Abstract
Using “complexity=action” proposal we study complexity growth of certain gravitational theories containing higher derivative terms. These include critical gravity in diverse dimensions. One observes that the complexity growth for neutral black holes saturates the proposed bound when the results are written in terms of physical quantities of the model. We will also study effects of shock wave to the complexity growth where we find that the presence of massive spin-2 mode slows down the rate of growth.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2752.
J.M. Maldacena, The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, The holographic Weyl anomaly, JHEP 07 (1998) 023 [hep-th/9806087] [INSPIRE].
C.R. Graham and E. Witten, Conformal anomaly of submanifold observables in AdS/CFT correspondence, Nucl. Phys. B 546 (1999) 52 [hep-th/9901021] [INSPIRE].
M. Alishahiha, Holographic complexity, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 126009 [arXiv:1509.06614] [INSPIRE].
O. Ben-Ami and D. Carmi, On volumes of subregions in holography and complexity, JHEP 11 (2016) 129 [arXiv:1609.02514] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].
M. Alishahiha, unpublished.
L. Susskind, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 24 [arXiv:1403.5695] [INSPIRE].
D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 126007 [arXiv:1406.2678] [INSPIRE].
A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 191301 [arXiv:1509.07876] [INSPIRE].
A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Complexity, action and black holes, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 086006 [arXiv:1512.04993] [INSPIRE].
S. Lloyd, Ultimate physical limits to computation, Nature 406 (2000) 1047 [quant-ph/9908043].
K. Parattu, S. Chakraborty, B.R. Majhi and T. Padmanabhan, A Boundary Term for the Gravitational Action with Null Boundaries, Gen. Rel. Grav. 48 (2016) 94 [arXiv:1501.01053] [INSPIRE].
L. Lehner, R.C. Myers, E. Poisson and R.D. Sorkin, Gravitational action with null boundaries, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 084046 [arXiv:1609.00207] [INSPIRE].
S. Chapman, H. Marrochio and R.C. Myers, Complexity of formation in holography, JHEP 01 (2017) 062 [arXiv:1610.08063] [INSPIRE].
H. Lü and C.N. Pope, Critical Gravity in Four Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 181302 [arXiv:1101.1971] [INSPIRE].
M. Alishahiha and R. Fareghbal, D-Dimensional Log Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 084052 [arXiv:1101.5891] [INSPIRE].
R.-G. Cai, S.-M. Ruan, S.-J. Wang, R.-Q. Yang and R.-H. Peng, Action growth for AdS black holes, JHEP 09 (2016) 161 [arXiv:1606.08307] [INSPIRE].
E. Dyer and K. Hinterbichler, Boundary Terms, Variational Principles and Higher Derivative Modified Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 024028 [arXiv:0809.4033] [INSPIRE].
O. Hohm and E. Tonni, A boundary stress tensor for higher-derivative gravity in AdS and Lifshitz backgrounds, JHEP 04 (2010) 093 [arXiv:1001.3598] [INSPIRE].
E.A. Bergshoeff, O. Hohm and P.K. Townsend, Massive Gravity in Three Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 201301 [arXiv:0901.1766] [INSPIRE].
G. Anastasiou and R. Olea, From conformal to Einstein Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 086008 [arXiv:1608.07826] [INSPIRE].
D.A. Roberts, D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Localized shocks, JHEP 03 (2015) 051 [arXiv:1409.8180] [INSPIRE].
M. Alishahiha, A. Davody, A. Naseh and S.F. Taghavi, On butterfly effect in higher derivative gravities, JHEP 11 (2016) 032 [arXiv:1610.02890] [INSPIRE].
W.-J. Pan and Y.-C. Huang, Holographic complexity and action growth in massive gravities, arXiv:1612.03627 [INSPIRE].
R.-Q. Yang, Strong energy condition and the fastest computers, arXiv:1610.05090 [INSPIRE].
M. Miyaji, T. Numasawa, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Distance between Quantum States and Gauge-Gravity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 261602 [arXiv:1507.07555] [INSPIRE].
J. Couch, W. Fischler and P.H. Nguyen, Noether charge, black hole volume and complexity, JHEP 03 (2017) 119 [arXiv:1610.02038] [INSPIRE].
D. Carmi, R.C. Myers and P. Rath, Comments on Holographic Complexity, JHEP 03 (2017) 118 [arXiv:1612.00433] [INSPIRE].
X. Dong, Holographic entanglement entropy for general higher derivative gravity, JHEP 01 (2014) 044 [arXiv:1310.5713] [INSPIRE].
P. Bueno, V.S. Min, A.J. Speranza and M.R. Visser, Entanglement equilibrium for higher order gravity, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 046003 [arXiv:1612.04374] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1702.06796
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Alishahiha, M., Astaneh, A.F., Naseh, A. et al. On complexity for F (R) and critical gravity. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 9 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2017)009
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2017)009