Skip to main content
Log in

General analysis of decay chains with three-body decays involving missing energy

  • Published:
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model-independent analysis of decays of the form C + A ( = e, μ) is presented, including the possibility that this three-body decay is preceded by an additional decay step DjC. Here A, C and D are heavy new-physics particles and j stands for a quark jet. It is assumed that A escapes direct detection in a collider experiment, so that one cannot kinematically reconstruct the momenta of the new particles. Instead, information about their properties can be obtained from invariant-mass distributions of the visible decay products, i.e. the di-lepton (ℓℓ) and jet-lepton (jℓ) invariant-mass distributions. All possible spin configurations and renormalizable couplings of the new particles are considered, and explicit expressions for the invariant-mass distributions are derived, in a formulation that separates the coupling parameters from the spin and kinematic information. In a numerical analysis, it is shown how these properties can be determined independently from a fit to the m ℓℓ and m jℓ distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Athanasiou, C.G. Lester, J.M. Smillie and B.R. Webber, Distinguishing spins in decay chains at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 08 (2006) 055 [hep-ph/0605286] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. J.M. Smillie, Spin correlations in decay chains involving W bosons, Eur. Phys. J. C 51 (2007) 933 [hep-ph/0609296] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Burns, K. Kong, K.T. Matchev and M. Park, A general method for model-independent measurements of particle spins, couplings and mixing angles in cascade decays with missing energy at hadron colliders, JHEP 10 (2008) 081 [arXiv:0808.2472] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. C.-Y. Chen and A. Freitas, General analysis of signals with two leptons and missing energy at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 02 (2011) 002 [arXiv:1011.5276] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Han, I. Lewis and Z. Liu, Colored resonant signals at the LHC: largest rate and simplest topology, JHEP 12 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1010.4309] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Andrea, B. Fuks and F. Maltoni, Monotops at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 074025 [arXiv:1106.6199] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Kumar, A. Rajaraman and B. Thomas, Higher representations and multi-jet resonances at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 115005 [arXiv:1108.3333] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Grinstein, A.L. Kagan, J. Zupan and M. Trott, Flavor symmetric sectors and collider physics, JHEP 10 (2011) 072 [arXiv:1108.4027] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. I. Hinchliffe, F. Paige, M. Shapiro, J. Soderqvist and W. Yao, Precision SUSY measurements at CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5520 [hep-ph/9610544] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Gjelsten, D.J. Miller and P. Osland, Measurement of SUSY masses via cascade decays for SPS 1a, JHEP 12 (2004) 003 [hep-ph/0410303] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Allanach, C. Lester, M.A. Parker and B. Webber, Measuring sparticle masses in nonuniversal string inspired models at the LHC, JHEP 09 (2000) 004 [hep-ph/0007009] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Kawagoe, M. Nojiri and G. Polesello, A new SUSY mass reconstruction method at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 035008 [hep-ph/0410160] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Gjelsten, D.J. Miller and P. Osland, Measurement of the gluino mass via cascade decays for SPS 1a, JHEP 06 (2005) 015 [hep-ph/0501033] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Barr, Determining the spin of supersymmetric particles at the LHC using lepton charge asymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 596 (2004) 205 [hep-ph/0405052] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.M. Smillie and B.R. Webber, Distinguishing spins in supersymmetric and universal extra dimension models at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 10 (2005) 069 [hep-ph/0507170] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Alves, O. Eboli and T. Plehn, Its a gluino, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 095010 [hep-ph/0605067] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. L.-T. Wang and I. Yavin, Spin measurements in cascade decays at the LHC, JHEP 04 (2007) 032 [hep-ph/0605296] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. C. Kilic, L.-T. Wang and I. Yavin, On the existence of angular correlations in decays with heavy matter partners, JHEP 05 (2007) 052 [hep-ph/0703085] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Ehrenfeld, A. Freitas, A. Landwehr and D. Wyler, Distinguishing spins in decay chains with photons at the Large Hadron Collider, JHEP 07 (2009) 056 [arXiv:0904.1293] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. D.J. Miller, P. Osland and A. Raklev, Invariant mass distributions in cascade decays, JHEP 03 (2006) 034 [hep-ph/0510356] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Csáki, J. Heinonen and M. Perelstein, Testing gluino spin with three-body decays, JHEP 10 (2007) 107 [arXiv:0707.0014] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Edelhauser, W. Porod and R.K. Singh, Spin discrimination in three-body decays, JHEP 08 (2010) 053 [arXiv:1005.3720] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group Collaboration, J. Alcaraz et al., A combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints on the standard model, hep-ex/0612034 [INSPIRE].

  24. S. Choi, M. Drees, A. Freitas and P. Zerwas, Testing the Majorana nature of gluinos and neutralinos, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 095007 [arXiv:0808.2410] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Choi, et al., Dirac neutralinos and electroweak scalar bosons of N = 1/N = 2 hybrid supersymmetry at colliders, JHEP 08 (2010) 025 [arXiv:1005.0818] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, in Perspectives on supersymmetry II, G.L. Kane ed., World Scientifc, Singapore (2010), hep-ph/9709356 [INSPIRE].

  27. T. Appelquist, H.-C. Cheng and B.A. Dobrescu, Bounds on universal extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 035002 [hep-ph/0012100] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. B.A. Dobrescu and E. Pontón, Chiral compactification on a square, JHEP 03 (2004) 071 [hep-th/0401032] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. G. Burdman, B.A. Dobrescu and E. Pontón, Six-dimensional gauge theory on the chiral square, JHEP 02 (2006) 033 [hep-ph/0506334] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. LHC/LC Study Group collaboration, G. Weiglein et al., Physics interplay of the LHC and the ILC, Phys. Rept. 426 (2006) 47 [hep-ph/0410364] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A. Djouadi, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Decays of supersymmetric particles: the program SUSY-HIT (SUspect-SdecaY-HDECAY-InTerface), Acta Phys. Polon. B 38 (2007) 635 [hep-ph/0609292] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Freitas.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1110.6192

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, CY., Freitas, A. General analysis of decay chains with three-body decays involving missing energy. J. High Energ. Phys. 2012, 124 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2012)124

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2012)124

Keywords

Navigation