Abstract
An angular analysis of the B 0 → K *0(→ K + π −)μ + μ − decay is presented. The dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 3.0 fb−1 of pp collision data collected at the LHCb experiment. The complete angular information from the decay is used to determine CP-averaged observables and CP asymmetries, taking account of possible contamination from decays with the K + π − system in an S-wave configuration. The angular observables and their correlations are reported in bins of q 2, the invariant mass squared of the dimuon system. The observables are determined both from an unbinned maximum likelihood fit and by using the principal moments of the angular distribution. In addition, by fitting for q 2-dependent decay amplitudes in the region 1.1 < q 2 < 6.0 GeV2/c 4, the zero-crossing points of several angular observables are computed. A global fit is performed to the complete set of CP-averaged observables obtained from the maximum likelihood fit. This fit indicates differences with predictions based on the Standard Model at the level of 3.4 standard deviations. These differences could be explained by contributions from physics beyond the Standard Model, or by an unexpectedly large hadronic effect that is not accounted for in the Standard Model predictions.
References
LHCb collaboration, Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ −, JHEP 08 (2013) 131 [arXiv:1304.6325] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Measurements of branching fractions, rate asymmetries and angular distributions in the rare decays B → Kℓ + ℓ − and B → K * ℓ + ℓ −, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 092001 [hep-ex/0604007] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, J.P. Lees et al., Measurement of angular asymmetries in the decays B → K * ℓ + ℓ −, arXiv:1508.07960 [INSPIRE].
Belle collaboration, J.T. Wei et al., Measurement of the differential branching fraction and forward-backword asymmetry for B → K (*) ℓ + ℓ −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 171801 [arXiv:0904.0770] [INSPIRE].
CDF collaboration, T. Aaltonen et al., Measurements of the angular distributions in the decays B → K (*) μ + μ − at CDF, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 081807 [arXiv:1108.0695] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Angular analysis and branching fraction measurement of the decay B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ −, Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 77 [arXiv:1308.3409] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Angular analysis of the decay B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ − from pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 424 [arXiv:1507.08126] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of form-factor-independent observables in the decay B 0 → K *0 μ + μ −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 191801 [arXiv:1308.1707] [INSPIRE].
S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias and J. Virto, Understanding the B → K * μ + μ − anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 074002 [arXiv:1307.5683] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer and D.M. Straub, New physics in B → K * μμ?, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2646 [arXiv:1308.1501] [INSPIRE].
F. Beaujean, C. Bobeth and D. van Dyk, Comprehensive bayesian analysis of rare (semi)leptonic and radiative B decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2897 [Erratum ibid. C 74 (2014) 3179] [arXiv:1310.2478] [INSPIRE].
T. Hurth and F. Mahmoudi, On the LHCb anomaly in B → K * ℓ + ℓ −, JHEP 04 (2014) 097 [arXiv:1312.5267] [INSPIRE].
S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, On B → Vℓℓ at small dilepton invariant mass, power corrections and new physics, JHEP 05 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1212.2263] [INSPIRE].
S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias and J. Virto, On the impact of power corrections in the prediction of B → K * μ + μ − observables, JHEP 12 (2014) 125 [arXiv:1407.8526] [INSPIRE].
J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Resonances gone topsy turvy — The charm of QCD or new physics in b → sℓ + ℓ − ?, arXiv:1406.0566 [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, Quark flavor transitions in L μ − L τ models, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 095033 [arXiv:1403.1269] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio and J. Heeck, Explaining h → μ ± τ ∓ , B → K * μ + μ − and B → Kμ + μ − /B → Ke + e − in a two-Higgs-doublet model with gauged L μ −L τ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 151801 [arXiv:1501.00993] [INSPIRE].
R. Gauld, F. Goertz and U. Haisch, An explicit Z′-boson explanation of the B → K * μ + μ − anomaly, JHEP 01 (2014) 069 [arXiv:1310.1082] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer and D.M. Straub, New physics in b → s transitions after LHC run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 382 [arXiv:1411.3161] [INSPIRE].
F. Mahmoudi, S. Neshatpour and J. Virto, B → K * μ + μ − optimised observables in the MSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2927 [arXiv:1401.2145] [INSPIRE].
A. Datta, M. Duraisamy and D. Ghosh, Explaining the B → K * μ + μ − data with scalar interactions, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 071501 [arXiv:1310.1937] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, P. Ball, A. Bharucha, A.J. Buras, D.M. Straub and M. Wick, Symmetries and asymmetries of B → K * μ + μ − decays in the Standard Model and beyond, JHEP 01 (2009) 019 [arXiv:0811.1214] [INSPIRE].
F. Krüger and J. Matias, Probing new physics via the transverse amplitudes of B 0 → K *0(→ K − π +)ℓ + ℓ − at large recoil, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 094009 [hep-ph/0502060] [INSPIRE].
S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Ramon and J. Virto, Implications from clean observables for the binned analysis of B → K * μ + μ − at large recoil, JHEP 01 (2013) 048 [arXiv:1207.2753] [INSPIRE].
F. Beaujean, M. Chrzaszcz, N. Serra and D. van Dyk, Extracting angular observables without a likelihood and applications to rare decays, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 114012 [arXiv:1503.04100] [INSPIRE].
A. Ali, P. Ball, L.T. Handoko and G. Hiller, A comparative study of the decays B → (K, K *)ℓ + ℓ − in standard model and supersymmetric theories, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 074024 [hep-ph/9910221] [INSPIRE].
G. Kumar and N. Mahajan, B → K * l + l − : zeroes of angular observables as test of standard model, arXiv:1412.2955 [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, The LHCb detector at the LHC, 2008 JINST 3 S08005 [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, LHCb detector performance, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 1530022 [arXiv:1412.6352] [INSPIRE].
R. Aaij et al., The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011, 2013 JINST 8 P04022 [arXiv:1211.3055] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852 [arXiv:0710.3820] [INSPIRE].
I. Belyaev et al., Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032047 [INSPIRE].
D.J. Lange, The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 462 (2001) 152 [INSPIRE].
P. Golonka and Z. Was, PHOTOS Monte Carlo: a precision tool for QED corrections in Z and W decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 45 (2006) 97 [hep-ph/0506026] [INSPIRE].
Geant4 collaboration, J. Allison et al., GEANT4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (2006) 270.
GEANT4 collaboration, S. Agostinelli et al., GEANT4: a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250 [INSPIRE].
M. Clemencic et al., The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: design, evolution and experience, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 331 (2011) 032023 [INSPIRE].
L. Breiman, J.H. Friedman, R.A. Olshen and C.J. Stone, Classification and regression trees, Wadsworth international group, Belmont, California U.S.A. (1984).
R.E. Schapire and Y. Freund, A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting, J.. Comp. Syst. Sc. 55 (1997) 119.
LHCb collaboration, Search for the rare decays B 0 s → μ + μ − and B 0 → μ + μ −, Phys. Lett. B 699 (2011) 330 [arXiv:1103.2465] [INSPIRE].
A. Blum, A. Kalai and J. Langford, Beating the hold-out: bounds for k-fold and progressive cross-validation, in the proceedings of the Twelfth annual conference on Computational Learning Theory (COLT ’99), July 6–9, Santa Cruz, U.S.A. (1999).
BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Measurement of decay amplitudes of B → J/ψK * , ψ(2S)K * and χ c1 K ∗ with an angular analysis, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 031102 [arXiv:0704.0522] [INSPIRE].
Belle collaboration, K. Chilikin et al., Observation of a new charged charmoniumlike state in \( {\overline{B}}^0\to J/\psi {K}^{-}{\pi}^{+} \) decays, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 112009 [arXiv:1408.6457] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the polarization amplitudes in B 0 → J/ψK *(892)0 decays, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 052002 [arXiv:1307.2782] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the \( {B}_s^0\to J/\psi {\overline{K}}^{\ast 0} \) branching fraction and angular amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 071102 [arXiv:1208.0738] [INSPIRE].
D. Aston et al., A study of K − π + scattering in the reaction K − p → K − π + n at 11 GeV/c, Nucl. Phys. B 296 (1988) 493.
G.J. Feldman and R.D. Cousins, A Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 3873 [physics/9711021] [INSPIRE].
B. Sen, M. Walker and M. Woodroofe, On the unified method with nuisance parameters, Stat. Sinica 19 (2009) 301.
J. Gratrex, M. Hopfer and R. Zwicky, Generalised helicity formalism, higher moments and the \( B\to {K}_{J_K}\left(\to K\pi \right){\overline{\ell}}_1{\ell}_2 \) angular distributions, arXiv:1506.03970 [INSPIRE].
B. Efron, Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife, Ann. Statist. 7 (1979) 1.
F. Beaujean, C. Bobeth and S. Jahn, Constraints on tensor and scalar couplings from \( B\to K\overline{\mu}\mu \) and \( {B}_s\to \overline{\mu}\mu \), Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 456 [arXiv:1508.01526] [INSPIRE].
U. Egede, T. Hurth, J. Matias, M. Ramon and W. Reece, New physics reach of the decay mode \( \overline{B}\to {\overline{K}}^{\ast 0}{\ell}^{+}{\ell}^{-} \), JHEP 10 (2010) 056 [arXiv:1005.0571] [INSPIRE].
U. Egede, M. Patel and K.A. Petridis, Method for an unbinned measurement of the q 2 dependent decay amplitudes of \( {\overline{B}}^0\to {K}^{\ast 0}{\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-} \) decays, JHEP 06 (2015) 084 [arXiv:1504.00574] [INSPIRE].
C.-D. Lu and W. Wang, Analysis of B → K * J (→Kπ)μ + μ − in the higher kaon resonance region, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 034014 [arXiv:1111.1513] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the \( {\overline{B}}^0-{B}^0 \) and \( {\overline{B}}_s^0-{B}_s^0 \) production asymmetries in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 739 (2014) 218 [arXiv:1408.0275] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the semileptonic CP asymmetry in \( {B}^0-{\overline{B}}^0 \) mixing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 041601 [arXiv:1409.8586] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of CP asymmetry in D 0 → K − K + and D 0 → π − π + decays, JHEP 07 (2014) 041 [arXiv:1405.2797] [INSPIRE].
C. Bobeth, G. Hiller and D. van Dyk, The benefits of \( B\to {\overline{K}}^{\ast }{l}^{+}{l}^{-} \) decays at low recoil, JHEP 07 (2010) 098 [arXiv:1006.5013] [INSPIRE].
S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, Reassessing the discovery potential of the B → K * ℓ + ℓ − decays in the large-recoil region: SM challenges and BSM opportunities, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 014028 [arXiv:1412.3183] [INSPIRE].
D. Das and R. Sinha, New physics effects and hadronic form factor uncertainties in B → K * ℓ + ℓ −, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 056006 [arXiv:1205.1438] [INSPIRE].
R.R. Horgan, Z. Liu, S. Meinel and M. Wingate, Calculation of B 0 → K *0 μ + μ − and B 0 s → ϕμ + μ − observables using form factors from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 212003 [arXiv:1310.3887] [INSPIRE].
C. Hambrock, G. Hiller, S. Schacht and R. Zwicky, B → K * form factors from flavor data to QCD and back, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 074014 [arXiv:1308.4379] [INSPIRE].
T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi and S. Neshatpour, Global fits to b → sℓℓ data and signs for lepton non-universality, JHEP 12 (2014) 053 [arXiv:1410.4545] [INSPIRE].
P. Ball and R. Zwicky, B d,s → ρ, ω, K * , ϕ decay form-factors from light-cone sum rules revisited, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 014029 [hep-ph/0412079] [INSPIRE].
A. Bharucha, D.M. Straub and R. Zwicky, B → Vℓ + ℓ − in the standard model from light-cone sum rules, arXiv:1503.05534 [INSPIRE].
R.R. Horgan, Z. Liu, S. Meinel and M. Wingate, Lattice QCD calculation of form factors describing the rare decays B → K * ℓ + ℓ − and B s → ϕℓ + ℓ −, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 094501 [arXiv:1310.3722] [INSPIRE].
R.R. Horgan, Z. Liu, S. Meinel and M. Wingate, Rare B decays using lattice QCD form factors, PoS(LATTICE2014)372 [arXiv:1501.00367] [INSPIRE].
A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A.A. Pivovarov and Y.M. Wang, Charm-loop effect in B → K (*) ℓ + ℓ − and B → K * γ, JHEP 09 (2010) 089 [arXiv:1006.4945] [INSPIRE].
S. Descotes-Genon, T. Hurth, J. Matias and J. Virto, Optimizing the basis of B → K * ℓℓ observables in the full kinematic range, JHEP 05 (2013) 137 [arXiv:1303.5794] [INSPIRE].
C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, D. van Dyk and C. Wacker, The Decay B → Kℓ + ℓ − at Low Hadronic Recoil and Model-Independent ΔB = 1 Constraints, JHEP 01 (2012) 107 [arXiv:1111.2558] [INSPIRE].
M. Beneke, T. Feldmann and D. Seidel, Exclusive radiative and electroweak b → d and b → s penguin decays at NLO, Eur. Phys. J. C 41 (2005) 173 [hep-ph/0412400] [INSPIRE].
A. Ali, G. Kramer and G.-h. Zhu, B → K + ℓ + ℓ − decay in soft-collinear effective theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 47 (2006) 625 [hep-ph/0601034] [INSPIRE].
LHCb, CMS collaboration, Observation of the rare B 0 s → μ + μ − decay from the combined analysis of CMS and LHCb data, Nature 522 (2015) 68 [arXiv:1411.4413] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.