Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hope and challenge in The Australian Curriculum: Implications for EAL students and their teachers

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My purpose in this paper is to address the place of English as a Second Language (EAL) students in The Australian Curriculum. Given the significant numbers of EAL students in schools, I argue that overall responsibility for education of EAL students is a mainstream, rather than minority, issue and that it is therefore legitimate to ask to what extent and how EAL students are positioned in the Curriculum. I begin the paper by addressing the needs of EAL students and the domains of knowledge required of mainstream teachers who work with such students in their classes. I suggest that these domains, while most obviously including extensive knowledge of language, literacy and language development, also include in-depth curriculum knowledge and knowledge of how to plan and implement programs characterised by high intellectual challenge and high support. I ask to what extent these domains of knowledge are acknowledged in The Australian Curriculum, and what guidance and support are provided for teachers in relation to them. I argue that within the constraints of what is possible in a national curriculum, developments to date offer considerable hope for EAL students and the teachers who work with such students, but they also present some challenges. I conclude by offering some suggestions of how these challenges may be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA, formerly National Curriculum Board) (2009). The Shape of the Australian Curriculum: English. Version 2.0. Melbourne: Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://wwww.acara.edu.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2011a). The Shape of the Curriculum. Version 3. Sydney, Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2011b). English as an Additional Language or Dialect: Teacher Resource. Version 1.2. http://www.acara.edu.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2011c). National Assessment Program (NAP). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2012a). The Australian Curriculum, English, Version 3.0. Sydney: Australian Curriculum assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2012b). The Australian Curriculum, Science, Version 3.0. Sydney: Australian Curriculum assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATESOL, NSW (2010). Response to draft K-10 Australian Curriculum in English, history, mathematics and science. 30 May, 2010. Retrieved from www.tesol.org.au/Issues/ Australian-Curricuum

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasquillo, A. & London, C. (1993). Parents and Schools, New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F. (2005). Language Education in the Primary Years. Sydney: University of NSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F. & Derewianka, B. (2008). School Discourse; Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F. & Martin, J.R. (1997). Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia, (2011). Literacy and Numeracy Pilots: Final Report. Report of Successful Language Learners’ project. Australian Government, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins J. (1996). Negotiating Identites: Education for Empowerment in a Diverse Society. Ontario: Californian Association for Bilingual Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (2000). Language, Power & Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and Theoretical Status of the Distinction. In Street, B. & N.H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd Edition, Volume 2: Literacy (pp. 71–83). New York: Springer Science + Business Media LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. & Schon, E. (1996). Who Teachers and Why: Dilemmas for Building a Profession for Twenty-First Century School. In J. Sikula. T. Buttery & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 67–101). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derewianka, B. (2012) Knowledge about Language in the Australian Curriculum: English. This Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufficy, P. (2005). Designing Learning for diverse classrooms. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning: Teaching Second Language Learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2008). ‘It was taught good and I learned a lot’: Intellectual practices and ESL learners in the middle years. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31 (2), 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2009). Challenging Expectations: literacy, intellectual quality and English language learners in the middle years. Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. 1990. Is Learning to Read and Write the Same as Learning to Speak. In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy for a Changing World (pp. 26–53). Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. (2008). Intellectual Challenge and ESL Students: Implications of quality teaching initiatives. Special Focus Issue, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31 (2), 128–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. (2009). High Challenge, high support programs with ESL learners: A teacher-researcher collaboration. In J. Miller, M. Gearon & A. Kostogriz (Eds.), Linguistically and culturally diverse classrooms: New dilemmas for teachers (pp. 56–74). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. (2011) Working with Children who speak English as an Additional Language: an Australian perspective on what primary teachers need to know. In S. Ellis & E. McCartney (Eds.), Applied Linguistics and Primary School Teaching (pp. 32–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. & Derewianka, B. (1999). ESL and literacy education: Revisiting the relationship. Prospect: A Journal of Australian TESOL, 14 (2), 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting Scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20 (1), 6–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. & Macken-Horarik, M. (1999). Critical Literacy: Challenges and Questions for ESL Classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 33 (3), 528–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. & Macken-Horarik, M. (2001). Teachers’ Voices, Teachers’ Practices: Insider perspectives on literacy education. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24 (2), 112–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. & Chen, H. (2012). Teachers’ Knowledge about Language: Issues of Pedagogy and Expertise. This Issue

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladwig, J., Smith, M., Gore, J., Amosa, W. & Griffiths, T. (2007). Quality of pedagogy and student achievement: multi-level replication of authentic pedagogy. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education conference, Fremantle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, K. & Humphrey, S. (2012). A multi-level grammatical toolkit for the Australian Curriculum: English. This Issue

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M. (1996). Literacy and Learning across the Curriculum: towards a model of register for secondary school teachers. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds), Literacy in Society (pp. 232–278). New York: Addison Wesley, Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macken-Horarik, M. Love K. & Unsworth, L. (2011). Grammatics good enough for school English in the 21st Century. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34 (1), 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1994). Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education. In B. Steirer & J. Maybin (Eds.), Language Literacy and Learning in educational practice (pp. 92–110). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2004) Social Languages and Schooling: The Uptake of Sociolinguistic Perspectives in School. In M Hawkins (Ed.), Language Learning and Teacher Education (pp. 113–146). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F.M. & Associates, (1996). Authentic Achievement: Restructuring Schools for Intellectual Quality. San Francisco: Lossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F.M., Marks H. & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic Pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104, 280–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales, Department of School Education (1998). English K–6 Syllabus, Board of Studies, NSW, Department of School Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. (1989). On the Language and Authority of Textbooks. In S. de Castell, A. Luke & C. Luke (Eds.), Language, Authority and Criticism: Readings on the School Textbook. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: a Sociocultural Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Wells, G. & Claxton, G. (2002). (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st Century. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

    Jennifer Hammond

Authors
  1. Jennifer Hammond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammond, J. Hope and challenge in The Australian Curriculum: Implications for EAL students and their teachers. AJLL 35, 223–240 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651884

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651884

Search

Navigation