Abstract
Objectives
To coordinate local responsibilities and identify options to enhance local health system capacity during a pandemic. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the application of a Delphi exercise in an Ontario Public Health Unit as a first step in this complex planning task. Its strengths and weaknesses are presented.
Participants
Stakeholders representing nine categories of health care organizations.
Setting
Public Health facilitated the Delphi process.
Intervention
The exercise occurred in three rounds. In round 1, stakeholders identified a series of questions pertaining to the subject. Round 2 involved formulation of issue-related statements outlining possible strategies or solutions. Level of agreement regarding the statements by panel members were indicated. In round 3, a facilitated face-to-face meeting allowed statements to be fed back to the panel, enabling discussion of their own and other panel members’ previous statement views.
Outcomes
Statements were formulated from questions generated by the expert panel, collated into categories and sent to all panel members. A total of 72 unique statements were developed. Agreement was obtained for 56 of the statements.
Conclusion
The Delphi exercise proved to be an effective approach to commence planning a coordinated local health system response to a pandemic. This process permitted advancement of the planning exercise to Phase 2 which aimed to develop operational plans for primary assessment centres, alternate care sites and hospital surge capacity.
Résumé
Objectifs
Coordonner les responsabilités locales et répertorier les moyens possibles d’améliorer la capacité des systèmes de santé locaux lors d’une pandémie. Nous avons voulu illustrer l’application de la technique Delphi dans un bureau de santé publique de l’Ontario comme première étape de cette tâche de planification complexe. Nous présentons les forces et les faiblesses de la technique.
Participants
Des représentants de neuf catégories d’organismes de soins de santé.
Lieu
Un bureau de santé publique dont le personnel a animé l’exercice Delphi.
Intervention
L’exercice s’est déroulé en trois cycles. Pendant le cycle 1, les parties prenantes ont défini une série de questions sur le sujet. Pendant le cycle 2, on a formulé des énoncés liés aux enjeux pour ébaucher des stratégies ou des solutions possibles, en précisant le niveau d’accord des participants à l’égard de ces énoncés. Pendant le cycle 3, lors d’une réunion en personne animée par le bureau de santé publique, les énoncés ont été présentés de nouveau aux experts pour qu’ils en discutent ensemble.
Résultats
Les énoncés ont été formulés à partir des questions produites par le groupe d’experts, puis triés en catégories et envoyés aux experts. Sur les 72 énoncés élaborés, 56 ont été acceptés.
Conclusion
L’exercice Delphi s’est avéré un moyen efficace de commencer à planifier la riposte coordonnée d’un système de santé local dans l’éventualité d’une pandémie. Il a permis de faire progresser la planification jusqu’à la phase 2: l’élaboration de plans opérationnels pour les centres d’évaluation primaires, les autres centres de soins et les hôpitaux aux prises avec des hausses soudaines de patients.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Pandemic Influenza Committee. The Canadian Pandemic Influenza for the Health Sector. Ottawa, ON: Public Health Agency of Canada, 2006.
Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Ontario Health Plan for an Influenza Pandemic 2007. Toronto, ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2007.
Statistics Canada. 2002. Population and dwelling counts, for Canada, provinces and territories, census divisions, and census subdivisions (municipalities), 2006 and 2001 censuses — 100% data. Available online at: https://doi.org/www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/popdwell/Table.cfm?T=304&SR=41&S=1&O=A&RPP=10&PR=35&CMA=0 (Accessed October 31, 2007).
Linstone HA, Turoff M. Introduction to the Delphi method: Techniques and applications. In: Linstone HA, Turoff M (Eds.), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1975;3–12.
Powell C. The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. J Adv Nurs 2002;41(4):376–82.
Randic L, Carley S, Mackway-Jones K, Dunn K. Planning for major burns in the UK using an accelerated Delphi technique. Burns 2002;28(5):405–12.
Crawford IWF, Mackway-Jones K, Russell DR, Carley SD. Planning for chemical incidents by implementing a Delphi based consensus study. Emerg Med J 2004;21:20–23.
Brown N, Crawford I, Carley S, Mackway-Jones K. A Delphi-based consensus study into planning for biological incidents. J Public Health 2006;28(3):238–41.
Hassan TB, Barnett DC. Delphi type methodology to develop consensus on the future design for EMS systems in the United Kingdom. Emerg Med J 2002;(19):155–59.
Mullen PM. Delphi: Myths and reality. J Health Organization and Management 2003;17(1):37–52.
Goodman CM. The Delphi technique: A critique. J Adv Nurs 1987;12:729–34.
Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Studies 2001;38:195–200.
Kennedy HP. Enhancing Delphi research: Methods and results. J Adv Nurs 2004;45(5):504–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stalker, S.A., Weir, E., Vessel, S.L. et al. Planning a Coordinated Local Health Care System Response to a Pandemic Using an Accelerated Delphi Technique: Phase 1. Can J Public Health 100, 65–69 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405496
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405496