Abstract
The standard model can be extended to include weakly-interacting light particle (WILP): real or complex singlet scalar with a conserved U(1) charge, Majorana or Dirac neutral fermion, neutral or hidden-charged vector boson, etc. Imposing the Z2 symmetry, these particles can be lifted as the weakly-interacting massive particle (WIMP), the candidate of dark matter. Instead, imposing the shift symmetry on the scalar components gives rise to the axion-like particle, dark photon, etc. Utilizing these light degrees of freedom along with the standard model particles and imposing different symmetries, we construct the complete and independent sets of effective operators up to dimension eight with the Young tensor technique, consistent with counting from the Hilbert series.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
J. Beacham et al., Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report, J. Phys. G 47 (2020) 010501 [arXiv:1901.09966] [INSPIRE].
E. Prebys et al., Accelerators for Rare Processes and Physics Beyond Colliders: Report of the AF5 Topical Group to Snowmass 2021, arXiv:2209.06289 [INSPIRE].
J.L. Feng, FASER and the Search for Light and Weakly Interacting Particles, Astrophys. Space Sci. Proc. 56 (2019) 69 [INSPIRE].
A. Ringwald, Exploring the Role of Axions and Other WISPs in the Dark Universe, Phys. Dark Univ. 1 (2012) 116 [arXiv:1210.5081] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig et al., Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles, in the proceedings of the Snowmass 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi, Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A., 29 July–6 August 2013 [arXiv:1311.0029] [INSPIRE].
G. Lanfranchi, M. Pospelov and P. Schuster, The Search for Feebly Interacting Particles, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 71 (2021) 279 [arXiv:2011.02157] [INSPIRE].
J.R. Espinosa and M. Quiros, The electroweak phase transition with a singlet, Phys. Lett. B 305 (1993) 98 [hep-ph/9301285] [INSPIRE].
D. O’Connell, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and M.B. Wise, Minimal Extension of the Standard Model Scalar Sector, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 037701 [hep-ph/0611014] [INSPIRE].
V. Barger, P. Langacker and G. Shaughnessy, Collider Signatures of Singlet Extended Higgs Sectors, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 055013 [hep-ph/0611239] [INSPIRE].
A. Ahriche, What is the criterion for a strong first order electroweak phase transition in singlet models?, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 083522 [hep-ph/0701192] [INSPIRE].
S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition, JHEP 08 (2007) 010 [arXiv:0705.2425] [INSPIRE].
V. Barger et al., LHC Phenomenology of an Extended Standard Model with a Real Scalar Singlet, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 035005 [arXiv:0706.4311] [INSPIRE].
V. Barger et al., Complex Singlet Extension of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015018 [arXiv:0811.0393] [INSPIRE].
M. Gonderinger, Y. Li, H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Vacuum Stability, Perturbativity, and Scalar Singlet Dark Matter, JHEP 01 (2010) 053 [arXiv:0910.3167] [INSPIRE].
J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin and F. Riva, Strong Electroweak Phase Transitions in the Standard Model with a Singlet, Nucl. Phys. B 854 (2012) 592 [arXiv:1107.5441] [INSPIRE].
G.M. Pruna and T. Robens, Higgs singlet extension parameter space in the light of the LHC discovery, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 115012 [arXiv:1303.1150] [INSPIRE].
C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson and I.M. Lewis, Exploring resonant di-Higgs boson production in the Higgs singlet model, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 035015 [arXiv:1410.5488] [INSPIRE].
M. Gorbahn, J.M. No and V. Sanz, Benchmarks for Higgs Effective Theory: Extended Higgs Sectors, JHEP 10 (2015) 036 [arXiv:1502.07352] [INSPIRE].
S. Dawson and I.M. Lewis, NLO corrections to double Higgs boson production in the Higgs singlet model, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 094023 [arXiv:1508.05397] [INSPIRE].
R. Costa, M. Mühlleitner, M.O.P. Sampaio and R. Santos, Singlet Extensions of the Standard Model at LHC Run 2: Benchmarks and Comparison with the NMSSM, JHEP 06 (2016) 034 [arXiv:1512.05355] [INSPIRE].
T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, LHC Benchmark Scenarios for the Real Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 268 [arXiv:1601.07880] [INSPIRE].
B. Patt and F. Wilczek, Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors, hep-ph/0605188 [INSPIRE].
P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 109 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [INSPIRE].
T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95 [INSPIRE].
M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 [arXiv:1306.4669] [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [INSPIRE].
L.B. Okun, Limits of electrodynamics: paraphotons?, Sov. Phys. JETP 56 (1982) 502 [INSPIRE].
P. Galison and A. Manohar, Two Z’s or not two Z’s?, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 279 [INSPIRE].
B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys. Lett. B 166 (1986) 196 [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, O. Brandt, L. Lee and C. Ohm, ANUBIS: Proposal to search for long-lived neutral particles in CERN service shafts, arXiv:1909.13022 [INSPIRE].
M. Hirsch and Z.S. Wang, Heavy neutral leptons at ANUBIS, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 055034 [arXiv:2001.04750] [INSPIRE].
H.K. Dreiner, J.Y. Günther and Z.S. Wang, R-parity violation and light neutralinos at ANUBIS and MAPP, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 075013 [arXiv:2008.07539] [INSPIRE].
V.V. Gligorov, S. Knapen, M. Papucci and D.J. Robinson, Searching for Long-lived Particles: A Compact Detector for Exotics at LHCb, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 015023 [arXiv:1708.09395] [INSPIRE].
B. Dey, J. Lee, V. Coco and C.-S. Moon, Background studies for the CODEX-b experiment: measurements and simulation, arXiv:1912.03846 [INSPIRE].
G. Aielli et al., Expression of interest for the CODEX-b detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 1177 [arXiv:1911.00481] [INSPIRE].
G. Aielli et al., The Road Ahead for CODEX-b, arXiv:2203.07316 [INSPIRE].
J.L. Feng, I. Galon, F. Kling and S. Trojanowski, ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 035001 [arXiv:1708.09389] [INSPIRE].
FASER collaboration, Letter of Intent for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, arXiv:1811.10243 [INSPIRE].
FASER collaboration, Technical Proposal for FASER: ForwArd Search ExpeRiment at the LHC, arXiv:1812.09139 [INSPIRE].
FASER collaboration, The FASER Detector, arXiv:2207.11427 [INSPIRE].
FASER collaboration, The tracking detector of the FASER experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1034 (2022) 166825 [arXiv:2112.01116] [INSPIRE].
FASER collaboration, The trigger and data acquisition system of the FASER experiment, 2021 JINST 16 P12028 [arXiv:2110.15186] [INSPIRE].
J.P. Chou, D. Curtin and H.J. Lubatti, New Detectors to Explore the Lifetime Frontier, Phys. Lett. B 767 (2017) 29 [arXiv:1606.06298] [INSPIRE].
D. Curtin and M.E. Peskin, Analysis of Long Lived Particle Decays with the MATHUSLA Detector, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 015006 [arXiv:1705.06327] [INSPIRE].
J.A. Evans, Detecting Hidden Particles with MATHUSLA, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 055046 [arXiv:1708.08503] [INSPIRE].
D. Curtin et al., Long-Lived Particles at the Energy Frontier: The MATHUSLA Physics Case, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019) 116201 [arXiv:1806.07396] [INSPIRE].
D. Curtin, K.R. Dienes and B. Thomas, Dynamical Dark Matter, MATHUSLA, and the Lifetime Frontier, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 115005 [arXiv:1809.11021] [INSPIRE].
MATHUSLA collaboration, A Letter of Intent for MATHUSLA: A Dedicated Displaced Vertex Detector above ATLAS or CMS, arXiv:1811.00927 [INSPIRE].
MATHUSLA collaboration, Explore the lifetime frontier with MATHUSLA, 2020 JINST 15 C06026 [arXiv:1901.04040] [INSPIRE].
J. Alimena et al., Searching for long-lived particles beyond the Standard Model at the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G 47 (2020) 090501 [arXiv:1903.04497] [INSPIRE].
M. Alidra et al., The MATHUSLA test stand, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 985 (2021) 164661 [arXiv:2005.02018] [INSPIRE].
MATHUSLA collaboration, An Update to the Letter of Intent for MATHUSLA: Search for Long-Lived Particles at the HL-LHC, arXiv:2009.01693 [INSPIRE].
MATHUSLA collaboration, Recent Progress and Next Steps for the MATHUSLA LLP Detector, in the proceedings of the Snowmass 2021, Seattle, WA, U.S.A., 17–26 July 2022 [arXiv:2203.08126] [INSPIRE].
T. Bose et al., Report of the Topical Group on Physics Beyond the Standard Model at Energy Frontier for Snowmass 2021, arXiv:2209.13128 [INSPIRE].
NA62 collaboration, Search for Hidden Sector particles at NA62, PoS EPS-HEP2017 (2017) 301 [INSPIRE].
NA62 collaboration, The beam and detector of the NA62 experiment at CERN, 2017 JINST 12 P05025 [arXiv:1703.08501] [INSPIRE].
NA64 collaboration, Search for invisible decays of sub-GeV dark photons in missing-energy events at the CERN SPS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 011802 [arXiv:1610.02988] [INSPIRE].
S.N. Gninenko, D.V. Kirpichnikov, M.M. Kirsanov and N.V. Krasnikov, Combined search for light dark matter with electron and muon beams at NA64, Phys. Lett. B 796 (2019) 117 [arXiv:1903.07899] [INSPIRE].
D. Banerjee et al., Dark matter search in missing energy events with NA64, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 121801 [arXiv:1906.00176] [INSPIRE].
NA64 collaboration, Search for Axionlike and Scalar Particles with the NA64 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 081801 [arXiv:2005.02710] [INSPIRE].
S. Gninenko, Addendum to the NA64 Proposal: Search for the A′ → invisible and X → e+e− decays in 2021, CERN-SPSC-2018-004, CERN, Geneva (2018).
NA64 collaboration, Addendum to the Proposal P348: Search for dark sector particles weakly coupled to muon with NA64 μ, CERN-SPSC-2018-024 (2018) [INSPIRE].
SeaQuest collaboration, The SeaQuest Spectrometer at Fermilab, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 930 (2019) 49 [arXiv:1706.09990] [INSPIRE].
M.X. Liu, Prospects of direct search for dark photon and dark Higgs in SeaQuest/E1067 experiment at the Fermilab main injector, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32 (2017) 1730008 [INSPIRE].
A. Berlin, S. Gori, P. Schuster and N. Toro, Dark Sectors at the Fermilab SeaQuest Experiment, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 035011 [arXiv:1804.00661] [INSPIRE].
B. Batell, J.A. Evans, S. Gori and M. Rai, Dark Scalars and Heavy Neutral Leptons at DarkQuest, JHEP 05 (2021) 049 [arXiv:2008.08108] [INSPIRE].
N. Blinov, E. Kowalczyk and M. Wynne, Axion-like particle searches at DarkQuest, JHEP 02 (2022) 036 [arXiv:2112.09814] [INSPIRE].
A. Apyan et al., DarkQuest: A dark sector upgrade to SpinQuest at the 120 GeV Fermilab Main Injector, in the proceedings of the Snowmass 2021, Seattle, WA, U.S.A., 17–26 July 2022 [arXiv:2203.08322] [INSPIRE].
Y.-D. Tsai, P. deNiverville and M.X. Liu, Dark Photon and Muon g – 2 Inspired Inelastic Dark Matter Models at the High-Energy Intensity Frontier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 181801 [arXiv:1908.07525] [INSPIRE].
W. Bonivento et al., Proposal to Search for Heavy Neutral Leptons at the SPS, arXiv:1310.1762 [INSPIRE].
S. Alekhin et al., A facility to Search for Hidden Particles at the CERN SPS: the SHiP physics case, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) 124201 [arXiv:1504.04855] [INSPIRE].
SHiP collaboration, A facility to Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) at the CERN SPS, arXiv:1504.04956 [INSPIRE].
Y. Gershtein, CMS Hardware Track Trigger: New Opportunities for Long-Lived Particle Searches at the HL-LHC, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 035027 [arXiv:1705.04321] [INSPIRE].
J. Liu, Z. Liu and L.-T. Wang, Enhancing Long-Lived Particles Searches at the LHC with Precision Timing Information, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 131801 [arXiv:1805.05957] [INSPIRE].
L. Lee, C. Ohm, A. Soffer and T.-T. Yu, Collider Searches for Long-Lived Particles Beyond the Standard Model, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 106 (2019) 210 [Erratum ibid. 122 (2022) 103912] [arXiv:1810.12602] [INSPIRE].
J. Liu, Z. Liu, L.-T. Wang and X.-P. Wang, Seeking for sterile neutrinos with displaced leptons at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2019) 159 [arXiv:1904.01020] [INSPIRE].
J. Liu, Z. Liu, L.-T. Wang and X.-P. Wang, Enhancing Sensitivities to Long-lived Particles with High Granularity Calorimeters at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2020) 066 [arXiv:2005.10836] [INSPIRE].
Y. Gershtein, S. Knapen and D. Redigolo, Probing naturally light singlets with a displaced vertex trigger, Phys. Lett. B 823 (2021) 136758 [arXiv:2012.07864] [INSPIRE].
W.H. Chiu, Z. Liu, M. Low and L.-T. Wang, Jet timing, JHEP 01 (2022) 014 [arXiv:2109.01682] [INSPIRE].
O. Fischer et al., Unveiling hidden physics at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 665 [arXiv:2109.06065] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for heavy, long-lived, charged particles with large ionisation energy loss in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV using the ATLAS experiment and the full Run 2 dataset, JHEP 06 (2023) 158 [arXiv:2205.06013] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for heavy long-lived multi-charged particles in the full LHC Run 2 pp collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 847 (2023) 138316 [arXiv:2303.13613] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for heavy stable charged particles with 12.9 fb−1 of 2016 data, CMS-PAS-EXO-16-036, CERN, Geneva (2016).
CMS collaboration, Search for long-lived particles that decay into final states containing two muons, reconstructed using only the CMS muon chambers, CMS-PAS-EXO-14-012 (2015) [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for long-lived particles decaying to a pair of muons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 05 (2023) 228 [arXiv:2205.08582] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for long-lived particles in final states with displaced dimuon vertices in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 012001 [arXiv:1808.03057] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for decays of stopped exotic long-lived particles produced in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 05 (2018) 127 [arXiv:1801.00359] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for neutral long-lived particles in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV that decay into displaced hadronic jets in the ATLAS calorimeter, JHEP 06 (2022) 005 [arXiv:2203.01009] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for long-lived particles using displaced jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 012015 [arXiv:2012.01581] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, A search for the decays of stopped long-lived particles at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 07 (2021) 173 [arXiv:2104.03050] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for long-lived particles using delayed photons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 112003 [arXiv:1909.06166] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for long-lived particles using nonprompt jets and missing transverse momentum with proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134876 [arXiv:1906.06441] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for long-lived neutral particles in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV that decay into displaced hadronic jets in the ATLAS calorimeter, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 481 [arXiv:1902.03094] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for long-lived particles decaying into muon pairs in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV collected with a dedicated high-rate data stream, JHEP 04 (2022) 062 [arXiv:2112.13769] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search in diphoton and dielectron final states for displaced production of Higgs or Z bosons with the ATLAS detector in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 012012 [arXiv:2304.12885] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the charge asymmetry in top-quark pair production in association with a photon with the ATLAS experiment, arXiv:2212.10552 [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137848].
M.J. Strassler and K.M. Zurek, Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 651 (2007) 374 [hep-ph/0604261] [INSPIRE].
H. Song, H. Sun and J.-H. Yu, Effective field theories of axion, ALP and dark photon, JHEP 01 (2024) 161 [arXiv:2305.16770] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Analyzing the CP Nature of a New Scalar Particle via S → Zh Decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 181801 [arXiv:1610.00009] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, The “forgotten” decay S → Z + h as a CP analyzer, arXiv:1607.01016 [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles, JHEP 12 (2017) 044 [arXiv:1708.00443] [INSPIRE].
F. Kling et al., Light Scalars at FASER, JHEP 08 (2023) 001 [arXiv:2212.06186] [INSPIRE].
R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440 [INSPIRE].
R.D. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223 [INSPIRE].
F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279 [INSPIRE].
M. Beltran, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb and Z.C. Krusberg, Deducing the nature of dark matter from direct and indirect detection experiments in the absence of collider signatures of new physics, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 043509 [arXiv:0808.3384] [INSPIRE].
M. Cirelli, M. Kadastik, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Model-independent implications of the e±, anti-proton cosmic ray spectra on properties of Dark Matter, Nucl. Phys. B 813 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0809.2409] [INSPIRE].
W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and G. Zaharijas, Bound states of weakly interacting dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 055022 [arXiv:0901.2125] [INSPIRE].
Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen, C.S. Li and H. Zhang, Effective Dark Matter Model: Relic density, CDMS II, Fermi LAT and LHC, JHEP 08 (2011) 018 [arXiv:0912.4511] [INSPIRE].
M. Beltran et al., Maverick dark matter at colliders, JHEP 09 (2010) 037 [arXiv:1002.4137] [INSPIRE].
P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko, C. Kilic and R.K. Mishra, A Classification of Dark Matter Candidates with Primarily Spin-Dependent Interactions with Matter, arXiv:1003.1912 [INSPIRE].
A.L. Fitzpatrick, D. Hooper and K.M. Zurek, Implications of CoGeNT and DAMA for Light WIMP Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 115005 [arXiv:1003.0014] [INSPIRE].
J. Goodman et al., Constraints on Light Majorana dark Matter from Colliders, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 185 [arXiv:1005.1286] [INSPIRE].
J. Goodman et al., Constraints on Dark Matter from Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [INSPIRE].
J. Goodman et al., Gamma Ray Line Constraints on Effective Theories of Dark Matter, Nucl. Phys. B 844 (2011) 55 [arXiv:1009.0008] [INSPIRE].
J.-M. Zheng et al., Constraining the interaction strength between dark matter and visible matter: I. fermionic dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 854 (2012) 350 [arXiv:1012.2022] [INSPIRE].
A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M.P. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, LHC Bounds on Interactions of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095013 [arXiv:1108.1196] [INSPIRE].
Z.-H. Yu et al., Constraining the interaction strength between dark matter and visible matter: II. scalar, vector and spin-3/2 dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 860 (2012) 115 [arXiv:1112.6052] [INSPIRE].
J. March-Russell, J. Unwin and S.M. West, Closing in on Asymmetric Dark Matter I: Model independent limits for interactions with quarks, JHEP 08 (2012) 029 [arXiv:1203.4854] [INSPIRE].
L.M. Carpenter et al., Collider searches for dark matter in events with a Z boson and missing energy, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 074005 [arXiv:1212.3352] [INSPIRE].
E. Del Nobile and F. Sannino, Dark Matter Effective Theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 27 (2012) 1250065 [arXiv:1102.3116] [INSPIRE].
M. Duch, B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, Classification of effective operators for interactions between the Standard Model and dark matter, JHEP 05 (2015) 116 [arXiv:1412.0520] [INSPIRE].
J. Brod, A. Gootjes-Dreesbach, M. Tammaro and J. Zupan, Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Direct Detection up to Dimension Seven, JHEP 10 (2018) 065 [Erratum ibid. 07 (2023) 012] [arXiv:1710.10218] [INSPIRE].
J.C. Criado, A. Djouadi, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, A complete effective field theory for dark matter, JHEP 07 (2021) 081 [arXiv:2104.14443] [INSPIRE].
D. Barducci, E. Bertuzzo, G. Grilli di Cortona and G.M. Salla, Dark photon bounds in the dark EFT, JHEP 12 (2021) 081 [arXiv:2109.04852] [INSPIRE].
J. Aebischer, W. Altmannshofer, E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Dark matter effective field theory and an application to vector dark matter, JHEP 06 (2022) 086 [arXiv:2202.06968] [INSPIRE].
O. Lebedev, H.M. Lee and Y. Mambrini, Vector Higgs-portal dark matter and the invisible Higgs, Phys. Lett. B 707 (2012) 570 [arXiv:1111.4482] [INSPIRE].
M. Reece, Photon Masses in the Landscape and the Swampland, JHEP 07 (2019) 181 [arXiv:1808.09966] [INSPIRE].
G.D. Kribs, G. Lee and A. Martin, Effective field theory of Stückelberg vector bosons, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 055020 [arXiv:2204.01755] [INSPIRE].
C. Arina, J. Hajer and P. Klose, Portal Effective Theories. A framework for the model independent description of light hidden sector interactions, JHEP 09 (2021) 063 [arXiv:2105.06477] [INSPIRE].
F. del Aguila, S. Bar-Shalom, A. Soni and J. Wudka, Heavy Majorana Neutrinos in the Effective Lagrangian Description: Application to Hadron Colliders, Phys. Lett. B 670 (2009) 399 [arXiv:0806.0876] [INSPIRE].
A. Aparici, K. Kim, A. Santamaria and J. Wudka, Right-handed neutrino magnetic moments, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 013010 [arXiv:0904.3244] [INSPIRE].
Y. Liao and X.-D. Ma, Operators up to Dimension Seven in Standard Model Effective Field Theory Extended with Sterile Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 015012 [arXiv:1612.04527] [INSPIRE].
I. Bischer and W. Rodejohann, General neutrino interactions from an effective field theory perspective, Nucl. Phys. B 947 (2019) 114746 [arXiv:1905.08699] [INSPIRE].
I. Bischer, T. Plehn and W. Rodejohann, Dark Matter EFT, the Third — Neutrino WIMPs, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 039 [arXiv:2008.04718] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya and J. Wudka, Dimension-seven operators in the standard model with right handed neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 055022 [Erratum ibid. 95 (2017) 039904] [arXiv:1505.05264] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li et al., Operator bases in effective field theories with sterile neutrinos: d ≤ 9, JHEP 11 (2021) 003 [arXiv:2105.09329] [INSPIRE].
S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He, Counting BPS Operators in Gauge Theories: Quivers, Syzygies and Plethystics, JHEP 11 (2007) 050 [hep-th/0608050] [INSPIRE].
B. Feng, A. Hanany and Y.-H. He, Counting gauge invariants: The Plethystic program, JHEP 03 (2007) 090 [hep-th/0701063] [INSPIRE].
L. Lehman and A. Martin, Hilbert Series for Constructing Lagrangians: expanding the phenomenologist’s toolbox, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 105014 [arXiv:1503.07537] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, . . . : Higher dimension operators in the SM EFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 016 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2019) 019] [arXiv:1512.03433] [INSPIRE].
L. Lehman and A. Martin, Low-derivative operators of the Standard Model effective field theory via Hilbert series methods, JHEP 02 (2016) 081 [arXiv:1510.00372] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, Operator bases, S-matrices, and their partition functions, JHEP 10 (2017) 199 [arXiv:1706.08520] [INSPIRE].
L. Gráf et al., 2, 12, 117, 1959, 45171, 1170086, . . . : a Hilbert series for the QCD chiral Lagrangian, JHEP 01 (2021) 142 [arXiv:2009.01239] [INSPIRE].
L. Gráf et al., Hilbert series, the Higgs mechanism, and HEFT, JHEP 02 (2023) 064 [arXiv:2211.06275] [INSPIRE].
H. Sun, Y.-N. Wang and J.-H. Yu, Hilbert Series and Operator Counting on the Higgs Effective Field Theory, arXiv:2211.11598 [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li et al., Complete set of dimension-eight operators in the standard model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015026 [arXiv:2005.00008] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li et al., Complete set of dimension-nine operators in the standard model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015025 [arXiv:2007.07899] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li et al., Low energy effective field theory operator basis at d ≤ 9, JHEP 06 (2021) 138 [arXiv:2012.09188] [INSPIRE].
H. Sun, M.-L. Xiao and J.-H. Yu, Complete NLO operators in the Higgs effective field theory, JHEP 05 (2023) 043 [arXiv:2206.07722] [INSPIRE].
H. Sun, M.-L. Xiao and J.-H. Yu, Complete NNLO operator bases in Higgs effective field theory, JHEP 04 (2023) 086 [arXiv:2210.14939] [INSPIRE].
Y. Shadmi and Y. Weiss, Effective Field Theory Amplitudes the On-Shell Way: Scalar and Vector Couplings to Gluons, JHEP 02 (2019) 165 [arXiv:1809.09644] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning and T. Melia, Constructing effective field theories via their harmonics, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 016015 [arXiv:1902.06754] [INSPIRE].
T. Ma, J. Shu and M.-L. Xiao, Standard model effective field theory from on-shell amplitudes, Chin. Phys. C 47 (2023) 023105 [arXiv:1902.06752] [INSPIRE].
R. Aoude and C.S. Machado, The Rise of SMEFT On-shell Amplitudes, JHEP 12 (2019) 058 [arXiv:1905.11433] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Fonseca, Enumerating the operators of an effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035040 [arXiv:1907.12584] [INSPIRE].
G. Durieux, T. Kitahara, Y. Shadmi and Y. Weiss, The electroweak effective field theory from on-shell amplitudes, JHEP 01 (2020) 119 [arXiv:1909.10551] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, Bases of massless EFTs via momentum twistors, arXiv:1912.07865 [INSPIRE].
J.C. Criado and M. Pérez-Victoria, Field redefinitions in effective theories at higher orders, JHEP 03 (2019) 038 [arXiv:1811.09413] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning and T. Melia, Conformal-helicity duality & the Hilbert space of free CFTs, arXiv:1902.06747 [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li et al., Operators for generic effective field theory at any dimension: on-shell amplitude basis construction, JHEP 04 (2022) 140 [arXiv:2201.04639] [INSPIRE].
S.L. Adler, Consistency conditions on the strong interactions implied by a partially conserved axial vector current, Phys. Rev. 137 (1965) B1022 [INSPIRE].
S.L. Adler, Consistency conditions on the strong interactions implied by a partially conserved axial-vector current. II, Phys. Rev. 139 (1965) B1638 [INSPIRE].
I. Low, Adler’s zero and effective Lagrangians for nonlinearly realized symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 105017 [arXiv:1412.2145] [INSPIRE].
I. Low, Minimally symmetric Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 116005 [arXiv:1412.2146] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, K. Kampf, J. Novotny and J. Trnka, Effective Field Theories from Soft Limits of Scattering Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 221602 [arXiv:1412.4095] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung et al., On-Shell Recursion Relations for Effective Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 041601 [arXiv:1509.03309] [INSPIRE].
I. Low and Z. Yin, Soft Bootstrap and Effective Field Theories, JHEP 11 (2019) 078 [arXiv:1904.12859] [INSPIRE].
L. Dai, I. Low, T. Mehen and A. Mohapatra, Operator Counting and Soft Blocks in Chiral Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 116011 [arXiv:2009.01819] [INSPIRE].
I. Low, J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao and Y.-H. Zheng, Amplitude/operator basis in chiral perturbation theory, JHEP 01 (2023) 031 [arXiv:2209.00198] [INSPIRE].
V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett. B 161 (1985) 136 [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: A Singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 709 [hep-ph/0011335] [INSPIRE].
H. Davoudiasl, R. Kitano, T. Li and H. Murayama, The new minimal standard model, Phys. Lett. B 609 (2005) 117 [hep-ph/0405097] [INSPIRE].
M. Cirelli and A. Strumia, Minimal Dark Matter: Model and results, New J. Phys. 11 (2009) 105005 [arXiv:0903.3381] [INSPIRE].
A. Biswas and D. Majumdar, The Real Gauge Singlet Scalar Extension of Standard Model: A Possible Candidate of Cold Dark Matter, Pramana 80 (2013) 539 [arXiv:1102.3024] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott and C. Weniger, Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055025 [Erratum ibid. 92 (2015) 039906] [arXiv:1306.4710] [INSPIRE].
G. Arcadi et al., The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 203 [arXiv:1703.07364] [INSPIRE].
G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi and M. Raidal, Dark Matter through the Higgs portal, Phys. Rept. 842 (2020) 1 [arXiv:1903.03616] [INSPIRE].
S. Kanemura, S. Matsumoto, T. Nabeshima and N. Okada, Can WIMP Dark Matter overcome the Nightmare Scenario?, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 055026 [arXiv:1005.5651] [INSPIRE].
J. Alexander et al., Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report, arXiv:1608.08632 [INSPIRE].
M. Battaglieri et al., US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report, in the proceedings of the U.S. Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter, College Park, MD, U.S.A., 23–25 March 2017 [arXiv:1707.04591] [INSPIRE].
V. Barger, D.J.H. Chung, A.J. Long and L.-T. Wang, Strongly First Order Phase Transitions Near an Enhanced Discrete Symmetry Point, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1112.5460] [INSPIRE].
S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, C.L. Wainwright and P. Winslow, Singlet-catalyzed electroweak phase transitions and precision Higgs boson studies, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 035018 [arXiv:1407.5342] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Cline and K. Kainulainen, Electroweak baryogenesis and dark matter from a singlet Higgs, JCAP 01 (2013) 012 [arXiv:1210.4196] [INSPIRE].
M. Gonderinger, H. Lim and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Complex Scalar Singlet Dark Matter: Vacuum Stability and Phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 043511 [arXiv:1202.1316] [INSPIRE].
J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 3637 [hep-ph/0702143] [INSPIRE].
Y. Nambu, Quasiparticles and Gauge Invariance in the Theory of Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. 117 (1960) 648 [INSPIRE].
J. Goldstone, Field Theories with Superconductor Solutions, Nuovo Cim. 19 (1961) 154 [INSPIRE].
J. Goldstone, A. Salam and S. Weinberg, Broken Symmetries, Phys. Rev. 127 (1962) 965 [INSPIRE].
P. Svrcek and E. Witten, Axions In String Theory, JHEP 06 (2006) 051 [hep-th/0605206] [INSPIRE].
A. Arvanitaki et al., String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 123530 [arXiv:0905.4720] [INSPIRE].
M. Cicoli, M. Goodsell and A. Ringwald, The type IIB string axiverse and its low-energy phenomenology, JHEP 10 (2012) 146 [arXiv:1206.0819] [INSPIRE].
G.B. Gelmini and M. Roncadelli, Left-Handed Neutrino Mass Scale and Spontaneously Broken Lepton Number, Phys. Lett. B 99 (1981) 411 [INSPIRE].
S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2239 [INSPIRE].
C.G. Callan Jr., S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2247 [INSPIRE].
D.J.E. Marsh, Axion Cosmology, Phys. Rept. 643 (2016) 1 [arXiv:1510.07633] [INSPIRE].
J.N. Bahcall and R. Davis, Solar Neutrinos — a Scientific Puzzle, Science 191 (1976) 264 [INSPIRE].
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1562 [hep-ex/9807003] [INSPIRE].
SNO collaboration, Measurement of the rate of νe + d → p + p + e− interactions produced by 8B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 071301 [nucl-ex/0106015] [INSPIRE].
B. Pontecorvo, Mesonium and anti-mesonium, Sov. Phys. JETP 6 (1957) 429 [INSPIRE].
B. Pontecorvo, Neutrino Experiments and the Problem of Conservation of Leptonic Charge, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 53 (1967) 1717 [INSPIRE].
S. Dodelson and L.M. Widrow, Sterile-neutrinos as dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 17 [hep-ph/9303287] [INSPIRE].
X.-D. Shi and G.M. Fuller, A new dark matter candidate: Nonthermal sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 2832 [astro-ph/9810076] [INSPIRE].
A.D. Dolgov and S.H. Hansen, Massive sterile neutrinos as warm dark matter, Astropart. Phys. 16 (2002) 339 [hep-ph/0009083] [INSPIRE].
K. Abazajian, G.M. Fuller and W.H. Tucker, Direct detection of warm dark matter in the X-ray, Astrophys. J. 562 (2001) 593 [astro-ph/0106002] [INSPIRE].
K. Abazajian, G.M. Fuller and M. Patel, Sterile neutrino hot, warm, and cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 023501 [astro-ph/0101524] [INSPIRE].
T. Asaka, S. Blanchet and M. Shaposhnikov, The nuMSM, dark matter and neutrino masses, Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 151 [hep-ph/0503065] [INSPIRE].
T. Asaka and M. Shaposhnikov, The νMSM, dark matter and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Phys. Lett. B 620 (2005) 17 [hep-ph/0505013] [INSPIRE].
T. Asaka, M. Laine and M. Shaposhnikov, Lightest sterile neutrino abundance within the nuMSM, JHEP 01 (2007) 091 [Erratum ibid. 02 (2015) 028] [hep-ph/0612182] [INSPIRE].
M. Drewes et al., A White Paper on keV Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter, JCAP 01 (2017) 025 [arXiv:1602.04816] [INSPIRE].
A. Boyarsky et al., Sterile neutrino Dark Matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1807.07938] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, J. Juknevich and J. Shelton, Dark Matter Through the Neutrino Portal, arXiv:0908.1790 [INSPIRE].
M. Lindner, A. Merle and V. Niro, Enhancing Dark Matter Annihilation into Neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 123529 [arXiv:1005.3116] [INSPIRE].
Y. Bai and J. Berger, Fermion Portal Dark Matter, JHEP 11 (2013) 171 [arXiv:1308.0612] [INSPIRE].
V. Gonzalez Macias and J. Wudka, Effective theories for Dark Matter interactions and the neutrino portal paradigm, JHEP 07 (2015) 161 [arXiv:1506.03825] [INSPIRE].
L. Lopez-Honorez, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Higgs portal, fermionic dark matter, and a Standard Model like Higgs at 125 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 179 [arXiv:1203.2064] [INSPIRE].
Y.G. Kim and K.Y. Lee, The minimal model of fermionic dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 115012 [hep-ph/0611069] [INSPIRE].
Y.G. Kim, K.Y. Lee and S. Shin, Singlet fermionic dark matter, JHEP 05 (2008) 100 [arXiv:0803.2932] [INSPIRE].
M.A. Fedderke, J.-Y. Chen, E.W. Kolb and L.-T. Wang, The Fermionic Dark Matter Higgs Portal: an effective field theory approach, JHEP 08 (2014) 122 [arXiv:1404.2283] [INSPIRE].
K. Sigurdson et al., Dark-matter electric and magnetic dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 083501 [Erratum ibid. 73 (2006) 089903] [astro-ph/0406355] [INSPIRE].
T. Banks, J.-F. Fortin and S. Thomas, Direct Detection of Dark Matter Electromagnetic Dipole Moments, arXiv:1007.5515 [INSPIRE].
J.-F. Fortin and T.M.P. Tait, Collider Constraints on Dipole-Interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 063506 [arXiv:1103.3289] [INSPIRE].
N. Weiner and I. Yavin, How Dark Are Majorana WIMPs? Signals from MiDM and Rayleigh Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075021 [arXiv:1206.2910] [INSPIRE].
A.E. Nelson and J. Scholtz, Dark Light, Dark Matter and the Misalignment Mechanism, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 103501 [arXiv:1105.2812] [INSPIRE].
P. Arias et al., WISPy Cold Dark Matter, JCAP 06 (2012) 013 [arXiv:1201.5902] [INSPIRE].
P.W. Graham, J. Mardon and S. Rajendran, Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 103520 [arXiv:1504.02102] [INSPIRE].
S. Knapen, T. Lin and K.M. Zurek, Light Dark Matter: Models and Constraints, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 115021 [arXiv:1709.07882] [INSPIRE].
T. Hambye, M.H.G. Tytgat, J. Vandecasteele and L. Vanderheyden, Dark matter from dark photons: a taxonomy of dark matter production, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 095018 [arXiv:1908.09864] [INSPIRE].
M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli and G. Lanfranchi, The Dark Photon, arXiv:2005.01515 [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62519-1] [INSPIRE].
A. Proca, Sur la theorie ondulatoire des electrons positifs et negatifs, J. Phys. Radium 7 (1936) 347 [INSPIRE].
C. Arzt, M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Patterns of deviation from the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 433 (1995) 41 [hep-ph/9405214] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya and J. Wudka, Effective theories with dark matter applications, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30 (2021) 2130004 [arXiv:2104.01788] [INSPIRE].
P.W. Higgs, Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 508 [INSPIRE].
F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321 [INSPIRE].
E.C.G. Stueckelberg, Interaction energy in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces, Helv. Phys. Acta 11 (1938) 225 [INSPIRE].
H. Ruegg and M. Ruiz-Altaba, The Stueckelberg field, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19 (2004) 3265 [hep-th/0304245] [INSPIRE].
Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh and R. Harnik, The Twin Higgs: Natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 231802 [hep-ph/0506256] [INSPIRE].
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation of China under Grants No. 12022514, No. 11875003 and No. 12047503, and National Key Research and Development Program of China Grant No. 2020YFC2201501, No. 2021YFA0718304, and CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research YSBR-006, the Key Research Program of the CAS Grant No. XDPB15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2306.05999
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Song, H., Sun, H. & Yu, JH. Complete EFT operator bases for dark matter and weakly-interacting light particle. J. High Energ. Phys. 2024, 103 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2024)103
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2024)103