex systems or experimental setups, predicting the outcome of a model cannot be done analytically, and Monte Carlo techniques are used. In this paper, we present a new analytic likelihood that takes into account Monte Carlo uncertainties, appropriate for use in the large and small sample size limits. Our formulation performs better than semi-analytic methods, prevents strong claims on biased statements, and provides improved coverage properties compared to available methods.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  1. J.S. Gainer, J. Lykken, K.T. Matchev, S. Mrenna and M. Park, Exploring theory space with Monte Carlo reweighting, JHEP 10 (2014) 078 [arXiv:1404.7129] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Lyons, Statistics for nuclear and particle physicists, Cambridge University Press, Camrbidge U.K. (1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. S.D. Poisson, Recherches sur la probabilité des jugements en matière criminelle et en matière civile precédées des règles générales du calcul des probabilités, Bachelier, France (1837).

  4. R.J. Barlow and C. Beeston, Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples, Comput. Phys. Commun. 77 (1993) 219 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Cranmer et al., HistFactory: a tool for creating statistical models for use with RooFit and RooStats, CERN-OPEN-2012-016 (2012).

  6. D. Chirkin, Likelihood description for comparing data with simulation of limited statistics, arXiv:1304.0735 [INSPIRE].

  7. T. Glüsenkamp, Probabilistic treatment of the uncertainty from the finite size of weighted Monte Carlo data, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 (2018) 218 [arXiv:1712.01293] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Argüelles, A. Schneider and T. Yuan, MCLLH, https://github.com/austinschneider/MCLLH, (2019).

  9. K. Pearson, On the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling, London, Edinburgh Dublin Phil. Mag. J. Sci. 50 (1900) 157.

  10. B.K. Cogswell et al., Neutrino oscillations: the ILL experiment revisited, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 053003 [arXiv:1802.07763] [INSPIRE].

  11. G. Cowan, Statistical data analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford U.K. (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.D. Cousins and V.L. Highland, Incorporating systematic uncertainties into an upper limit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 320 (1992) 331 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. T2K collaboration, Measurement of neutrino and antineutrino oscillations by the T2K experiment including a new additional sample of ν e interactions at the far detector, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 092006 [Erratum ibid. D 98 (2018) 019902] [arXiv:1707.01048] [INSPIRE].

  14. T2K collaboration, Search for CP-violation in neutrino and antineutrino oscillations by the T2K experiment with 2.2 × 1021 protons on target, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 171802 [arXiv:1807.07891] [INSPIRE].

  15. G. Bohm and G. Zech, Statistics of weighted Poisson events and its applications, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 748 (2014) 1 [arXiv:1309.1287] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Fink, A compendium of conjugate priors, (1997).

  17. J. Bernardo and A. Smith, Bayesian Theory, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley, U.S.A. (2009).

  18. D. Foreman-Mackey, D.W. Hogg, D. Lang and J. Goodman, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125 (2013) 306 [arXiv:1202.3665] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, U.S.A.

    C. A. Argüelles

  2. Department of Physics and Wisconsin IceCube Particle Astrophysics Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, U.S.A.

    A. Schneider & T. Yuan

Authors
  1. C. A. Argüelles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Yuan.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1901.04645

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Argüelles, C.A., Schneider, A. & Yuan, T. A binned likelihood for stochastic models. J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)030

Download citation

  • Received: 22 January 2019

  • Revised: 20 May 2019

  • Accepted: 27 May 2019

  • Published: 10 June 2019

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)030

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Event-by-event fluctuation
  • Neutrino Detectors and Telescopes (experiments)
  • Unfolding
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.