Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Student and teacher perspectives on spelling

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper employs a mixed methods multiple case study approach to offer an insight into strategy-use in the teaching and learning of spelling within an Australian primary school context. Eight low-achieving spellers and eight high-achieving spellers aged between eight and 12 years were selected following completion of a normed dictation task comprising 70 words. Spelling errors produced by the students in the dictation task and their narrative and expository written texts were then analysed to determine potential breakdowns in phonological, orthographic and morphological processing. Finally, semi-structured interviews with the students and their teachers were then conducted to further elicit strategy-use among the students and to capture interactions between the teaching and learning of spelling. Data triangulation revealed that the high-achieving spellers were able to flexibly draw on a range of linguistic strategies while the low-achieving spellers relied on a sounding out approach. The findings also highlight the importance of explicitly teaching students to develop a repertoire of strategies, including morphological processing, and a need for teachers to develop confidence and knowledge of the linguistic processes involved in spelling. Implications for the teaching of spelling emphasise a need for pedagogical content knowledge, and for teachers to use metalanguage and to integrate quality children’s fiction and/or non-fiction texts when explicitly teaching spelling.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, A., Simmons, F. & Willis, C. (2015). Exploring relationships between working memory and writing: Individual differences associated with gender. Learning and Individual Differences,. 40, 101–107. doi: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.04.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K. (2014). A comprehensive definition of morphological awareness: Implications for assessment. Topics. in Language Disorders,. 34(3), 197–209. doi:10.1097/TLD.0000000000000019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K. & Lawrence, J. (2011). Contributions of morphological awareness skills to word-level reading and spelling in first-grade children with and without speech sound disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,. 54(5), 1312–1327. doi:10.1044/1092–4388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment & Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2016). NAP national assessment program. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/about/about.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, R. (2015). Spelling strategies and word formation processes. In R. Bahr & E. Silliman (Eds.), Routledge handbook of communication disorders.(pp. 193–203). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, R., Silliman, E. & Berninger, V. (2009). What spelling errors have to tell about vocabulary learning. In C. Woods & V. Connelly (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on reading and writing.(pp. 109–129). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, R., Silliman, E., Berninger, V. & Dow, M. (2012). Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1–9. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,. 55, 1587–1599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, R., Silliman, E., Danzak, R. & Wilkinson, L. (2015). Bilingual spelling patterns in middle school: It is more than transfer. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism,. 18(1), 73–91. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.878304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bear, D.R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S. & Johnston, F. (2012). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction.(5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear, D.R. & Templeton, S. (1998). Explorations in developmental spelling: Foundations for learning and teaching phonics, spelling and vocabulary. The Reading Teacher,. 52(3), 222–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Nagy, W. & Carlisle, J. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,. 39(2), 141–163. doi:10.1007/s10936–009–9130–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourassa, D. & Treiman, R. (2001). Spelling development and disability: The importance of linguistic factors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools,. 32, 172–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caravolas, M., Hulme, C. & Snowling, M.J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of memory and language,. 45(4), 751–774. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassady, J. & Smith, L. (2004). Acquisition of blending skills: Comparisons among body-coda, onset-rime, and phoneme blending tasks. Reading Psychology,. 25(4), 261–272. doi:10.1080/02702710490512307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassady, J., Smith, L. & Putman, S. (2008). Phonological awareness development as a discrete process: Evidence for an integrative model. Reading Psychology,. 29(6), 508–533. doi:10.1080/02702710802271966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, M., Treiman, R., Moats, L., Pollo, T. & Kessler, B. (2005). How do the spellings of children with dyslexia compare with those of nondyslexic children? Reading & Writing,. 18(1), 27–49. doi:10.1007/s11145–004–2345-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. & Myhill, D. (2016). Children talking about writing: Investigating metalinguistic understanding. Linguistics and Education,. 35, 100–108. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, N., Harris, N. & Williams, J. (2013). Individual differences in children’s literacy development: The contribution of orthographic knowledge. Reading and Writing,. 26(8), 1223–1239. doi:10.1007/s11145–012–9415–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.(4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critten, S., Connelly, V., Dockrell, J.E. & Walter, K. (2014). Inflectional and derivational morphological spelling abilities of children with Specific Language Impairment. Front Psychol,. 5, 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critten, S., Sheriston, L. & Mann, F. (2016). Young children’s spelling representations and spelling strategies. Learning and Instruction,. 46, 34–44. doi: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daffern, T. (2016). What happens when a teacher uses metalanguage to teach spelling? The Reading Teacher,. 70(4), 423–434. doi:10.1002/trtr.1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daffern, T., Mackenzie, N.M. & Hemmings, B. (2015). The development of a spelling assessment tool informed by Triple Word Form Theory. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy,. 38(2), 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daffern, T., Mackenzie, N.M. & Hemmings, B. (2017). Testing spelling: How does a dictation method measure up to a proofreading and editing format? Australian Journal of Language & Literacy,. 40(1), 28–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devonshire, V. & Fluck, M. (2010). Spelling development: Fine-tuning strategy-use and capitalising on the connections between words. Learning and Instruction,. 20, 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devonshire, V., Morris, P. & Fluck, M. (2013). Spelling and reading development: The effect of teaching children multiple levels of representation in their orthography. Learning and Instruction,. 25, 85–94. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockrell, J., Marshall, C. & Wyse, D. (2016). Teachers’ reported practices for teaching writing in England. Reading and Writing,. 29(3), 409–434. doi:10.1007/ s11145–015–9605–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. (1999). Phases of development in learning to read words. In J. Oakhill & R. Beard (Eds.), Reading Development and the Teaching of Reading: A Psychological Perspective.(pp. 79–108). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C., Nunes, S.R., Stahl, S.A. & Willows, D.M. (2012). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. In D. Wyse (Ed.), Literacy teaching and education.(Vol. 4, pp. 184–236). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing,. 62(1), 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365–2648.2007.04569.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington-Flint, L. (2015). Uncovering strategy profiles in young children’s reading and spelling. Learning and Individual Differences,. 42, 64–69. doi: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington-Flint, L., Stash, A. & Stiller, J. (2008). Monitoring variability and change in children’s spelling strategies. Educational Psychology,. 28(2), 133–149. doi:10.1080/01443410701471850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding-Barnsley, R. & Purdie, N. (2005). Teachers’ attitude to and knowledge of metalinguistics in the process of learning to read. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,. 33(1), 65–76. doi:10.1080/1359866052000341133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1980). Cognitive process in spelling. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, N., Abbott, R. & Berninger, V. (2010). Predicting poor, average, and superior spellers in grades 1 to 6 from phonological, orthographic, and morphological, spelling, or reading composites. Written Language and Literacy,. 13(1), 61–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S. (2007). Working memory: A system for learning. In R.K. Wagner, A.E. Muse & K.R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension.(pp. 233–248). NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, J.R. (2012). An analysis of developmental spelling in GNYS AT WRK. In D. Wyse (Ed.), Literacy teaching and education.(Vol. 3, pp. 347–357). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. & Santangelo, T. (2014). Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing,. 27(9), 1703–1743. doi:10.1007/s11145–014–9517–0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, M.C. & Macken-Horarik, M. (2015). Linguistically informed teaching of spelling: Toward a relational approach. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy,. 38(2), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Al Otaiba, S., Puranik, C.S., Folsom, J.S. & Gruelich, L. (2014). The contributions of vocabulary and letter writing automaticity to word reading and spelling for kindergartners. Reading & Writing,. 27(2), 237–253. doi:10.1007/s11145–013–9440–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohnen, S., Colenbrander, D., Krajenbrink, T. & Nickels, L. (2015). Assessment of lexical and non-lexical spelling in students in Grades 1–7. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties,. 20(1), 15–38. doi:10.1080/19404158.2015.1023209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohnen, S., Nickels, L. & Castles, A. (2009). Assessing spelling skills and strategies: A critique of available resources. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties,. 14(1), 113–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwong, T. & Varnhagen, C. (2005). Strategy development and learning to spell new words: Generalization of a process. Developmental Psychology,. 41(1), 148–159. doi:10.1037/0012–1649.41.1.148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, R., Williams, G. & Blaggan, S. (2013). Delay or deficit? Spelling processes in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Communication Disorders,. 46, 401–412. doi: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, B. & Kirk, C. (2014). Theoretical beliefs and instructional practices used for teaching spelling in elementary classrooms. Reading and Writing,. 27(3), 535–554. doi:10.1007/s11145–013–9457–0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D.M. (2015). Research and evaluation in education and psychology.(4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. (2014). What teachers don’t know and why they aren’t learning it: Addressing the need for content and pedagogy in teacher education. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties,. 19(2), 75–91. doi:10.1080/19404158.2014.941093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, T., Aylward, E., Berninger, V., Field, K., Grimme, A., Richards, A. & Nagy, W. (2006). Individual fMRI activation in orthographic mapping and morpheme mapping after orthographic or morphological spelling treatment in child dyslexics. Journal of Neurolinguistics,. 19(1), 56–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, T., Aylward, E., Field, K., Grimme, A., Raskind, W., Richards, A., … Berninger, V. (2006). Converging evidence for triple word form theory in children with dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology,. 30(1), 547–589. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn3001_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, T., Berninger, V. & Fayol, M. (2009). fMRI activation differences between 11-year-old good and poor spellers’ access in working memory to temporary and longterm orthographic representations. Journal of Neurolinguistics,. 22(4), 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittle-Johnson, B. & Siegler, R.S. (1999). Learning to spell: Variability, choice, and change in children’s strategy use. Child Development,. 70(2), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sénéchal, M., Basque, M.T. & Leclaire, T. (2006). Morphological knowledge as revealed in children’s spelling accuracy and reports of spelling strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,. 95(4), 231–254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, A.C., Sinatra, G.M. & Reynolds, R.E. (2008). The development of children’s orthographic knowledge: A microgenetic perspective. Reading Research Quarterly,. 43(3), 206–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheriston, L., Critten, S. & Jones, E. (2016). Routes to reading and spelling: Testing predictions of dual route theory. Reading Research Quarterly,. 51(4), 403–417. doi: http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1002/rrq.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R.S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children’s thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silliman, E., Bahr, R. & Peters, M. (2006). Spelling patterns in preadolescents with atypical language skills: Phonological, morphological, and orthographic factors. Developmental Neuropsychology,. 29(1), 93–123. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2901_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sproule, W. (2006). Content analysis. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social research methods: An Australian perspective.(pp. 113–134). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, H.L., Snow, P.C., Eadie, P.A. & Goldfield, S.R. (2016). Language and reading instruction in early years’ classrooms: The knowledge and self-rated ability of Australian teachers. Annals of Dyslexia,. 66, 28–54. doi:10.1007/s11881–015–0112–0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research.(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Topfer, C. & Arendt, D. (2009). Guiding thinking for effective spelling. Carlton: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (2017a). Learning to spell words: Findings, theories, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading,. 21(4), 1–12. doi:10.1080/10888438.2017.1296449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (2017b). Learning to spell: Phonology and beyond. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 1–11. doi:10.1080/02643294.2017.1337630

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (2018). Teaching and learning spelling. Child Development Perspectives,. 12(3), 1–5. doi:10.1111/cdep.12292

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. & Kessler, B. (2006). Spelling as statistical learning: Using consonantal context to spell vowels. Journal of Educational Psychology,. 98(3), 642–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. & Kessler, B. (2014). How children learn to write words. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Varnhagen, C., McCallum, M. & Burstow, M. (1997). Is children’s spelling naturally stage-like? Reading and Writing,. 9, 451–481. doi:10.1023/A:1007903330463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, D. & Birmingham, P. (2003). Using research instruments: A guide for researchers. London & New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K. (2006). Analysing qualitative data. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social research methods: An Australian perspective.(pp. 257–280). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Canberra, Australia

    Tessa Daffern

  2. Coventry University, Australia

    Sarah Critten

Authors
  1. Tessa Daffern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah Critten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daffern, T., Critten, S. Student and teacher perspectives on spelling. AJLL 42, 40–57 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652025

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652025

Search

Navigation