Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing reading comprehension: combining visual and verbal cognitive processes

  • Published:
The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When most children read narrative texts they actively utilise cognitive resources to comprehend by constructing appropriate mental models of story events. However, many children with poor comprehension experience difficulties due to an inability to appropriately direct attention and to effectively use the resources of working memory. As a result, their ability to construct integrated mental models of story content may be impaired. However, their reading comprehension performance can be improved when they are taught inferential reading comprehension strategies involving both verbal and visual processes to facilitate more elaborated mental modeling of narrative texts. This article discusses how such strategies can be implemented and consolidated using a metacognitive focus within a flexible multiple-strategy framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achibald, L.M.D., & Gathercole, S.E. (2007). The complexities of complex memory span: Storage and processing defcits in specifc language impairment. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afferbach, P., Pearson, D., & Paris, S.G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5). 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R.J., Baddeley, A.D., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135(2). 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alloway, T.P., Gathercole, S.E., Willis, C., & Adams, A. (2004). A structural analysis of working memory and related cognitive skills in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(1). 417–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A.D., & Hitch, G. (1994). Developments in the concept of working memory. Neuropsychology, 8, 485–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, M. Li, Z., & Zhang, D. (2007) Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 33(5). 959–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D.V.M. (1997). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorder of language comprehension in children. Hove, UK: Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachowicz, C.L.Z., Fisher, P.J.L., & Ogle, D. (2006). Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4). 524–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, C.C., & Johnson, R.B. (2002). The thinking process approach: Preparing students for the future comprehension challenges. In C. Collins Block, L.B. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Improving comprehension instruction (pp. 385–389). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, C.C., Paris, S.R., Reed, K.L., Whiteley, C.S., & Cleveland, M.D. (2009). Instructional approaches that signify increase reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2). 262–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer-Crane, C., & Snowling, M.J. (2005). Assessing children’s inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H.W., Hogan, T.P., & Fey, M.E. (2003). Subgrouping poor readers on the basis of individual differences in reading-related abilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J.E. (2002). What motivates students to read? Four literacy personalities. The Reading Teacher, 56, 326–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, N. & Morey, C.C. (2006). Visual working memory depends on attentional filtering. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(4). 139–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneman, M., & Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, J.J., Bennetto, L., & Young, E.C. (2006). Story recall and narrative coherence of high-functioning children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(1). 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N.K., & Pearson, P.D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction, (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, D.W. (1996). Helping readers comprehend stories from the characters’ perspectives. The Reading Teacher, 49, 534–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M.J. (1995). Current issues in the neuropsychology of image generation. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1455–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding-Barnsley, R., Hay, I., & Ashman, A. (2005). Phonological awareness: Necessary but not suffcient. Paper presented at the National Conference of the Australian Association of Special Education, Brisbane, September, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambrell, L.B. (2004). Exploring the connection between oral language and early reading. The Reading Teacher, 57, 490–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambrell, L.B., Malloy, J.A., & Mazzoni, S.A. (2007). Evidence-based best practice for comprehensive literacy instruction. In L.B. Gambrell, L.M. Morrow, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best Practices in Literacy Instruction (3rd ed., pp. 11–29). NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambrell, B., Mazzoni, S.A., & Almasi, J.F. (2000). Promoting collaboration, social interaction, and engagement. In L. Baker, M.J. Dreher, & J.T. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (pp. 119–139). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S.E., Alloway, T.P., Willis, C., & Adams, A. (2006). Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 265–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A. M., Brown, M., & Levin, J. R. (2007). Enhancing comprehension in small reading groups using a manipulation strategy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenberg, A.M., & Langston, W.E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffn, T.D., Wiley, J., & Thiede, K.W. (2008). Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 36(1) 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J.T., & Davis, M.H. (2003). Motivating the struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 59–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hareli, S., & Weiner, B. (2002). Social emotions and personality inferences: A scaffold for a new direction in the study of achievement motivation. Educational Psychologist, 37, 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.R., & Pressely, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy instruction. Exceptional Children. 57, 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, A.N., & Rankin-Erikson, J.L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: Using visual images to improve comprehension for the middle school struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 56, 758–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idol, L. (1988). Johnny can’t read: Does the fault lie with the book, the teacher, or Johnny? Remedial and Special Education, l9, 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, V.L., Cain, K., Maric, N. (2007). Comprehension problems in children with specifc language impairment: Does mental imagery training help? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 42(6). 648–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychology Review, 99, 122–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamhi, A., & Catts, H. (2002). The language basis of reading: Implications for classifcation and treatment of children with reading disabilities. In K.G. Butler & E. Silliman (Eds.), Speaking, reading, and writing in children with language learning disabilities: New paradigms in research and practice (pp. 45–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendeou, P., Savage, R., Van den Broek, P. (2009). Revising the simple view of reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1982). Memory for text. In A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Discourse processing (pp. 186–204). NY: North Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J.R., & Savage, J.S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42(2). 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S.M. (1976). Using imagery to retrieve semantic information: A developmental study. Child Development, 47, 434–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leekam, S. (2007). Language comprehension difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorders. In C. Cain and J. Oakhill (Eds.), Children’s Comprehension Problems in Oral and Written Language: A Cognitive Perspective (pp. 104–127). NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S.A., Winograd, P.N., & Bridge, C.A. (1989). The effects of reader and text characteristics on imagery reported during and after reading, Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKeon, M.G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R.G.K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3). 218–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manset-Williamson, G., & Nelson, J.M. (2005). Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, M.B., & Gormley, K. (1982). Children’s recall of familiar and unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B.J.F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J.W., Magimairaj, B.M., & O’Malley, M.H. (2008). Role of working memory in typically developing children’s complex sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7:331–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, L.M. (1985). Retelling stories: A strategy for improving young children’s comprehension, concept of story structure, and oral language complexity. Elementary School Journal, 85, 647–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: Report of the comprehension instruction subgroup to the National Institute of Child Health and Development. Washington, DC: NICD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, J.C., & Adesope, O.O. (2006). Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 76(3). 413–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overett, J., & Donald, D. (1998). Paired reading: effects of a parent involvement program in a disadvantaged community in South Africa. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D.P., & Johnson D.D. (1978). Teaching reading comprehension. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P.D., Roehler, L.R., Dole, J.A., & Duffy, G.G. (1992). Developing expertise in reading comprehension. In S.J. Samuels & A.E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp.101–144). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical Quality to Comprehension. Scientifc Studies of Reading, 11(4). 357–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension instruction: What makes sense now, what might make sense soon. International Reading Association Online Document, Accessed from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/handbook/pressley/index.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M.G. (2006). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Gilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, D.N., Van den Broek, P., McMaster, K.L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C.A. (2007). Higher order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientifc Studies in Reading, 11(4). 289–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renz, K., Lorch, E.P., Milich, R., Lemberger, C., Bodner, A., & Welsh, R. (2003). On-line story representation in boys with attention defcit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(1). 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. L. (2001). Problems in literacy and numeracy. In P. Foreman (Ed.), Integration and Inclusion (pp.167–229). Victoria: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romeo, L. (2002). At-risk students: Learning to break through comprehension barriers. In C. Collins Block, L.B. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Improving comprehension instruction (pp. 385–389). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roser, N., Martinez, M., Fuhrken, C., & McDonnold, K. (2007). Characters as guides to meaning. The Reading Teacher, 60(6). 548–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., & Quast, Z. (1990). Reader response and long-term recall for journalistic text: The roles of imagery, affect, and importance. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 256–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoski, M., & Willson, V.L. (2006). Effects of a theoretically based large-scale reading intervention in a multicultural urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 137–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, R., Lavers, N. & Pillay, V. (2007). Working memory and reading difficulties: What we know and what we don’t know about the relationship. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 185–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp. Retrieved December 12, 2002, from http://www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1465/

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M., & Firth, U. (1997). Comprehesion in hyperlexic readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 392–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stull, A., Mayer, R.E. (2007). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organisers. Journal of Educational Psychology. 99(4). 808–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H.L., Howard, C.B., & Saez, L. (2006). Do different components of working memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3). 252–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, H.L., & Jerman, O. (2007). The infuence of working memory on reading growth in subgroups of children with reading difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 249–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taboada, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (2006). Contributions of student questioning and prior knowledge to construction of knowledge from reading information text. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1). 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabasso, T., & Sperry, L.L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Boxtel, C., Van der linden, J., Roelofs, E., & Erkens, G. (2002). Collaborative concept mapping: Provoking and supporting meaningful discourse. Theory Into Practice, 41(1). 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Schoot, M., Vasbinder, A.L., Horsley, T.M., Reijntjes, A., & Van Lieshout, E.C.D.M. (2009). Lexical ambiguity resolution in good and poor comprehenders: An eye fxation and self-paced reading study in primary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1). 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Meter, P., Aleksic, M., Schwartz, A., & Garner, J. (2006). Learner-generated drawing as a strategy for learning from content area text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 142–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, E.K., McCollough, A.W., & Machizawa, M.G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S.E., Buxton, W.M., & Kelly, M. (1999). Using think-alouds to examine reader text interest. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 194–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, J.F. (1981a). Readers’ expectation for story structures. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 90–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, J.F. (1981b). Story grammars and reading instruction. Reading Teacher, 34, 762–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G.L., & Lonigan, C.J. (1988). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, G.E. (2007). A comprehension intervention for children with reading comprehension difficulties. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 12(1). 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, G.E. (2006). Comprehension difficulties after year 4: Actioning appropriately. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 11(3). 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, G.E., & Hay, I. (2004). Using imagery as a strategy to enhance students’ comprehension of read text. In B.A. Knight & W. Scott (Eds.), Learning difficulties: Multiple perspectives (pp. 85–101). Frenchs Forest. NSW: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children’s problems in text comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., & Hoosain, R. (2001). The infuence of narrative text characteristics on thematic inference during reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 24, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Griffith University, Australia

    Gary Woolley

Authors
  1. Gary Woolley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woolley, G. Developing reading comprehension: combining visual and verbal cognitive processes. AJLL 33, 108–125 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651827

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651827

Search

Navigation