Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Oat Kernel Size and Size Distributions on Test Weight

  • Published:
Cereal Research Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Test weight is one of the most important characteristics for evaluating grain quality in oats. This study evaluated the role of oat kernel size and size distributions on test weight. Oat kernel size was measured from digital image analysis, sequential sieving and mean kernel mass of original oat samples and their different size fractions. Data from ten genotypes and eight environments indicated that smaller sized kernel fractions derived by sieving had higher bulk density than those from the larger sized kernel fraction. The smaller kernels also had greater groat percentages, indicating greater kernel density in smaller size fractions. To investigate a possible packing effect of different kernel sizes on test weight, the summation of volumes of size fractions was compared with the volume of the original sample. Our results indicated no significant differences between the volumes of the original sample and the sum of the volumes of their size fractions. This indicated that oats of uniform size packed just as efficiently as a mixture of different size kernels. A similar experiment evaluating bulk densities of the different size fractions reached the same conclusion. These results indicate that the test weight drops observed in seed cleaning, where the smaller kernels are removed, are due to the removal of the most dense kernels in the sample, and not to a packing effect, where smaller kernels might fill in spaces between larger kernels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins, R. E. 1943. Factors affecting milling quality in oats. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 35:532–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbee, O. E. 1935. Markton and other varieties of oats. Bull. Wash. St. Coll. Exp. Stn. 314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, B. G., and M. G. Weiss. 1951. Evaluation of physical factors affecting quality of oat varieties from Bond parentage. Agron. J. 43:22–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, G., C. Nernst, M. Rohrlich, and E. Timm. 1956. Technologische und chemische Eigenschaften von Hafersorten. Jahrb. Versuch. Getreid. Berlin 1954–1956:19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, G. H. 1940. Effect of “clipping” or rubbing of the oat grain on the weight and viability of the seed. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 32:167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deane, D., and E. Commers. 1986. Oat cleaning and Processing, p. 371–412. In F.H. Webster (ed.) Oats: Chemistry and Technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doehlert, D.C., and M.S. McMullen. 2002. Sources of variation in kernel size in oats. Cereal Chem. 79:528–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doehlert, D.C., and M.S. McMullen. 2001. Optimizing conditions for experimental oat dehulling. Cereal Chem. 78:675–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doehlert, D.C., M.S. McMullen, and R.R. Baumann. 1999. Factors affecting groat percentage in oat. Crop Sci. 39:1858–1865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsberg, R. A., and D. L. Reeves. 1992. Breeding oat cultivars for improved grain quality. In Oat Science and Technology, eds. H. G. Marshall and M. E. Sorrells, 751–775, Madison: American Society of Agronomy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig, R. B., and W. M. Findlay. 1907. The milling properties of oats. J. Bd. Agric. London 14:257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachmann, W. 1947. Hafermullerei: Grössensortierung vor dem Schöllen. Getreide Mehl Brot 1:7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. A., and J. Livezey. 1987. The U.S. Oats Industry. Agricultural Economic Report, Number 573, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubner, R. 1951. Vierjahrige Untersuchungen uber Kornqualitat und Leistungeschaften des Hafers. I Morphologisch-physikalische Untersuchngen. Z. Acker Pflanzenbau 93:44–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. B., N. L. Kent, and H. F. Martin. 1952. The kernel content of oats. Variation in percentage kernel content and 1,000 kernel weight within the variety. J. Nat. Inst. Agric. Bot. 6:149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, H. 1955. Quality in oats and oat products from the oatmeal and provender miller’s point of view. J. Nat. Inst. Agric. Bot. 7:404–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, H. H. 1914. Oats for New York. Bull. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. 343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otsu, N. 1979. A threshold selection method for gray level histogram. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-9: p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peek, J.M., and L.M. Poehlman. 1949. Grain size and hull percentage as factors in the milling quality of oats. Agron. J. 41:462–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, Y., G. D. Davis, J. L. Stoops, and F. S. Lai. 1979. Test weight and groat-to-hill ratio in oats. Cereal Foods World 24:600–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie, and D.A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biomedical Approach. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoa, T. E. 1922. Varietal trials with oats in North Dakota. Bull. N. Dak. Agric. Exp. Stn. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoa, T. E., R. W. Smith, and C. M. Swallers. 1936. Oats in North Dakota. Bull. N. Dak. Agric. Exp. Stn. 287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sword, J. 1949. Milling values of oat varieties I. 1946 results. Scot. Agric. 28:137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, S.J., and R.G. Fulcher. 1988. Determination of variation in oat kernel morphology by digital image analysis. J. Cereal Sci. 7:219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavitz, C. A. 1927. Forty years’ experiments with grain crops. Bull. Ont. Dep. Agric. 332.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas C. Doehlert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doehlert, D.C., McMullen, M.S., Jannink, JL. et al. Influence of Oat Kernel Size and Size Distributions on Test Weight. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 32, 135–142 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543291

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543291

Key Words

Navigation