Causal holographic information does not satisfy the linearized quantum focusing condition

Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

The Hubeny-Rangamani causal holographic information (CHI) defined by a region R of a holographic quantum field theory (QFT) is a modern version of the idea that the area of event horizons might be related to an entropy. Here the event horizon lives in a dual gravitational bulk theory with Newton’s constant Gbulk, and the relation involves a factor of 4Gbulk. The fact that CHI is bounded below by the von Neumann entropy S suggests that CHI is coarse-grained. Its properties could thus differ markedly from those of S. In particular, recent results imply that when d ≤ 4 holographic QFTs are perturbatively coupled to d-dimensional gravity, the combined system satisfies the so-called quantum focusing condition (QFC) at leading order in the new gravitational coupling G d when the QFT entropy is taken to be that of von Neumann. However, by studying states dual to spherical bulk (anti-de Sitter) Schwarschild black holes in the conformal frame for which the boundary is a (2 + 1)-dimensional de Sitter space, we find the QFC defined by CHI is violated even when perturbing about a Killing horizon and using a single null congruence. Since it is known that a generalized second law (GSL) holds in this context, our work demonstrates that the QFC is not required in order for an entropy, or an entropy-like quantity, to satisfy such a GSL.

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence Black Holes 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    V.E. Hubeny and M. Rangamani, Causal holographic information, JHEP 06 (2012) 114 [arXiv:1204.1698] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A.C. Wall, Maximin surfaces and the strong subadditivity of the covariant holographic entanglement entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [arXiv:1211.3494] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    W.R. Kelly and A.C. Wall, Coarse-grained entropy and causal holographic information in AdS/CFT, JHEP 03 (2014) 118 [arXiv:1309.3610] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, No simple dual to the causal holographic information?, JHEP 04 (2017) 134 [arXiv:1702.01748] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    B. Freivogel and B. Mosk, Properties of causal holographic information, JHEP 09 (2013) 100 [arXiv:1304.7229] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    W. Bunting, Z. Fu and D. Marolf, A coarse-grained generalized second law for holographic conformal field theories, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 055008 [arXiv:1509.00074] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064044 [arXiv:1506.02669] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Proof of the quantum null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 024017 [arXiv:1509.02542] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Balakrishnan, T. Faulkner, Z.U. Khandker and H. Wang, A general proof of the quantum null energy condition, arXiv:1706.09432 [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    Z. Fu, J. Koeller and D. Marolf, The quantum null energy condition in curved space, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 225012 [Erratum ibid. 35 (2018) 049501] [arXiv:1706.01572] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    C. Akers, V. Chandrasekaran, S. Leichenauer, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi Moghaddam, The quantum null energy condition, entanglement wedge nesting and quantum focusing, arXiv:1706.04183 [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    Z. Fu and D. Marolf, Does horizon entropy satisfy a quantum null energy conjecture?, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 245011 [arXiv:1606.04713] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R.C. Myers, Stress tensors and Casimir energies in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 046002 [hep-th/9903203] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    B. Grado-White and D. Marolf, Marginally trapped surfaces and AdS/CFT, JHEP 02 (2018) 049 [arXiv:1708.00957] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Decoding the apparent horizon: a coarse-grained holographic entropy, arXiv:1706.02038 [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations