Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge about Language in the Australian Curriculum: English

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Somewhat surprisingly, an explicit knowledge about language has been often absent from English curricula. The new Australian Curriculum: English (ACARA, 2012) has taken a fairly radical step in placing knowledge about language at the core of classroom practice, thereby raising the issue of an appropriate model of language to inform the Language Strand of the Curriculum. This paper will outline the rationale behind the Language Strand, and will then make explicit its underlying model of language. The paper thus provides a context for the ensuing articles in this Special Focus Issue of AJLL, which take up various concerns in relation to implementation of the Curriculum and especially of the Language strand of the English Curriculum. The paper concludes by canvassing a number of issues relevant to the development and implementation of the Curriculum: student outcomes, terminology, and pedagogy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, R. (2005). Knowledge about the teaching of [sentence] grammar: The state of play. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4 (3), 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), (formerly National Curriculum Board) (2008). National English Curriculum–Framing Paper. Sydney: Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from www.ncb.org.au.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), (formerly National Curriculum Board) (2009). The Shape of the Australian Curriculum: English. Sydney: Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/publications.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2008). National Assessment Program (NAP). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2012). Australian Curriculum: English. Version 3.0. Sydney: Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/English/Curriculum/F-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddock, R., Lloyd-Jones, R. & Schoer, L. (1963). Research in written composition. Urbana, IL: NCTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, F. (2005). Language Education in the Primary School. Sydney: UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firkins, A., Forey, G. & Sengupta, S. (2007). Teaching Writing to low proficiency EFL students. ELT Journal, 61 (4), 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkeryd, J.W. (2006). Writing with an Attitude. Appraisal and student texts in the school subject of Swedish. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Linguistica Upsaliensia 5. Uppsala.

  • French, R. (2012). Learning the Grammatics of Quoted Speech Benefits for Punctuation and Expressive Reading. This Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. (2010). SFL: A theory of language for Dynamic Assessment of EAL. NALDIC Quarterly, 8 (1), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard, M. & Martin, J. (2010). Grammar and literacy learning. In D. Fisher & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts (3rd ed., pp. 297–304. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhard, M., Willett, J., Jimenez, J. & Piedra, A. (2010). Systemic functional linguistics, teachers’ professional development, and ELLs’ academic literacy practices. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher Preparation for Linguistically Diverse Classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 91–110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging Discourses in the ESL Classroom. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. (2009). The Essential Halliday. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M.A.K. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd Edition). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. (2012). Hope and Challenge in The Australian Curriculum: Implications for EAL students and their teachers. This Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20 (1), 6–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on Written Composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: NCTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. (2001). Grammar teaching and writing skills: the research evidence. Syntax in the Schools, 17:1–6. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (2010). Teaching, learning and talking: Mapping the ‘trail of fire’ English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 9 (2), 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. & Chen, H. (2012). Teachers’ Knowledge about Language: Issues of Pedagogy and Expertise. This Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.R. (1985). Factual Writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press. (republished by Oxford University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.R. (2009). Genres and language learning: a social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20 (Special Edition on ‘Foreign/second language acquisition as meaning-making: a systemic-functional approach’ Edited by H. Byrnes). 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.R. & White, P.R.R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, G. (2006). Textbook language, teacher mediation, classroom interaction and learning processes: The case of natural and social science textbooks in Barranquilla, Colombia (pp. 879–894). Proceedings of 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress, São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myhill, D. (2005). Ways of knowing: Writing with grammar in mind. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, December 2005, 4 (3), 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polias, J. & Dare, B. (2006). Towards a pedagogical grammar. In R. Whittaker, M. O’Donnell and A. McCabe (Eds.) Language and Literacy: Functional Approaches (pp. 123–143). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. & Martin, J.R. (in press 2012). Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saracini-Palombo, L. & Custance, B. (2011). Making connections in the classroom. In Department of Education and Children’s Services, How Language Works: Success in Literacy and Learning (pp. 157–168). DECS Publishing: South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleppegrell, M., Achugar, M. & Oteiza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38 (1), 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South Australian Department for Education and Child Development (SA DECD) (2011). ESL Scope and Scales. Retrieved from http://www.decd.sa.gov.au/literacy/pages/esl/scope/?reFlag=1

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2005). Grammatics in schools. In J. Webster, C. Matthiessen and R. Hasan (Eds.) Continuing Discourse on Language, Volume 1, (pp. 281–310). London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Derewianka, B. Knowledge about Language in the Australian Curriculum: English. AJLL 35, 127–146 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651879

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651879

Navigation