Skip to main content
Log in

Cohort differences in health, functioning and physical activity in the young-old Finnish population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: A mixed picture emerges from the international literature about secular and cohort changes in the health and functioning of older adults. We conducted a repeated population-based cross-sectional study to determine trends in health, functioning and physical activity in the young-old Finnish population. Methods: Representative samples of community-dwelling people aged 65–69 years in 1988 (n=362), 1996 (n=320) and 2004 (n=292) were compared in socio-economic status, self-rated health, chronic diseases, memory problems, ability to carry out instrumental activities of daily living, physical activity, and five-year mortality. Results: Significant improvement in all the investigated modalities, except that of chronic diseases, was observed in the newer cohorts. In logistic regression analysis, after controlling for socio-economic status and gender, cohort effects remained significant for memory problems, IADL difficulties and physical activity. Cox regression analyses showed significant improvement in survival when later cohorts were compared with the earlier ones. Conclusions: This study provides evidence of improving levels of socio-economic status, self-rated health, functioning, physical activity, and lower risk of mortality in the newer cohorts of the Finnish young-old, but this was not accompanied by a parallel diminution in chronic diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Statistics Finland 2009

  2. Crimmins EM. Trends in the health of the elderly. Ann Rev Public Health 2004; 25: 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jagger C, Matthews RJ, Matthews FE et al. Cohort differences in diseases and disability in the young-old: findings from the MRC Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC-CFAS). BMC Public Health 2007; 7: 156–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Manton KG, Gu X. Changes in the prevalence of chronic disability in the United States black and nonblack population above age 65 from 1982 to 1999. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 6354–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Freedman VA, Martin LG, Schoeni RF. Recent trends in disability and functioning among older adults in the United States. JAMA 2002; 288: 3137–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Manton KG. Recent declines in chronic disability in the elderly US population: risk factors and future dynamics. Ann Rev Public Health 2008; 29: 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoeni RF, Liang J, Bennet J, Sugisawa H, Fukya T, Cobayashi E. Trends in old-age functioning and disability in Japan. Popul Stud 2006; 60: 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Robine JM, Mormiche P, Cermet C. Examination of the causes and mechanisms of the increase in disability-free life expectancy. J Aging Health 1998; 10: 171–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis E, Beer J, Gligona C, Thorm A. Working papers in health and welfare, no. 2001/1. Accounting for change in disability and severe restriction, 1981–1998. Canberra, Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pitkälä KH, Valvanne J, Kulp S, Strandberg TE, Tilvis RS. Secular trends in self-reported functioning need for assistance and attitudes towards life: 10-year differences of three older cohorts. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001; 49: 596–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Winblad I, Jääskeläinen M, Kivelä S-L, Hiltunen P, Laippala P. Prevalence of disability in three birth cohorts at old age over time spans of 10 and 20 years. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 1019–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Spiers N, Jagger C, Clarke M. Physical function and perceived health: cohort differences and interrealtionships in older people. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1996; 51B: S226–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker MG, Ahasic K, Thorslund M. Health changes among Swedish oldest old: prevalence rates from 1992 and 2002 show increasing health problems. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2005; 60: 1351–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steen B. The elderly yesterday, today and tomorrow: aspect on cohort differences from the gerontological and geriatric population studies in Göteborg, Sweden (H70). Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2002; 35 (Suppl. 1): 359–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jagger C, Gillies C, Moscone F et al. Inequalities in healthy life years in the 25 countries of the European Union in 2005: a crossnational meta-regression analysis. Lancet 2008; 372: 2124–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoeymans N, Feskens EJM, van den Bos GAM, Kromhout D. Age, time and cohort effects on functional status and self-rated health in elderly men. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 1620–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Grundy E, Glaser K. Socio-demographic differences in the onset and progression of disability in early old age: a longitudinal study. Age Ageing 2000; 29: 149–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huisman M, Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity among the elderly: a European overview. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57: 861–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoogendijk E, van Groenou MB, van Tilburg T, Deeg D. Educational differences in functional limitations: comparisons of 55–65-year-olds in the Netherlands in 1992 and 2002. Int J Public Health 2008; 53: 281–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Melzer D, McWilliams B, Brayne C, Johnson T, Bond J. Socioeconomic status and the expectation of disability in old age: estimates for England. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000; 54: 286–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rautio N, Heikkinen E, Ebrahim S. Socio-economic position and its relationship to physical capacity among elderly people living in Jyväskylä, Finland: Five- and ten-year follow-up studies. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 2405–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Blair SN, Wei M. Sedentary habits, health, and function in older women and men. Am J Public Health 2000; 15: 1–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN et al. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendations from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 1435–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heikkinen E. Background, design and methods of the Evergreen project. J Aging Phys Act (Special Issue) 1998; 6: 106–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koskinen S, Aromaa A, Huttunen J, Teperi J (Eds). Health in Finland. National Public Health Institute, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pohjolainen P, Heikkinen E, Lyyra A-L, Helin S, Tyrkkö K. Socioeconomic status, health and life-style in two elderly cohorts in Jyväskylä. Scand J Soc Med 1997; 52 (Suppl.): 1–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jylhä M, Jokela J, Tolvanen E et al. The Tampere Longitudinal Study on Aging. Description of the study. Basic results on health and functional ability. Scand J Soc Med 1992; 47 (Suppl): 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heikkinen E, Leinonen R, Berg S, Schroll M, Steen B. Levels and associates of self-rated health among 75-year-old people living in three Nordic localities. In Heikkinen E, Berg S, Schroll M, Steen B, Viidik A, Eds. Functional status, health and aging: the NORA study. Facts, Research and Intervention in Geriatrics. Paris: Serdi Publisher, 1997: 121–48.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leinonen R, Heikkinen E, Jylhä M. Predictors of decline in selfassessments of health among older people. A five-year longitudinal study. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 1329–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Leinonen R, Heikkinen E, Jylhä M. A pattern of long-term predictors of self-rated health among older people. Aging Clin Exp Res 2001; 13: 454–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruoppila I, Suutama T. Cognitive functioning of 75- and 80-year-old people and changes during a 5-year follow-up. In Heikkinen E, Heikkinen R-L, Ruopppila I, Eds. Functional capacity and health of elderly people — the Evergreen project. Scand J Soc Med 1997; Suppl. 53; 44–65.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Finkel D, Reynolds CA, McArdle JJ, Pedersen KL. Cohort differences in trajectories of cognitive aging. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 2007; P286-94.

  33. Marengoni A, Von Strauss E, Rizzuto D, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L. The impact of chronic multimorbidity and disability on functional decline and survival in elderly persons. A community-based, longitudinal study. J Intern Med 2009; 265: 288–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Laslet P. A fresh map of life: the emergence of a third age. Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Karisto A. Finnish baby boomers and the emergence of the third age. IJAL 2007; 2: 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eino Heikkinen MD, PhD, MSc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heikkinen, E., Kauppinen, M., Rantanen, T. et al. Cohort differences in health, functioning and physical activity in the young-old Finnish population. Aging Clin Exp Res 23, 126–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03654777

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03654777

Key words

Navigation