Skip to main content
Log in

Monopole-instantons in M2-brane theories

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study monopole-instantons in M2-brane theories, focussing on the ABJM class of Chern-Simons gauge theories coupled to matter. We calculate explicitly the 8-fermion term in the effective action induced by these monopole-instantons, and discuss their role in resolving a classical singularity in the moduli space. The results are compared with monopole-instantons in N = 8 3d SYM and D-brane theories, as well the dual supergravity description as a membrane scattering process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, Modeling multiple M2s, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 045020 [hep-th/0611108] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, Gauge symmetry and supersymmetry of multiple M2-branes, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 065008 [arXiv:0711.0955] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bagger and N. Lambert, Comments on multiple M2-branes, JHEP 02 (2008) 105 [arXiv:0712.3738] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Gustavsson, Selfdual strings and loop space Nahm equations, JHEP 04 (2008) 083 [arXiv:0802.3456] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Gustavsson, Algebraic structures on parallel M2-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 811 (2009) 66 [arXiv:0709.1260] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D.L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena, N = 6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals, JHEP 10 (2008) 091 [arXiv:0806.1218] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. M.R. Douglas, D.N. Kabat, P. Pouliot and S.H. Shenker, D-branes and short distances in string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 485 (1997) 85 [hep-th/9608024] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. N. Lambert and D. Tong, Membranes on an orbifold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 041602 [arXiv:0804.1114] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Berenstein and D. Trancanelli, Three-dimensional N = 6 SCFTs and their membrane dynamics, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 106009 [arXiv:0808.2503] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Dorey, V.V. Khoze and M. Mattis, Multi-instantons, three-dimensional gauge theory and the Gauss-Bonnet-Chern theorem, Nucl. Phys. B 502 (1997) 94 [hep-th/9704197] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Polchinski and P. Pouliot, Membrane scattering with M-momentum transfer, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 6601 [hep-th/9704029] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Paban, S. Sethi and M. Stern, Summing up instantons in three-dimensional Yang-Mills theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999) 343 [hep-th/9808119] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Hosomichi et al., A nonperturbative test of M2-brane theory, JHEP 11 (2008) 058 [arXiv:0809.1771] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Elitzur, G.W. Moore, A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg, Remarks on the canonical quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten theory, Nucl. Phys. B 326 (1989) 108 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. I. Affleck, J.A. Harvey, L. Palla and G.W. Semenoff, The Chern-Simons term versus the monopole, Nucl. Phys. B 328 (1989) 575 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. K.-M. Lee, Charge violation by instantons in Chern-Simons theories, Nucl. Phys. B 373 (1992) 735 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Lambert and C. Papageorgakis, Relating U(N) × U(N) to SU(N) × SU(N) Chern-Simons membrane theories, JHEP 04 (2010) 104 [arXiv:1001.4779] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Tekin, K. Saririan and Y. Hosotani, Complex monopoles in the Georgi-Glashow-Chern-Simons model, Nucl. Phys. B 539 (1999) 720 [hep-th/9808045] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Freed and J.A. Harvey, Instanton and the spectrum of Bloch electrons in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 41 11328.

  20. S. Mukhi, Unravelling the novel Higgs mechanism in (2 + 1)d Chern-Simons theories, JHEP 12 (2011) 083 [arXiv:1110.3048] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. N. Dorey, V.V. Khoze, M. Mattis, D. Tong and S. Vandoren, Instantons, three-dimensional gauge theory and the Atiyah-Hitchin manifold, Nucl. Phys. B 502 (1997) 59 [hep-th/9703228] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Fraser and D. Tong, Instantons, three-dimensional gauge theories and monopole moduli spaces, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 085001 [hep-th/9710098] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Van Raamsdonk, Comments on the Bagger-Lambert theory and multiple M2-branes, JHEP 05 (2008) 105 [arXiv:0803.3803] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, Tilings, Chern-Simons theories and M2 branes, JHEP 10 (2008) 111 [arXiv:0808.1244] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Benna, I. Klebanov, T. Klose and M. Smedback, Superconformal Chern-Simons theories and AdS 4 /CF T 3 correspondence, JHEP 09 (2008) 072 [arXiv:0806.1519] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. C.W. Bernard, Gauge zero modes, instanton determinants and QCD calculations, Phys. Rev. D 19 (1979) 3013 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jock McOrist.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1112.4073

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martinec, E., McOrist, J. Monopole-instantons in M2-brane theories. J. High Energ. Phys. 2013, 82 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2013)082

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2013)082

Keywords

Navigation