Skip to main content
Log in

So how do you teach literacy in teacher education?: Literacy/English teacher educators’ goals and pedagogies

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Given expanding concepts of literacy and evolving communication patterns literacy teacher educators face a daunting task–preparing student teachers for a world where literacy is very complicated and contested. This paper addresses two key questions: What are the elements of a pedagogy of literacy teacher education? What opportunities for learning do literacy/English teacher educators offer to help student teachers understand the changing conception of literacy? For this research 28 literacy/English teacher educators in four countries were interviewed three times. Two overall conclusions are: the need to anchor their course in the concept of literacy as expanding and evolving; and to approach literacy teacher education holistically. Three elements of a pedagogy of literacy teacher education are discussed in this paper; that there is a need to: value and respond to diversity; read, discuss, and analyse a range of texts and genres; create authentic reflection activities. These elements are relevant for our increasingly diverse student body and can work dialogically. This paper provides a broad road map for literacy teacher educators who are often faced with conflicting messages from governments and feel tremendous pressure to teach to the test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvermann, D. (2008). Why bother theorizing adolescents’ online literacies for classroom practice and research? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anzaldua, G. (1999). Borderlands/la frontera: The new mestiza (3rd edition). San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. & Forzani, F. (2011). Teaching Skillful. The Effective Educator, 68(4), 40–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, P. & K. Harris. (2010). Becoming a University Lecturer in Teacher Education: Expert School Teachers Reconstructing Their Pedagogy and Identity. Professional Development in Education, 36(1–2), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, P., Harris, K. & Murray, J. (2007). Becoming a teacher educator: Guidelines for the induction of newly appointed lecturers in initial teacher education. Bristol: The Higher Education Academy. http://www.escalate.ac.k

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, J. & Webb, A. (Eds.) (2015). Reclaiming English language arts methods courses: Critical issues and challenges for teacher educators in top-down times. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (Eds) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. & Miller, D. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, C., Harre, R. & C. Tagg. (2002). ‘Qualitative research and computing: Methodological issues and practices in using QSR NVivo and NUD*IST.’ International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5(3) 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (2010). Tracing literacy journeys: The use of the literacy autobiography in preservice teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(4), 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, V., McNicholl & Pendry A. (2012). Institutional conceptualisations of teacher education as academic work in England. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 685–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Supporting teacher educators for better learning outcomes. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J. (2013). Globalisation, neoliberalism, and the reform of teacher education in England. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiso, M., Spencer, R., Ngo, L. & Campano, G. (2013). Critical inquiry into literacy teacher education: Accounting for students. In C. Kosnik, J. Rowsell, P. Williamson, R. Simon, C. Beck (Eds.), Literacy teacher educators: Preparing student teachers for a changing world (pp. 51–64). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gove, M. (2010). All Pupils Will Learn Our Island Story. http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2010/10/Michael_Gove_All_pupils_will_learn_our_island_story.aspx. Accessed May 7, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Hammerness, K. & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 15(2), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. (2011). Framework for Teaching Practice: A Brief History of an Idea. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2836–2843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyton, E. & McIntyre, J. (1990). Student teaching and school experiences. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 514–534). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan-Fenton, C. (2010). Fatty Legs. Toronto: Annick Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan-Fenton, C. (2011). Stranger at Home. Toronto: Annick Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. (2006). Knowledge and vision in teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. (2016). Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, A. (2009). E-learning: You don’t always get what you hope for. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(2), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik, C. & Beck, C. (2009). Priorities in teacher education: The 7 key elements of preservice preparation. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik, C., Menna, L., Dharmashi, P., Miyata, C. & Beck, C. (2013). A foot in many camps: Literacy teacher educators acquiring knowledge across many realms and juggling multiple identities. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39(5), 523–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik, C., Menna, L. & Dharamshi, P. (2016a). Preparing student teachers to be literacy teachers: Literacy teacher educators balancing multiple demands. In N. Maynes & B. Hattie (Eds.) Hiring, Supporting, and Retaining New Teachers Across Canada (pp. 22–41). Canadian Association for Teacher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik, C., Beck, C. & Goodwin, L. (2016b). Reform efforts in teacher education. In J. Loughran & M.L. Hamilton (Eds.). Handbook on Teacher Education (pp. 207–224). Dordetcht: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, W. (2008). 101 damnations: The persistence of criticism and the absence of evidence about teach education in Australia. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education: Understanding teaching and learning about teaching. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytle, S. (2013). Foreword: The critical literacies of teaching. In C. Kosnik, J. Rowsell, P. Williamson, R. Simon, C. Beck (Eds.), Literacy teacher educators: Preparing student teachers for a changing world (pp. xv–xix). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B. (2016). Multi-modalities in literacy/English education courses. In C. Kosnik, S. White, C. Beck, B. Marshall, A.L. Goodwin & J. Murray. (Eds.) Building bridges: Rethinking literacy teacher education in a digital era (pp. 105–117). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M., Kazemi, E. & Kavanagh, S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menna, L. (2016). ‘Times are a changing and you’ve got to keep up’: Negotiating multiple literacies within the context of teacher education. In C. Kosnik, S. White, C. Beck, B. Marshall, L. Goodwin & J. Murray. (Eds.) Building bridges: Rethinking literacy teacher education in a digital era (pp. 17–30. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milner, H.R. & Laughter, J.C. (2015). But good intentions are not enough: Preparing teacher to center race and poverty. The Urban Review, 47(2), 341–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. & Passy, R. (2014). Primary teacher education in England: 40 years on. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 492–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Punch, K. (2014). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risko, V., Roller, C., Cummins, C., Bean, R., Block, C., Anders, P. & Flood, J. (2008). A critical analysis of research on reading teacher education. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 252–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2) 4–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1992). Research on teaching: A historical and personal perspective in F. Oser, A. Dick & J.L. Patry, Ed. Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 14–91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2000). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swennen, A. & Van der Klink, M. (2009). Becoming a teacher educator: Theory and practice for teacher educators. Dordretcht: Springer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (2014). Recent developments in teacher training and their consequences for the ‘University Project’ in Education. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 466–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, P. (2013). Engaging literacy practices through inquiry and enactment in teacher education. In C. Kosnik, J. Rowsell, P. Williamson, R. Simon, C. Beck (Eds.), Literacy teacher educators: Preparing student teachers for a changing world (pp. 135–148). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: a personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kosnik, C., Menna, L., Dharamshi, P. et al. So how do you teach literacy in teacher education?: Literacy/English teacher educators’ goals and pedagogies. AJLL 40, 59–71 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651984

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651984

Navigation