Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reading, writing and co-authorship in blogs

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The blog is a co-constructed online space that rivals the website as a publication platform. While adults, teens and children author blogs, little is known about the younger participants’ practices. Further, despite the blog’s interactive nature, the impact of collaborative affordances on meaning is yet to be fully articulated. This paper reveals how blog authors employ the technical affordances of blogs to position readers as meaning co-constructors. Child blog authors and their readers achieve three types of co-authorship by using tags and comments, as revealed by a systemic functional linguistics (SFL) analysis. Analysis shows that blog co-authorship blurs the line between ‘author’ and ‘reader’, unsettling traditional notions of writing and reading. Curriculum and policy definitions of literacy that separate reading and writing are placed under pressure by the co-constructive nature of web-mediated texts of power such as blogs, suggesting that collaborative text realisation may need to be accounted for in future curriculum design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adlington, R. (2016). Young children’s online authoring: The techno-semiotic co-construction of blogs.(PhD). Australian Catholic University, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adlington, R. (2017). Teddy bear, teddy bear: modal hybridity and the co-constructed blog. In P. Chappell & J.S. Knox (Eds.), Transforming Contexts: Papers from the 44th International Systemic Functional Congress.(pp. 26–32). Wollongong, Australia: The Organising Committee of the 44th International Systemic Functional Congress. http://www.isfla.org/Systemics/Conferences/ISFC_2017_Proceedings.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Adlington, R. (in press). The multimodal blog: co-authored texts in the primary and middle years classroom. In H. de Silva Joyce & S. Feez (eds.), Multimodality Across Classrooms: Learning About and Through Different Modalities) (Routledge Studies in Multimodality) Series–K. OHalloran, series editor). London & New York: Routledge.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2012). Children’s Participation in Cultural and Leisure Activities. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/4901.0~Apr+2012~Main+Features~Internet+and+mobile+p hones?OpenDocument

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2009). Click and Connect: Young Australians’ use of Online Social Media: 01 Qualitative research report. Retrieved from https://www.acma.gov.au/-/media/mediacomms/ Report/pdf/01-Qualitative-research-report-pdf.pdf?la=en

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2010). Trends in Media Use by Children and Young People. Retrieved from https://www.acma.gov.au/-/media/Research-and-Analysis/Research/pdf/ACMA-Research-Report-Trends-in-Media-Use-by-Children.PDF

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2015). The Australian Curriculum: English version 8.3. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/english/rationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1981 (1975)). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: The University of Texas Press.

  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). The problem of speech genres (V. McGee, Trans.). In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (pp. 60–101). Texas: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek, M. (2008). Corpora and discourse: a Threepronged approach to analyzing linguistic data.. Paper presented at the HCSNet Workshop on Designing the Australian National Corpus: Mustering Languages, Somerville, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernadini, S., Baroni, M. & Evert, S. (2006). A WaCky introduction. In M. Baroni & S. Bernadini (Eds.), Wacky! Working Papers on the Web as Corpus. (pp. 9–40). Bologna, Italy: Gedit Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer, J. & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: a social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication,. 25(2), 166–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Silva Joyce, H. & Feez, S. (Eds) (in press). Multimodality across classrooms: Learning about and through different modalities) (Routledge Studies in Multimodality) Series–K. OHalloran, series editor). London & New York: Routledge.

  • Djonov, E. (2005). Analysing the organisation of information in websites: From hypermedial design to systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis.(PhD). University of New South Wales, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingo, M., Jewitt, C. & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodal social semiotics: writing in online contexts. In J. Roswell & K. Pahl (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Literary Studies. (p. 251). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efimova, L. (2009). Passion at work: blogging practices of knowledge workers..(PhD), Utrecht University, Enschede, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowley, C. (2011). Publishing the confidential: an ethnographic study of young Irish bloggers..(PhD), Dublin City University, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelbmann, M. & Delamer, A. (2015). Usage of content management systems for websites. Retrieved from http://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_management/all

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillen, J. & Merchant, G. (2013). Contact calls: twitter as a dialogic social and linguistic practice. Language Sciences,. 35, 47–58. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar.(2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (4th ed.). Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S.C. (2013). Discourse in Web 2.0: familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In D. Tannen & A.M. Trester (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. (pp. 1–29). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S.C., Scheidt, L.A., Wright, E. & Bonus, S. (2005). Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology and People,. 18(2), 142–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S. (2008). Adolescent literacies for critical social and community engagement. (PhD). University of New England, Armidale, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, S., Droga, L. & Feez, S. (2012). Grammar and Meaning. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robinson, A.J. & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Retrieved from MacArthur Foundation website: https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2005). Gains and losses: new forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. Computers and Composition,. 22, 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhart, A. & Madden, M. (2005). Teen Content Creators and Consumers. Retrieved from Pew Research Center website: http://www.pewinternet.org/2005/11/02/ teen-content-creators-and-consumers/

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2014). Mediating the voice of personal blogging: an analysis of Chinese A-list personal blogs. Observatorio,. 8(1), 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M. (2003). Appraisal and the special instructiveness of narrative. Text,. 23(3), 285–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Cortesi, S. & Gasser, U. (2013). Teens and Technology. 2013. Retrieved from Ambrose Institute website: https://www.ambroseinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Pew-Res-TeensTech-2013.pdf

  • Markham, A. & Buchanan, E. (2012). Ethical decisionmaking and Internet research 2.0: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Retrieved from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.R. (1994). Modelling big texts: a systemic functional approach to multi-genericity. Network,. 21, 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause.(2nd ed.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Oakville: Equinox Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. (2010). Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofcom. (2014). Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. Retrieved from Ofcom website: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/media-literacy/ media-use-attitudes-14/Childrens_2014_Report.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2007). Audiences as media producers: content analysis of 260 blogs. In M. Tremayne (Ed.), Blogging, Citizenship, and the Future of Media. (pp. 21–38). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimpour, S. (2014). Blogs: a resource of online interactions to develop stance taking. Procedia–Social and Behavioural Sciences,. 98, 1502–1507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serfaty, V. (2004). The Mirror and the Veil: An Overview of American Online Diaries and Blogs. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Rodopi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Towndrow, P.A., Nelson, M.E. & Yusuf, W.F.B.M. (2013). Squaring literacy assessment with multimodal design: an analytic case for semiotic awareness. Journal of Literacy Research,. 45(4), 327–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J.B. (2002). Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: human subjects issues and methodological myopia. Ethics and Information Technology,. 4(3), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J. (2016). Adolescents’ dialogic composing with mobile phones. Journal of Literacy Research,. 48(2), 164–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L. (2009). Filter blogs vs. personal journals: understanding the knowledge production gap on the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,. 14, 532–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zappavigna, M. (2012). The Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UK

    Rachael Adlington & Susan Feez

Authors
  1. Rachael Adlington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susan Feez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adlington, R., Feez, S. Reading, writing and co-authorship in blogs. AJLL 42, 5–16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652022

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652022

Search

Navigation