Skip to main content
Log in

The complexity of teaching internet inquiry with iPads in the early years

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purposefully and effectively locating and reading information on the internet is a critically important aspect of contemporary information literacy. Increasingly younger children seek to develop skills in internet searching and reading to serve their needs and desires both in and out of school. This paper provides a close-up examination of one teacher’s practices as she guides students who are in the second and third year of their schooling to undertake internet research. By providing an analysis of a selection of interactions taken from one classroom session, I illustrate the complexity of practices involved, practices that interweave traditional ‘print’ and new ‘digital’ materials and skills. The analysis highlights the interdependence of the traditional and the new as the teacher and her students strategically assembled diverse digital and ‘non-digital’ resources, modes and channels in mutually-supportive ways through the practice of fit-for-purpose inquiry, reading and composition. This practice is contextualised within the often contradictory popular and public discourses that surround early years literacy education and the place of new digital media - discourses that often fail to recognise and affirm teachers’ expertise in these complex undertakings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (n.d.). My School Glossary: Index of Community SocioEducational Advantage (ICSEA). Retrieved from https://www.myschool.edu.au/AboutUs/Glossary#G2

  • Bearne, E. (2009). Multimodality, literacy and texts: Developing a discourse. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9 (2), 156–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloome, D., Carter, S.P., Christian, B.M., Otto, S. & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse Analysis and the Study of Classroom Language and Literacy Events: A Microethnographic Perpective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, K. & Ragusa, A.T. (2014). A sociological analysis of Australia’s NAPLAN and My School Senate Inquiry submissions: The adultification of childhood? Critical Studies in Education, 55 (2), 170–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brem, S.K., Russell, J. & Weems, L. (2001). Science on the Web: Student evaluations of scientific arguments. Discourse Processes, 32, 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D., Banaji, S., Carr, D., Cranmer, S. & Willett, R. (2005). The Media Literacy of Children and Young People: A Review of the Research Literature. London: London Knowledge Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corio, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56, 458–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coiro, J. & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers as they search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 214–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corio, J. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of offline reading skills, online readings skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43 (4), 352–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreher, M.J. (2002). Children searching and using information text: A critical part of comprehension’. In C.C. Block & M. Pressley (eds.), Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices (pp. 289–304). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidel, R., Davies, R.K. & Douglass, M.H. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankham, J. & MacRae, C. (2011). Ethnography. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (eds.), Theory and Methods in Social Science (2nd edition) (pp. 34–42). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2011). A contribution to the critique of the political economy of Google. Fast Capitalism, 8 (1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handsfield, L.J., Crumpler, T.P. & Dean, T.R. (2010). Tactical negotiations and creative adaptations: The discursive production of literacy curriculum and teacher identities across space-times. Reading Research Quarterly, 45 (4), 405–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honan, E. (2009). Fighting the rip: Using digital texts in classrooms. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8 (3), 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honan, E. (2010). Mapping discourses in teachers’ talk about using digital texts in classrooms. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31 (2), 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. (2011). Framing ICT, teachers and learners in Australian school education ICT policy. Australian Educational Researcher, 38 (4), 417–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julien, H. & Barker, S. (2009). How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research, 31 (1), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kervin, L., Verenikina, I., Jones, P. & Beath, P. (2013). Investigating synergies between literacy, technology and classroom practice. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 36(3), 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. & Jewitt, C. (2003). Introduction. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal Literacy (pp. 1–18). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (2013). Visual images: Interpretive strategies in multimodal texts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4 (6), 1259–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. & Redpath, T. (2014). ‘Smart’ technologies in early years literacy education: A meta-narrative of paradigmatic tensions in iPad use in an Australian preparatory classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 14 (2), 147–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. (2014). Onine and offline play. In A. Burn & C. Richards (Eds.), Children’s Games in the New Media Age: Childlore, Media and the Playground (pp. 109–132). London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, L.L. & Heydon, R.M. (2015). Orchestrating literacies: Print literacy learning opportunities within multimodal intergenerational ensembles. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15 (2), 227–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K.A. (2010). A review of the ‘digital turn’ in New Literacy Studies. Review of Educational Research, 80 (2), 246–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K. (2007). Creativity in events and practices: A lens for understanding children’s multimodal texts, Literacy, 41 (2), 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Player-Koro, C. (2013). Hype, hope and ICT in teacher education: a Bernsteinian perspective. Learning, Media and Technology, 38 (1), 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, L. & Honan, E. (2005). Literarily lost: The quest for quality literacy agendas in early childhood education. In N. Yelland (Ed.), Critical issues in early childhood education (pp. 197–223). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmar-Dobler, E. (2003). Reading on the Internet: The link between literacy and technology. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(1), 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, T.J. & O’Sullivan, M.K. (2005). Analyzing student search strategies: Making a case for integrating information literacy skills into the curriculum. Teacher Librarian, 33, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2008). From state-of-the-art to state-of-the-actual? Introduction to a special issue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 17(2), 83–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serafini, F. (2011). Expanding perspectives for comprehending visual images in multimodal texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54 (5), 342–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A., Walsh, M. & Rowsell, J. (2013). The digital reading path: researching modes and multidirectionality with iPads. Literacy, 47, 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souto-Otero, M. & Beneito-Montagut, R. (2013). ‘Power on’: Googlecracy, privatisation and the standardisation of sources. Journal of Education Policy, 28 (4), 481–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (n.d.). Victorian Curriculum, Level 1 scope and sequence for English. Retrieved from http://victoriancurriculum.vcaa.vic.edu.au/english/introduction/scope-and-sequence

  • Walsh, M. & Simpson, A. (2014). Exploring literacies through touch pad technologies: The dynamic materiality of modal interactions. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37 (2), 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M. (2011). Multimodal Literacy: Researching Classroom Practice. Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M., Asha, J. & Sprainger, N. (2007). Reading digital texts. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 30 (1), 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Lamon, M., Messina, R. & Reeve, R. (2007). Socio-cognitive dynamics of knowledge building in the work of 9-and 10-year-olds. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55 (2), 117–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lynch, J. The complexity of teaching internet inquiry with iPads in the early years. AJLL 40, 186–198 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651997

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651997

Navigation