Summary
Test weight is one of the most important characteristics for evaluating grain quality in oats. This study evaluated the role of oat kernel size and size distributions on test weight. Oat kernel size was measured from digital image analysis, sequential sieving and mean kernel mass of original oat samples and their different size fractions. Data from ten genotypes and eight environments indicated that smaller sized kernel fractions derived by sieving had higher bulk density than those from the larger sized kernel fraction. The smaller kernels also had greater groat percentages, indicating greater kernel density in smaller size fractions. To investigate a possible packing effect of different kernel sizes on test weight, the summation of volumes of size fractions was compared with the volume of the original sample. Our results indicated no significant differences between the volumes of the original sample and the sum of the volumes of their size fractions. This indicated that oats of uniform size packed just as efficiently as a mixture of different size kernels. A similar experiment evaluating bulk densities of the different size fractions reached the same conclusion. These results indicate that the test weight drops observed in seed cleaning, where the smaller kernels are removed, are due to the removal of the most dense kernels in the sample, and not to a packing effect, where smaller kernels might fill in spaces between larger kernels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkins, R. E. 1943. Factors affecting milling quality in oats. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 35:532–539.
Barbee, O. E. 1935. Markton and other varieties of oats. Bull. Wash. St. Coll. Exp. Stn. 314.
Bartley, B. G., and M. G. Weiss. 1951. Evaluation of physical factors affecting quality of oat varieties from Bond parentage. Agron. J. 43:22–25.
Bruckner, G., C. Nernst, M. Rohrlich, and E. Timm. 1956. Technologische und chemische Eigenschaften von Hafersorten. Jahrb. Versuch. Getreid. Berlin 1954–1956:19–38.
Cutler, G. H. 1940. Effect of “clipping” or rubbing of the oat grain on the weight and viability of the seed. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 32:167–175.
Deane, D., and E. Commers. 1986. Oat cleaning and Processing, p. 371–412. In F.H. Webster (ed.) Oats: Chemistry and Technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN.
Doehlert, D.C., and M.S. McMullen. 2002. Sources of variation in kernel size in oats. Cereal Chem. 79:528–534.
Doehlert, D.C., and M.S. McMullen. 2001. Optimizing conditions for experimental oat dehulling. Cereal Chem. 78:675–679
Doehlert, D.C., M.S. McMullen, and R.R. Baumann. 1999. Factors affecting groat percentage in oat. Crop Sci. 39:1858–1865.
Forsberg, R. A., and D. L. Reeves. 1992. Breeding oat cultivars for improved grain quality. In Oat Science and Technology, eds. H. G. Marshall and M. E. Sorrells, 751–775, Madison: American Society of Agronomy.
Greig, R. B., and W. M. Findlay. 1907. The milling properties of oats. J. Bd. Agric. London 14:257–268.
Hachmann, W. 1947. Hafermullerei: Grössensortierung vor dem Schöllen. Getreide Mehl Brot 1:7–9.
Hoffman, L. A., and J. Livezey. 1987. The U.S. Oats Industry. Agricultural Economic Report, Number 573, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
Hubner, R. 1951. Vierjahrige Untersuchungen uber Kornqualitat und Leistungeschaften des Hafers. I Morphologisch-physikalische Untersuchngen. Z. Acker Pflanzenbau 93:44–78.
Hutchinson, J. B., N. L. Kent, and H. F. Martin. 1952. The kernel content of oats. Variation in percentage kernel content and 1,000 kernel weight within the variety. J. Nat. Inst. Agric. Bot. 6:149–160.
Lea, H. 1955. Quality in oats and oat products from the oatmeal and provender miller’s point of view. J. Nat. Inst. Agric. Bot. 7:404–410.
Love, H. H. 1914. Oats for New York. Bull. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. 343.
Otsu, N. 1979. A threshold selection method for gray level histogram. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-9: p.
Peek, J.M., and L.M. Poehlman. 1949. Grain size and hull percentage as factors in the milling quality of oats. Agron. J. 41:462–466.
Pomeranz, Y., G. D. Davis, J. L. Stoops, and F. S. Lai. 1979. Test weight and groat-to-hill ratio in oats. Cereal Foods World 24:600–602.
Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie, and D.A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biomedical Approach. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Stoa, T. E. 1922. Varietal trials with oats in North Dakota. Bull. N. Dak. Agric. Exp. Stn. 164.
Stoa, T. E., R. W. Smith, and C. M. Swallers. 1936. Oats in North Dakota. Bull. N. Dak. Agric. Exp. Stn. 287.
Sword, J. 1949. Milling values of oat varieties I. 1946 results. Scot. Agric. 28:137–148.
Symons, S.J., and R.G. Fulcher. 1988. Determination of variation in oat kernel morphology by digital image analysis. J. Cereal Sci. 7:219–228.
Zavitz, C. A. 1927. Forty years’ experiments with grain crops. Bull. Ont. Dep. Agric. 332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doehlert, D.C., McMullen, M.S., Jannink, JL. et al. Influence of Oat Kernel Size and Size Distributions on Test Weight. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 32, 135–142 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543291
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03543291