Abstract
We calculate, using our recently proposed semiclassical framework, the quantum state of the Hawking pairs that are produced during the evaporation of a black hole (BH). Our framework adheres to the standard rules of quantum mechanics and incorporates the quantum fluctuations of the collapsing shell spacetime in Hawking’s original calculation, while accounting for back-reaction effects. We argue that the negative-energy Hawking modes need to be regularly integrated out; and so these are effectively subsumed by the BH and, as a result, the number of coherent negative-energy modes N coh at any given time is parametrically smaller than the total number of the Hawking particles N total emitted during the lifetime of the BH. We find that N coh is determined by the width of the BH wavefunction and scales as the square root of the BH entropy. We also find that the coherent negative-energy modes are strongly entangled with their positive-energy partners. Previously, we have found that N coh is also the number of coherent outgoing particles and that information can be continually transferred to the outgoing radiation at a rate set by N coh . Our current results show that, while the BH is semiclassical, information can be released without jeopardizing the nearly maximal inside-out entanglement and imply that the state of matter near the horizon is approximately the vacuum. The BH firewall proposal, on the other hand, is that the state of matter near the horizon deviates substantially from the vacuum, starting at the Page time. We find that, under the usual assumptions for justifying the formation of a firewall, one does indeed form at the Page time. However, the possible loophole lies in the implicit assumption that the number of strongly entangled pairs can be of the same order of N total .
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S.W. Hawking, Black hole explosions, Nature 248 (1974) 30 [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199 [Erratum ibid. 46 (1976) 206-206] [INSPIRE].
S.W. Hawking, Breakdown of Predictability in Gravitational Collapse, Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 2460 [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Black hole information, hep-th/9305040 [INSPIRE].
S.B. Giddings, Comments on information loss and remnants, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 4078 [hep-th/9310101] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, What Exactly is the Information Paradox?, Lect. Notes Phys. 769 (2009) 3 [arXiv:0803.2030] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224001 [arXiv:0909.1038] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur, What the information paradox is not, arXiv:1108.0302 [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?, JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1207.3123] [INSPIRE].
N. Itzhaki, Is the black hole complementarity principle really necessary?, hep-th/9607028 [INSPIRE].
S.L. Braunstein, S. Pirandola and K. Życzkowski, Better Late than Never: Information Retrieval from Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 101301 [arXiv:0907.1190] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur and C.J. Plumberg, Correlations in Hawking radiation and the infall problem, JHEP 09 (2011) 093 [arXiv:1101.4899] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, Singularities, Firewalls and Complementarity, arXiv:1208.3445 [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, The Transfer of Entanglement: The Case for Firewalls, arXiv:1210.2098 [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, Complementarity Is Not Enough, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 124023 [arXiv:1207.5192] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura, J. Varela and S.J. Weinberg, Complementarity Endures: No Firewall for an Infalling Observer, JHEP 03 (2013) 059 [arXiv:1207.6626] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nomura, J. Varela and S.J. Weinberg, Black Holes, Information and Hilbert Space for Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 084050 [arXiv:1210.6348] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Mathur and D. Turton, Comments on black holes I: The possibility of complementarity, JHEP 01 (2014) 034 [arXiv:1208.2005] [INSPIRE].
A. Giveon and N. Itzhaki, String Theory Versus Black Hole Complementarity, JHEP 12 (2012) 094 [arXiv:1208.3930] [INSPIRE].
S.G. Avery, B.D. Chowdhury and A. Puhm, Unitarity and fuzzball complementarity: ’Alice fuzzes but may not even know it!’, JHEP 09 (2013) 012 [arXiv:1210.6996] [INSPIRE].
K. Larjo, D.A. Lowe and L. Thorlacius, Black holes without firewalls, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 104018 [arXiv:1211.4620] [INSPIRE].
E. Verlinde and H. Verlinde, Black Hole Entanglement and Quantum Error Correction, JHEP 10 (2013) 107 [arXiv:1211.6913] [INSPIRE].
E. Verlinde and H. Verlinde, Passing through the Firewall, arXiv:1306.0515 [INSPIRE].
E. Verlinde and H. Verlinde, Black Hole Information as Topological Qubits, arXiv:1306.0516 [INSPIRE].
K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, An Infalling Observer in AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2013) 212 [arXiv:1211.6767] [INSPIRE].
A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, An Apologia for Firewalls, JHEP 09 (2013) 018 [arXiv:1304.6483] [INSPIRE].
D.A. Lowe and L. Thorlacius, Pure states and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 044012 [arXiv:1305.7459] [INSPIRE].
J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 781 [arXiv:1306.0533] [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Excluding Black Hole Firewalls with Extreme Cosmic Censorship, arXiv:1306.0562 [INSPIRE].
M. Van Raamsdonk, Evaporating Firewalls, arXiv:1307.1796 [INSPIRE].
D. Marolf and J. Polchinski, Gauge/Gravity Duality and the Black Hole Interior, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 171301 [arXiv:1307.4706] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, Firewalls From Double Purity, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 084035 [arXiv:1308.2665] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, Frozen Vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 041102 [arXiv:1308.3697] [INSPIRE].
K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, State-Dependent Bulk-Boundary Maps and Black Hole Complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 086010 [arXiv:1310.6335] [INSPIRE].
E. Verlinde and H. Verlinde, Behind the Horizon in AdS/CFT, arXiv:1311.1137 [INSPIRE].
S.L. Braunstein and S. Pirandola, Evaporating black holes have leaky horizons or exotic atmospheres, arXiv:1311.1326 [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291 [gr-qc/9305007] [INSPIRE].
D.N. Page, Information in black hole radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306083] [INSPIRE].
L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, The Stretched horizon and black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3743 [hep-th/9306069] [INSPIRE].
C.R. Stephens, G. ’t Hooft and B.F. Whiting, Black hole evaporation without information loss, Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 621 [gr-qc/9310006] [INSPIRE].
R. Brustein, Origin of the blackhole information paradox, Fortsch. Phys. 62 (2014) 255 [arXiv:1209.2686] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 742 [arXiv:1112.3359] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Black Hole’s 1/N Hair, Phys. Lett. B 719 (2013) 419 [arXiv:1203.6575] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Black Holes as Critical Point of Quantum Phase Transition, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2752 [arXiv:1207.4059] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali and C. Gomez, Black Hole Macro-Quantumness, arXiv:1212.0765 [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, C. Gomez and D. Lüst, Black Hole Quantum Mechanics in the Presence of Species, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 768 [arXiv:1206.2365] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, D. Flassig, C. Gomez, A. Pritzel and N. Wintergerst, Scrambling in the Black Hole Portrait, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 124041 [arXiv:1307.3458] [INSPIRE].
R. Brustein and M. Hadad, Wave function of the quantum black hole, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 653 [arXiv:1202.5273] [INSPIRE].
R. Brustein and J. Kupferman, Black hole entropy divergence and the uncertainty principle, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 124014 [arXiv:1010.4157] [INSPIRE].
R. Brustein and A.J.M. Medved, Semiclassical black holes expose forbidden charges and censor divergent densities, JHEP 09 (2013) 108 [arXiv:1302.6086] [INSPIRE].
R. Brustein and A.J.M. Medved, Restoring predictability in semiclassical gravitational collapse, JHEP 09 (2013) 015 [arXiv:1305.3139] [INSPIRE].
R. Brustein and A.J.M. Medved, Phases of information release during black hole evaporation, JHEP 02 (2014) 116 [arXiv:1310.5861] [INSPIRE].
R. Brustein and A.J.M. Medved, How black holes burn, to appear.
P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025] [INSPIRE].
R. Brustein and A.J.M. Medved, Firewalls, smoke and mirrors, arXiv:1401.1401 [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1312.0880
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Brustein, R., Medved, A.J.M. Horizons of semiclassical black holes are cold. J. High Energ. Phys. 2014, 57 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2014)057
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2014)057