Abstract
Wetlands are increasingly scarce and the construction of water-flow regulation structures is predicted to increase in the coming years. The correct management of these impacted areas may play an important role in the conservation of wetland bird species. In a floodplain whose natural flood pulse was reversed in relation to local rainfall seasonality by the construction of a dam (the Tanquã floodplain), we investigated how the composition and abundance of the waterbird community varied with the water depth to understand how artificially maintained flooded areas could sustain different bird functional groups, preventing future biodiversity losses. We recorded 72 waterbird species, 17 reproducing in the area. Seventeen species are short-distance migrants in Brazil, while eight are long-distance migrants. As overall bird abundances are negatively correlated with the water depth, any further modification in the flood-pulse may cause the area to lose its ability to support its biodiversity. Future dam construction projects should take actions to transform or maintain their areas of influence as important habitats for the threatened waterbird community, thus contributing to their conservation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Acosta M., Mugica L., Blanco D., Lopez-Lanus B., Dias R.A., Doodnath L.W. & Hurtado J. 2010. Birds of rice fields in the Americas. Waterbirds. 33: 105–122.
Amezaga J.M., Santamaria L. & Green A.J. 2002. Biotic wetland connectivity-supporting a new approach for wetland policy. Acta Oecologica. 23: 213–222.
Antas P.T.Z. 1994. Migration and other movements among the lower Parana River Valley wetlands, Argentina, and the south Brazil/ Pantanal wetlands. Bird Conservation International. 4: 181–190.
Baschuk M.S., Koper N., Wrubleski D.A. & Goldsborough G. 2012. Effects of water depth, cover and food resources on habitat use of marsh birds and waterfowl in boreal wetlands of Manitoba, Canada. Waterbirds. 35: 44–55.
Casanoves F., Pla L., Di Rienzo J.A. & Diaz S. 2011. FDiversity: a software package for the integrated analysis of functional diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2: 233–237.
Crozariol M.A. 2010. Birdwatching em campos de arroz irrigados: uma atividade que tem tudo para dar certo! Atualidades Ornitologicas 157: 47–54.
Davison N.C. & Evans P.R. 1988. Prebreeding accumulation of fat and muscle protein by Arctic-breeding shorebirds, p. 342–352. In: Acta XIX Congressus International Ornithologici. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Desgranges J.-L., Ingram J., Drolet B., Morin J., Savage C. & Borcard D. 2006. Modelling wetland bird response to water level changes in the Lake Ontario - St. Lawrence River hydrosystem. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 113: 329–365.
Dunning-Jr. J.B. 1992. CRC handbook of avian body masses. Boca Raton: CRC Pess.
Faria C.M.A., Rodrigues M., Amaral F.Q., Modena É. & Fernandes A.M. 2006. Aves de um fragmento de Mata Atlãntica no alto Rio Doce, Minas Gerais: colonização e extinção. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23: 1217–1230.
Gardner R.C., Barchiesi S., Beltrame C., Finlayson C.M., Galewski T., Harrison I., Paganini M., Perennou C., Pritchard D.E., Rosenqvist A. & Walpole M. 2015. State of the world’s wetlands and their services to people: a compilation of recent analyses. Ramsar Briefing Not. 7. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
Hammer O., Harper D.A.T. & Ryan P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1–9.
Hvenegaard G.T. & Barbieri E. 2010. Shorebirds in the state of Sergipe, northeast Brazil: potential tourism impacts. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 18: 169–175.
IHA. 2015. 2015 Hydropower Status Report. International Hydropower Association. https://www.hydropower.org/2015-hydropower-status-report (access on 11 August 2016).
Kirby J.S., Stattersfield A.J., Butchart S.H.M., Evans M.I., Grimmett R.F.A., Jones V.R., O’Sullivan J., Tucker G.M. & Newton I. 2008. Key conservation issues for migratory land- and waterbird species on the world’s major flyways. Bird Conservation International 18: S18–S49.
Lantz S.M., Gawlik D.E. & Cook M.I. 2010. The effects of water depth and submerged aquatic vegetation on foraging habitat selection and foraging success of wading birds. Condor. 112: 460–469.
Lantz S.M., Gawlik D.E. & Cook M.I. 2011. The effects of water depth and emergent vegetation on foraging success and habitat selection of wading birds in the Everglades. Waterbirds 34: 439–447.
Ma Z., Cai Y., Li B. & Chen J. 2010. Managing wetland habitats for waterbirds: an international perspective. Wetlands 30: 15–27.
Ma Z., Li B., Zhao B., Jing K., Tang S. & Chen J. 2004. Are artificial wetlands good alternatives to natural wetlands for waterbirds? - a case study on Chongming Island, China. Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 333–350.
Macedo-Soares P.H.M., Petry A.C., Farjalla V.F. & Caramaschi E.P. Hydrological connectivity in coastal inland systems: lessons from a Neotropical fish metacommunity. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 19: 7-18.
Mehlman D.W., Mabey S.E., Ewert D.N., Duncan C., Abel B., Cimprich D., Sutter R.D. & Woodrey M. 2005. Conserving stopover sites for forest-dwelling migratory landbirds. Auk 122: 1281–1290.
Moreira-Lima L. 2013. Aves da Mata Atlãntica: riqueza, composição, status, endemismos e conservação. MSc. Dissertation. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.
Novelli R. 1997. Aves marinhas costeiras do Brasil (identificação e biologia). Porto Alegre: Cinco Continentes.
Ntiamoa-Baidu Y., Piersma T., Wiersma P., Poot M., Battley P. & Gordon C. 1998. Water depth selection, daily feeding routines and diets of waterbirds in coastal lagoons in Ghana. Ibis 140: 89–103.
Padial A.A., Carvalho P., Thomaz S.M., Boschilia S.M., Rodrigues R.B. & Kobayashi J.T. 2009. The role of an extreme flood disturbance on macrophyte assemblages in a Neotropical floodplain. Aquatic Sciences 71: 389–398.
Paillisson J.M., Reeber S. & Marion L. 2002. Bird assemblages as bioindicators of water regime management and hunting disturbance in natural wet grasslands. Biological Conservation 106: 115–127.
Paracuellos M. & Telleria J.L. 2004. Factors affecting the distribution of a waterbird community: the role of habitat configuration and bird abundance. Waterbirds 27: 446–453.
Paszkowski C.A. & Tonn W.M. 2000. Community concordance between the fish and aquatic birds of lakes in northern Alberta, Canada: the relative importance of environmental and biotic factors. Freshwater Biology 43: 421–437.
Petesse M.L., Petrere-Jr. M. & Spigolon R.J. 2007. The hydraulic management of the Barra Bonita reservoir (SP, Brazil) as a factor influencing the temporal succession of its fish community. Brazilian Journal of Biology 67: 433–445.
Piacentini V.Q., Aleixo A., Agne C.E., Mauricio G.N., Pacheco J.F., Bravo G.A., Brito G.R.R., Naka L.N., Olmos F., Posso S., Silveira L.F., Betini G.S., Carrano E., Franz I., Lees A.C., Lima L.M., Pioli D., Schunck F., Amaral F.R., Bencke G.A., Cohn-Haft M., Figueiredo L.F.A., Straube F.C. & Cesari E. 2015. Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee. Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia 23: 91–298.
Rodrigues M. & Michelin V.B. 2005. Riqueza e diversidade de aves aquaticas de uma lagoa natural no sudeste do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22: 928–935.
Rosenzweig M.L. 2003. Win-win ecology: how the Earth’s species can survive in the midst of human enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
São Paulo. 2014. Decreto No. 60133. 07 Februar. 2014. Declara as espécies da fauna silvestre ameaçadas de extinção, as quase ameaçadas e as deficientes de dados para avaliação no Estado de São Paulo e da providências correlatas. Diario Oficial Poder Executivo 124: 27–32.
Schleuter D., Daufresne M., Massol F. & Argillier C. 2010. A user’s guide to functional diversity indices. Ecological Monographs 80: 469–484.
Schunck F., Melo M.A., Sanches L.A., Godoy F.I., Martins G.G. & Mix P. 2016. Avifauna do Parque Ecologico do Guarapiranga e sua importãncia para a conservação das aves da Região Metropolitana de São Paulo. Ornithologia 9: 35–57.
Schunck F. & Rodrigues K.E. 2016. Avifauna do Parque Estadual da Várzea do Rio Embu-Guaçu e sua importância para a conservação das aves de várzea da porção sudoeste da Região Metropolitana de São Paulo. Ornithologia 9: 58–79.
Sebastián-González E. & Green A.J. 2016. Reduction of avian diversity in created versus natural and restored wetlands. Ecography 39: 1176–1184.
Sick H. & Barruel P. 1984. Ornitologia brasileira, v. 1. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília.
Sigrist T. 2009. The Avis Brasilis field guide to the birds of Brazil: species accounts. São Paulo: Avibrasilis.
Tavares D.C., Guadagnin D.L., Moura J.F., Siciliano S. & Merico A. 2015. Environmental and anthropogenic factors structuring waterbird habitats of tropical coastal lagoons: implications for management. Biological Conservation 186: 12–21.
Tavares D.C. & Siciliano S. 2014. The bird community in a threatened coastal lagoon in southeastern Brazil. Open Journal of Ecology 4: 98–112.
Valente R.M., Silva J.M.C., Straube F.C. & Nascimento J.L.X. (eds.). 2011. Conservação de aves migratórias Neárticas no Brasil. Belém: Conservação Internacional.
Zarfl C., Lumsdon A.E., Berlekamp J., Tydecks L. & Tockner K. 2015. A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquatic Sciences 77: 161–170.
Zuur A.F., Ieno E.N., Walker N.J., Saveliev A.A. & Smith G.M. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Robinson, V., Pizo, M.A. A floodplain with artificially reversed flood pulse is important for migratory and rare bird species. Rev. Bras. Ornitol. 25, 155–168 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544394
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03544394