Skip to main content
Log in

Non-medical Use of Prescription Opioids and Public Health in Canada

Urgent Call for Research and Interventions Development

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While the public health problem of psychoactive drug use is well recognized, the emerging phenomenon of non-medical use of prescription opioids has been largely ignored in Canada. Most evidence on this issue and related harms in North America to date come from the United States (US), where the prevalence of non-medical opioid use in key populations, as well as related morbidity and mortality, recently have risen substantially. Also, given the increases in the overall consumption of prescription opioids similar to those in the US, a substantial expansion of problems related to non-medical opioid use appears to be occurring in Canada. For example, recent major increases in the use of prescription opioids — rather than heroin — are documented for street drug users in Canadian cities. However, a comprehensive assessment of the problem of non-medical prescription opioid use is hindered by the spotty — or absent — nature of crucial indicators and data. We urge that the necessary efforts and resources for systematic assessment of the evolving phenomenon of non-medical opioid use and its key facets be established in Canada, and that policy-makers implement sensible intervention strategies targeting this problem within a public health framework, specifically avoiding unintended negative consequences (e.g., undermining access to pain treatment).

Résumé

Le problème de santé publique que représente la consommation de substances psychotropes est bien connu, mais le phénomène nouveau de la consommation d’opioïdes d’ordonnance à des fins non médicales est largement négligé au Canada. Jusqu’à maintenant, la plupart des données probantes sur ce phénomène et les méfaits qu’il cause en Amérique du Nord viennent des États-Unis, où la prévalence de la consommation d’opioïdes à des fins non médicales dans certaines populations, ainsi que la morbidité et la mortalité connexes, ont beaucoup augmenté récemment. Or, on semble assister à une forte progression des problèmes liés à la consommation d’opioïdes à des fins non médicales au Canada en raison des hausses de la consommation globale d’opioïdes d’ordonnance, hausses qui sont semblables à celles des É.-U. Par exemple, de fortes hausses dans la consommation d’opioïdes d’ordonnance — plutôt que d’héroïne — ont été documentées récemment chez les utilisateurs de drogue dans les villes canadiennes. Cependant, l’évaluation approfondie du problème de la consommation d’opioïdes d’ordonnance à des fins non médicales est entravée par la rareté (ou l’absence) de données et d’indicateurs cruciaux. Nous encourageons vivement le Canada à prendre les mesures et à engager les ressources nécessaires à l’évaluation systématique du phénomène nouveau de la consommation d’opioïdes à des fins non médicales et de ses principales facettes, et nous exhortons les décideurs à mettre en œuvre des stratégies d’intervention raisonnables qui ciblent ce problème dans un contexte de santé publique, en évitant spécifiquement les conséquences non désirées (comme la restriction de l’accès au traitement de la douleur).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rehm J, Baliunas D, Brochu S, Fischer B, Gnam W, Patra J, et al. The costs of substance abuse in Canada 2002. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse (CCSA), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Narcotics Control Board (INCB). Annual Report: Press Release No. 4. Vienna, Switzerland: INCB, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Compton W, Volkow N. Major increases in opi-oid analgesic abuse in the United States: Concerns and strategies. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006;81(2):103–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sung HE, Richter L, Vaughan R, Johnson PB, Thom B. Nonmedical use of prescription opioids among teenagers in the United States: Trends and correlates. J Adolesc Health 2005;37(1):44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Institutes of Health. Effective medical treatment of opiate addiction. National Consensus Development Panel on Effective Medical Treatment of Opiate Addiction. JAMA 1998;283(22):2931–32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCabe SE, West B, Wechsler H. Trends and college-level characteristics associated with the non-medical use of prescription drugs among US college students from 1993 to 1997. Addiction 2007;102:455–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilson A, Ryan K, Jonsson D, Dahl J. A reassessment of trends in the medical use and abuse of opioid analgesics and implications for diversion control. J Pain Symptom Manage 2004;28(2):176–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paulozzi L, Budnitz D, Xi Y. Increasing deaths from opioid analgesics in the United States. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006;15(9):618–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Birnbaum H, White A, Reynolds J, Greenberg P, Zhang M, Vallow S, et al. Estimated costs of prescription opioid analgesic abuse in the United States in 2001: A societal perspective. Clin J Pain 2006;22(8):667–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jovey R, Ennis J, Gardner-Nix J, Goldman B, Hay H, Lynch M, et al. Use of opioid analgesics for the treatment of chronic noncancer pain: A consensus statement and guidelines from the Canadian Pain Society, 2002. Pain Res Manag 2003;8(Suppl A):3A–14A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lanser P, Gesell S. Pain management: The fifth vital sign. Health Benchmarks 2001;8:68–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. International Narcotics Control Board. Narcotic Drugs: Estimated world requirements for 2007; Statistics for 2005. New York, NY: INCB, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fischer B, Rehm J, Patra J, Firestone Cruz M. Changes in illicit opioid use profiles across Canada. CMAJ 2006;175(11):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brands B, Blake J, Sproule B, Gourlay D, Busto U. Prescription opioid abuse in patients presenting for methadone maintenance treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004;73(2):199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. CBC: The Fifth Estate. Hillbilly Heroin. Available online at: https://doi.org/www.cbc.ca/fifth/main_hillbillyheroin html (Accessed September 25, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martin TL, Woodall KL, McLellan B. Fentanyl-related deaths in Ontario, Canada: Toxicological findings and circumstances of death in 112 cases (2002-2004). J Anal Toxicol 2007;30(8):603–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Adlaf E, Begin P, Sawka E. Canadian Addiction Survey (CAS): A national survey of Canadians’ use of alcohol and other drugs: Prevalence of use and related harms — a detailed report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Inciardi J, Surratt HL, Kurtz S, Cicero TJ. Mechanisms of prescription drug diversion among drug-involved club- and street-based populations. Pain Med 2007;8(2):171–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hurwitz W. The challenge of prescription drug misuse: A review and commentary. Pain Med 2005;6(5):152–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boyd C, McCabe SE, Teter CJ. Medical and nonmedical use of prescription pain medication by youth in a Detroit-area public school district. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007;81:37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McCabe SE, Boyd CJ. Sources of prescription drugs for illicit use. Addict Behav 2005;30(7):1342–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Joranson DE, Gilson A. Wanted: A public health approach to prescription opioid abuse and diversion. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2006;15:632–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zacny J, Bigelow G, Compton P, Foley K, Iguchi M, Sannerud C. College on Problems of Drug Dependence taskforce on prescription opioid non-medical use and abuse: Position statement. Drug Alcohol Depend 2003;69(3):215–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fishman SM, Papazian JS, Gonzalez S, Riches PS, Gilson A. Regulating opioid prescribing through prescription monitoring programs: Balancing drug diversion and treatment of pain. Pain Med 2004;5(3):309–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cowan DT, Allan LG, Libretto SE, Griffiths P. Opioid drugs: A comparative survey of therapeutic and “street” use. Pain Med 2001;2(3):193–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Joranson DE, Gilson A. A much-needed window on opioid diversion. Pain Med 2007;8(2):128–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldman B. The news on the street: Prescription drugs on the black market. CMAJ 1998;159(2):149–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt C. Experts worry about chilling effect of federal regulations on treating pain. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:554–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Burgess F. Pain treatment, drug diversion, and the casualties of war. Pain Med 2006;7(6):474–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedikt Fischer PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, B., Goldman, B., Rehm, J. et al. Non-medical Use of Prescription Opioids and Public Health in Canada. Can J Public Health 99, 182–184 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405469

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03405469

Key words

Mots clés

Navigation