Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping the archive: An Examination of Research Reported in AJLL 2000–2005

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amidst commissioned research reports and policy reforms in literacy education, this paper examines research reported in the 2000–2005 archive of the Australian Journal of Language and Literacy (AJLL). This focus arises from the selective inclusion of literacy research in recent literacy education policy reform documents in Australia and overseas and the exclusion of other research, including research from this AJLL 2000/5 archive. Given the high national and international standing of AJLL, we felt it was timely and important to engage in a retrospective mapping exercise with this collection of research and critically examine its relationship to literacy education policy. So doing forms part of our broader concerns about connections between literacy research, policy and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References (in addition to AJLL 2000–2005 references in Appendix 1)

  • Allington, R.L. (2002). Big brother & the national reading curriculum: how ideology trumped evidence. Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R.L. (2005). Five Missing Pillars of Scientific Reading Instruction. Accessed from http://www.readingrecovery.org/pdf/conferences/NC07/Handouts/Allington_Five_Missing_Pillars.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R.L. & Johnston, (2002). Reading to learn: lessons from exemplary fourth-grade classrooms. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allington, R.L. & Woodside-Jiron, H. (1999). The politics of literacy teaching: how “research” shaped educational policy. Educational Researcher, 28(8), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anstey, M. & Bull, G. (2003). The literacy labyrinth, 2nd Edn. Sydney: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, B. (2000). The impact of mandated change on teachers. In N. Bacsia & A. Hargreaves (eds.), The sharp edge of educational change: teaching, reading and the results of reform (pp. 112–128). New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: theory, research, critique. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadley, G., Broadley, K., Chapman, J., Jackson, W., Ryan, H., Shepherd, H & Tunmer, B. (2000). What matters to teachers? Let’s listen. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(2), 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilli, G., Wolfe, P. & Smith, M. L. (2006). Meta-analysis and reading policy: Perspectives on teaching children to read. The Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D.J. & Connelly, F.M. (2000). Narrative inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C.E. (2001). Collective sense-making about reading: how teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C.E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C.E. (2005). The role of non-system actors in the relationship between policy and practice: The case of reading instruction in California. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 23–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C.E., Pearson, P.D. & Woulfin, S. (2010, in press). Reading instruction in the era of accountability. In M. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. Moje & P. Afflerbach (eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. I, p. 1–26 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lemos, M. (2002). Closing the gap between research and practice: foundations for the acquisition of literacy. Camberwell, Vic.: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook of qualitative research. (2nd Edn.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Science and Training. (2005)a. Teaching reading: report and recommendations. National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy, December, 2005. Canberra: DEST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Science and Training. (2005)b. Teaching reading: literature review. National Inquiry into the Teaching of Literacy, December, 2005. Canberra: DEST.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressman, M. (1999). On the use of misuse of research evidence: Decoding two states’ reading initiatives. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(3), 258–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley-Marling, C. (2005). The complex relationship between reading research and classroom practice. Research in the Teaching of English, (40) 1, 127–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L.A. (2005) Balancing approaches: revisiting the educational psychology research on teaching students with learning difficulties. Australian Education Review, Canberra: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. (2005). Autonomous literacy or social practice? Constructions of technology literacy. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 5(1), 2–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P (2007). Literacy education in school: Research perspectives from the past, for the future. Accessed 10th March, 2009 from http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/AER52.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P, Maton, K., Martin, J.R. (2008). Talk, text, and knowledge in cumulative, integrated learning: A response to ‘intellectual challenge’. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, (31) 2, 188–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. & Macken-Horarik, M. (2001). Teachers’ voices, teachers’ practices: insider perspectives on literacy education. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(2), 112–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (2006)a. Probing relationships between literacy research, policy development and classroom practice, Proceedings of the Future Directions in Literacy Conference, Sydney: University of Sydney. Accessed March, 2007 from http://www.literacyeducators.com.au/docs/Harris_Paper.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (2006)b. Hearing teachers’ voices and capturing their visions: exploring perspectives of literacies in the early years, Proceedings of the AATE/ALEA Conference, Voices, Visions, Vibes: Hearing the Voices, Feeling the Vibes, Capturing the Visions. Darwin: AATE/ALEA. 8–11 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (2007). Conversations across borders: Interactions between literacy research, policy and practice. Conference Proceedings of Future Directions in Literacy: International Conversations, 3rd-8th September, 2007, pp. 114–134, The University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (2009). Key issues and future directions in the nexus of literacy research, policy and practice. In M. Ryan (ed.), Changing Climates: Education for Sustainable Futures - Australian Association of Research in Education International Conference Proceedings. Brisbane, 30 November - 4 December 2008. Accessed from http://ocs.sfu.ca/aare/index.php/AARE_2008/AARE/paper/view/608/196

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (2010). ‘At a school like this’: Implementing reading policy in a Kindergarten classroom. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 1(1), 50–59. Accessed from http://edu.monash.edu/research/irecejournal/issues.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P, Derewianka, B., Chen, H., Fitzsimmons, P, Kervin. L, Turbill, J., Cruick-shank, K., McKenzie, B. & Konza, D. (2006). An investigation of the relationship between literacy research, policy development and classroom practice. ARC Discovery Grant DP0771675, Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P., McKenzie, B., Chen, H., Kervin, L. & Fitzsimmons, P. (2008). A critical examination of the nexus between literacy research, policy and practice. English in Australia, 43(1), 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, S., Gallego, M.A., Clandinin, D.J., Morell, P., Parkes, P., Ruede, R. & Welch, O. (2007). Editors’ introduction to special issue on ‘No child left behind’, American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 454–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladwig, J. (1996). Academic distinctions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E.O. & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison: Uni of Wisconsin Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2003). Evidence, social science and educational research’, Australian Educational Researcher, 30(2), 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. (2000). Recovering pedagogic discourse: A Bernsteinian approach to the sociology of educational knowledge. Linguistics & Education, 11(1), 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel (2000) Report of the National Reading Panel - Teaching children to read. Accessed 10th March, 2008 from http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/publications/subgroups.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods, (3rd ed), USA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P.D. (2003). The role of professional knowledge in reading reform. Language Arts, 81, 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P.D. (2004). The reading wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 216–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P.D. (2007). An endangered species act for literacy education. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. & Fingaret, L. (2007). What we have learned since the National Reading Panel. Shaping literacy achievement. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (2005). Systemic literacy initiatives: Stories of regulation, conflict and compliance. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(2), 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Catherine. (2000). On the Limits of Reframing: Rereading the National Academy of Sciences Report on Reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(1), 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D.A. (2004). Framing processes, ideology and discursive fields. In D.A. Snow, S.A. Souole & H. Kriesi (Eds). The Blackwell companion to social movements (p. 380–412). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, I. (2008). The Literacy Wars: why teaching children to read and write is a battleground in Australia. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, M. & Miskel, C. G. (2005). Who are the influentials? A cross-state social network analysis of the reading policy domain. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.M., Anderson, R.C., Au, K.H. & Raphael, T.E. (2000). Discretion in the translation of research to policy: A case from beginning reading. Educational Researcher, 29(6), 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turbill, J. (2001). A researcher goes to school: Using technology in the Kindergarten literacy curriculum. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1(3), 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turbill, J. (2006). Invited presentation at Australian Curriculum Studies Association Conference, 8–10 July, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. & Turbill, J.B. (2007). Kinder kids: Learning to read in the 21st century. Paper presented at Critical Capital: Teaching and Learning ALEA/AATE conference, Canberra, 8–11 July 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valli, L. & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an ear of high stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44,(3), 519–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2007). How competency-based training locks the working class out of powerful knowledge: a modified Bernsteinian analysis. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(5), 637–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

2000

  • Lewison, M., Leland, C. & Harste, J. (2000). ‘Not in my classroom!’ The case for using multi-view social issues in books with children. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(1), 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzberg, M. (2000), ‘So we can learn something as well as doing something fun’: learning about reading through Readers’ Theatre. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(1), 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castleton, G. (2000). Adult literacy in Australia: Reading beyond the figures. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(1), 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapp, S.I. (2000), Using email dialogue to generate communication in an English as a Second Language Classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(2), 50–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shopen, G. & Liddicoat, A. (2000). National Assessment: The basis for home-school partnerships. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(1), 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, C. & Green, B. (2000). Literacy and the new technologies in school education: Meeting the l(IT)eracy challenge? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(2), 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt-Smith, C.M. (2000). Exploring the relationship between large scale literacy testing programs and classroom-based assessment: A focus on teachers’ accounts. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(2), 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadley, G., Broadley, K., Chapman, J., Jackson, W., Ryan, H., Shepherd, H. & Tunmer, B. (2000). What matters to teachers? Let’s listen. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(2), 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M. (2000). Text related variables in narrative picture books: Children’s responses to visual and verbal text. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(2), 139–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, R. (2000). Do we allow what we encourage? How students are positioned by teacher feedback. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(2), 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackereth, M. & Anderson, J. (2000). Computers, video games, and literacy: What do girls think? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(3), 184–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, J. (2000). Teaching reading: oral reading practices as a pedagogical tool in the primary school. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(3), 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. & Fletcher, M. (2000). A Queensland perspective on assessment in the early years: teacher perceptions and use of the Reading Development Continuum. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(3), 212–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones Diaz, C., Arthur, L., Beecher, B. & McNaught, M. (2000). Multiple literacies in early childhood: what do families and communities think about their children’s early literacy learning? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 23(3), 230–244.

    Google Scholar 

2001

  • Hill, S. (2001). Questioning text levels. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(1), 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaney, K. (2001). An investigation of teacher preferences for word identification strategies. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(2), 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, K. & Hamston, J. (2001). Out of the mouths of boys: A profile of boys committed to reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, S. (2001). Reading the mismatch: Differing perceptions of boys’ reading practices. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(1), 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W. (2001). Boys and reading: Investigating the impact of masculinities on boys’ reading preferences and involvement in literacy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(1), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, V. (2001). Emergent home literacies: A challenge for educators. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(2), 88–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martello, J. (2001)a. Talk about writing - metalinguistic awareness in beginning writers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(2), 101–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. & Macken-Horarik, M. (2001). Teachers’ voices, teachers’ practices: Insider perspectives on literacy education. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(2), 112–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makin, L. & McNaught, M. (2001). Multiple perspectives on early literacy: Staff and parents speak out. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(2), 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, J. & Cairney, T. (2001). Understanding the discourses of partnership: An examination of one school’s attempts at parent involvement. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(2), 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B. (2001). Critical literacy: Power and pleasure with language in the early years. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(3), 168–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, L. (2001). Young children as critical consumers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(3), 182–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martello, J. (2001)b. Drama: Ways into critical literacy in the early childhood years. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(3), 195–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, C.H. & Harste, J. (2001). That’s not fair! Critical literacy as unlimited semiosis. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24(3), 208–219.

    Google Scholar 

2002

  • Kearsley, I. (2002). Build on the rock: Teacher feedback and reading competence. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(1), 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohl, M. & Milton, M. (2002). What’s happening in schools for primary students with learning difficulties in literacy and numeracy? A national survey. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(1), 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. (2002). Moving towards critical literacies in conversations about the teaching of English. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(1), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (2002). Changing dimensions of school literacies. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(1), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, M. (2002). Using words to explain mathematical ideas. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(1), 78–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B., Badger, L., Barnett, J., Nixon, H. & Pitt, J. (2002). Literacy after the early years: A longitudinal study. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(2), 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammit, K. & Downes, T. (2002). New learning environments and the multiliterate individual: A framework for educators. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(2), 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komesaroff, L. (2002). Applying social critical literacy theory to deaf education. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(2), 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, S. & Simpson, L. (2002). Literacy learning for Indigenous students: Setting a research agenda. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(2), 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, J. (2002). Learning difficulties/disabilities in literacy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(3), 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohl, M. & Rivalland, J. (2002). Literacy learning difficulties in Australian primary schools: Who are the children identified and how do their schools and teachers support them? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(3), 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayetto, A. (2002). All my students are reading the same book and they’re successful: An inclusive teaching approach. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(3), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. & Read, P. (2002). ‘We never knew it was that bad’: Parent-school communication about children’s learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(3), 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greaves, D., Fitzgerald, A-M., Miller, G. & Pillay, B. (2002). Diagnosis and program outcomes for students who learn differently. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(3), 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

2003

  • Ryan, M. & Anstey, M. (2003). Identity and text: Developing self-conscious readers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, B. & Wilson, E. (2003). Multiliteracies in Torres Strait: A Mabuiag Island State School diabetes project. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(1), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, K. (2003). Old technologies and learning to be literate! Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(1), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapitzke, C. (2003). Information literacy: A review and poststructural critique. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(1), 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moni, K., van Kraayenoord, C.E. & Baker, C.D. (2003). An investigation of discourses of literacy assessment in two first year high school English classrooms. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(1), 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt-Smith, C., Castleton, G., Freebody, P & Cooksey, R. (2003). The nature of teacher’s qualitative judgements: a matter of context and salience. Part One: ‘in-context’ judgements. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(2), 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castleton, G., Wyatt-Smith, C., Cooksey, R. & Freebody, P. (2003). The nature of teacher’s qualitative judgements: a matter of context and salience. Part Two: out-of-context’ judgements. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(2), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, G. (2003). The resonance of children: Educating the literacy educator. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(2), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming-Potvin, W., Renshaw, P. & van Kraayenoord, C.E. (2003). Scaffolding and bilingual shared reading experiences: Promoting primary school students’ learning and development. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(2), 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Smith, V. (2003). Using functional grammar to teach academic literacy skills to adults with language-related learning difficulties. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(2), 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, W. (2003). Boys, masculinities and literacy: Addressing the issues. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(3), 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godinho, S. & Shrimpton, B. (2003). Boys’ and girls’ use of linguistic space in small- group discussions: Whose talk dominates? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(3), 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamston, J. & Love, K. (2003). ‘Reading relationships’: Parents, boys and reading as cultural practice. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(3), 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A. (2003). Making literacy policy and practice with a difference. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 26(3), 58–82.

    Google Scholar 

2004

  • Reid, J. & Green, B. (2004). Displacing method(s)?: Historical perspective in the teaching of reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(1), 12–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P., Fitzsimmons, P. & McKenzie, B. (2004). Six words of writing, many layers of significance: An examination of writing as social practice in an early grade classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(1), 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L., Thomas, A. & Bush, R. (2004). The role of images and image-text relations in group ‘Basic Skills Tests’ of literacy for children in the primary school years. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(1), 46–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, E., Henderson, R. Allen, M., Bode, J. & Kocatepe, M. (2004). Repositioning academic literacy: Charting the emergence of a community of practice. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(1), 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. (2004). Literacy learning and children’s social agendas in the school entry classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(2), 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B. (2004). Three little boys and their literacy trajectories. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(2), 114–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J., Edwards, H. & Power, K. (2004). Early literacy education in rural communities: Situating development. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(2), 128–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivalland, J. (2004). Oral language development and access to school discourses. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(2), 142–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. (2004). Privileged literacy in preschool. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(2), 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, S., Lai, M., MacDonald, S. & Farry, S. (2004). Designing more effective teaching of comprehension in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(3), 184–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, T.E., Florio-Ruane, S. & George, M. (2004). Book Club Plus: Organising your Literacy Curriculum to bring students to high levels of literacy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(3), 198–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia, S.W. & Buly, M.R. (2004). Behind test scores: What struggling readers REALLY need. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(3), 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxford, L. (2004). Developing an understanding of the pedagogy of writing in the middle years (age 8–11). Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(3), 234–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. (2004). Developing and understanding of the pedagogy of writing in the middle years (age 8–11). Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27(3), 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

2005

  • Broadley, G. (2005). Seeing forward, looking back: The New Zealand literacy picture. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(1), 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantaleo, S. (2005). Young children engage with the metafictive in picture books. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(1), 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. (2005)a. Young people choose: Adolescents’ text pleasures. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(1), 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roache-Jameson, S. (2005). Kindergarten connections: A study of intertextuality and its links with literacy in the kindergarten classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(1), 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, K. (2005). Deconstructing binary oppositions in literacy discourse and pedagogy. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(1), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehring, H. (2005). Critical, analytical and reflective literacy assessment: Reconstructing practice. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(2), 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (2005)b. Systemic literacy initiatives: Stories of regulation, conflict and compliance. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(2), 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. (2005). Improving literacy outcomes for students in disadvantaged schools: the importance of teacher theory. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(2), 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S. (2005). The proposal of a Stage One reading-groups timetable that integrates major comprehension components. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(2), 138–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kervin, L. (2005). Students talking about home-school communication: Can technology support this process? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(2), 150–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louden, W., Rohl, M., Barratt-Pugh, C., Brown, C., Cairney, T., Elderfield, J., House, H., Meiers, M., Rivalland, J. & Rowe, K. (2005). In Teachers’ Hands: Effective Literacy Teaching Practices in the Early Years of Schooling. Special themed issue. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 28(3), 175–253.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, Australia

    Pauline Harris, Jan Turbill, Lisa Kervin & Kathryn Harden-Thew

Authors
  1. Pauline Harris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Turbill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lisa Kervin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kathryn Harden-Thew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, P., Turbill, J., Kervin, L. et al. Mapping the archive: An Examination of Research Reported in AJLL 2000–2005. AJLL 33, 173–197 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651834

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651834

Search

Navigation