Skip to main content

First measurement of the \( {\Lambda}_c^{+} \) → pη′ decay

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We present the first measurement of the branching fraction of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed (SCS) decay \( {\Lambda}_c^{+} \) → pη′ with η→ ηπ+π, using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 981 fb1, collected by the Belle detector at the KEKB e+e asymmetric-energy collider. A significant \( {\Lambda}_c^{+} \) → pη′ signal is observed for the first time with a signal significance of 5.4σ. The relative branching fraction with respect to the normalization mode \( {\Lambda}_c^{+} \) → pKπ+ is measured to be

$$ \frac{\mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to p\eta^{\prime}\right)}{\mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to {pK}^{-}{\pi}^{+}\right)}=\left(7.54\pm 1.32\pm 0.73\right)\times {10}^{-3}, $$

where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. Using the world-average value of \( \mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to {pK}^{-}{\pi}^{+}\right) \) = (6.28 ± 0.32) × 102, we obtain

$$ \mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to p\eta^{\prime}\right)=\left(4.73\pm 0.82\pm 0.46\pm 0.24\right)\times {10}^{-4}, $$

where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and from \( \mathcal{B}\left({\Lambda}_c^{+}\to {pK}^{-}{\pi}^{+}\right) \), respectively.

References

  1. B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, G. Ingelman and T. Sjöstrand, Parton fragmentation and string dynamics, Phys. Rept. 97 (1983) 31 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Andersson, G. Gustafson and T. Sjöstrand, Baryon production in jet fragmentation and γ-decay, Phys. Scr. 32 (1985) 574.

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Uppal, R.C. Verma and M.P. Khanna, Constituent quark model analysis of weak mesonic decays of charm baryons, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 3417 [INSPIRE].

  4. P. Zenczykowski, Quark and pole models of nonleptonic decays of charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 402 [hep-ph/9309265] [INSPIRE].

  5. K.K. Sharma and R.C. Verma, SU(3)flavor analysis of two-body weak decays of charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 7067 [hep-ph/9704391] [INSPIRE].

  6. M.A. Ivanov, J.G. Korner, V.E. Lyubovitskij and A.G. Rusetsky, Exclusive nonleptonic decays of bottom and charm baryons in a relativistic three quark model: evaluation of nonfactorizing diagrams, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 5632 [hep-ph/9709372] [INSPIRE].

  7. Y. Kohara, Two-body nonleptonic decays of charmed baryons, Nuovo Cim. A 111 (1998) 67 [INSPIRE].

  8. M.J. Savage and R.P. Springer, SU(3) predictions for charmed baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 1527 [INSPIRE].

  9. M.J. Savage, SU(3) violations in the nonleptonic decay of charmed hadrons, Phys. Lett. B 257 (1991) 414 [INSPIRE].

  10. H.-Y. Cheng, X.-W. Kang and F. Xu, Singly Cabibbo-suppressed hadronic decays of \( {\Lambda}_c^{+} \) , Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 074028 [arXiv:1801.08625] [INSPIRE].

  11. J. Zou, F. Xu, G. Meng and H.-Y. Cheng, Two-body hadronic weak decays of antitriplet charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 014011 [arXiv:1910.13626] [INSPIRE].

  12. W. Wang, F.-S. Yu and Z.-X. Zhao, Weak decays of doubly heavy baryons: the 1/2 1/2 case, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 781 [arXiv:1707.02834] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C.Q. Geng, Y.K. Hsiao, C.-W. Liu and T.-H. Tsai, Antitriplet charmed baryon decays with SU(3) flavor symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 073006 [arXiv:1801.03276] [INSPIRE].

  14. S. Kurokawa and E. Kikutani, Overview of the KEKB accelerators, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 499 (2003) 1 [INSPIRE].

  15. T. Abe et al., Achievements of KEKB, PTEP 2013 (2013) 03A001 [INSPIRE].

  16. Belle collaboration, Physics achievements from the Belle experiment, PTEP 2012 (2012) 04D001 [arXiv:1212.5342] [INSPIRE].

  17. Belle collaboration, The Belle detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 479 (2002) 117 [INSPIRE].

  18. D.J. Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462 (2001) 152 [INSPIRE].

  19. R. Brun, F. Bruyant, M. Maire, A.C. McPherson and P. Zanarini, GEANT 3.21: user’s guide, CERN-DD-EE-84-01, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (1987).

  20. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852 [arXiv:0710.3820] [INSPIRE].

  21. Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].

  22. E. Barberio and Z. Was, PHOTOS: a universal Monte Carlo for QED radiative corrections. Version 2.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 79 (1994) 291 [INSPIRE].

  23. X. Zhou, S. Du, G. Li and C. Shen, TopoAna: a generic tool for the event type analysis of inclusive Monte-Carlo samples in high energy physics experiments, Comput. Phys. Commun. 258 (2021) 107540 [arXiv:2001.04016] [INSPIRE].

  24. G. Punzi, Sensitivity of searches for new signals and its optimization, eConf C 030908 (2003) MODT002 [physics/0308063] [INSPIRE].

  25. E. Nakano, Belle PID, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 494 (2002) 402 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Hanagaki, H. Kakuno, H. Ikeda, T. Iijima and T. Tsukamoto, Electron identification in Belle, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 485 (2002) 490 [hep-ex/0108044] [INSPIRE].

  27. M. Oreglia, A study of the reactions ψ→ γγψ, Ph.D. thesis, SLAC-R-236, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, U.S.A. (1980) [INSPIRE].

  28. S.S. Wilks, The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses, Annals Math. Statist. 9 (1938) 60 [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. BESIII collaboration, Measurement of the matrix element for the decay η→ ηπ+π, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 012003 [arXiv:1012.1117] [INSPIRE].

  30. R. Dalitz, CXII. On the analysis of τ-meson data and the nature of the τ-meson, Phil. Mag. 44 (1953) 1068.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. P. Shen.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2112.14276

Rights and permissions

Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

The BELLE collaboration., Li, S.X., Cui, J.X. et al. First measurement of the \( {\Lambda}_c^{+} \) → pη′ decay. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 90 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)090

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)090

Keywords

  • Branching fraction
  • e +-e Experiments
  • Charm Physics
  • Particle and Resonance Production