Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In defence of ambiguity

  • Published:
Monash Bioethics Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Endnotes

  1. Marlowe C. The Tragical History of Dr Faustus, 1604, Scene 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith R, ‘In search of “non-disease”’, British Medical Journal, vol. 324, 2002, pp. 883–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saracci R, ‘The world health organisation needs to reconsider its definition of health’, British Medical Journal, vol. 314, 1997, pp. 1409–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, ‘Changing disease definitions: implications for disease prevalence analysis of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994’, Effective Clinical Practice, vol. 2, no. 2, 1999, pp. 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Misselbrook D, Thinking About Patients, Newbury: Petroc Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heath I, ‘Uncertain clarity: contradiction, meaning and hope’,. British Journal of General Practice, vol. 49, 1999, pp. 651–657.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kentish Town, London

    Iona Heath (General Practitioner)

Authors
  1. Iona Heath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heath, I. In defence of ambiguity. Monash Bioethics Review 25, 26–27 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03549811

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03549811

Search

Navigation