Skip to main content
Log in

Large Debris Removal Mission in LEO based on Hybrid Propulsion

  • Published:
Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last 40 years, the mass of orbiting objects increased at the rate of about 145 metric tons annually, leading to a total of approximately 7000 metric tons. Most of the cross-sectional area and mass (97% in low Earth orbit, LEO) is concentrated in about 4500 intact objects, i.e. abandoned spacecraft and rocket bodies, plus a further 1000 operational spacecrafts. Numerical simulations show that the most effective way to prevent an exponential growth of the cataloged debris population would be to remove enough cross-sectional area and mass from densely populated orbits. According to the most recent NASA results, the active yearly removal of approximately 0.1% of the abandoned intact objects would be sufficient to stabilize the cataloged debris in LEO. The typical targets for removal would have masses between 500 and 1000 kg, for spacecraft, and of more than 1000 kg, for rocket upper stages. This paper investigates a space mission concept for active removal of abandoned Cosmos-3M second stages from LEO. The proposed concept relies on flying a multi-removal space platform carrying a number of Hybrid Propulsion Modules (HPMs). After capture, a HPM is installed on the debris, which is then de-orbited in a controlled fashion. The estimated mass of a single HPM results about 200 kg, making possible a multi-removal mission by means of a low-cost class-launcher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IADC Steering Group, “Space debris: IADC assessment report for 2010”, Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC), 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.-C. Liou, “An active debris removal parametric study for LEO environment remediation”, Advances in Space Research, Vol. 47, pp. 1865–1876, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. UNCOPUOS. “Space debris mitigation guidelines of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space”, A/62/20 (2007), Endorsed by the General Assembly Resolution A/RES/62/217, United Nations, New York, USA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. IADC Steering Group & Working Group 4, “Space debris mitigation guidelines”. IADC-02-01, rev. 1, Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC), 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Pardini, L. Anselmo, “Assessment of the consequences of the Fengyun-1C breakup in low Earth orbit”, Advances in Space Research, Vol. 44, pp. 545–557, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Pardini, L. Anselmo, “Physical properties and long-term evolution of the debris clouds produced by two catastrophic collisions in Earth orbit”, Advances in Space Research, Vol. 48, pp. 557–569, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Rossi, L. Anselmo, C. Pardini, G.B. Valsecchi, R. Jehn, “The new Space Debris Mitigation (SDM 4.0) long-term evolution code, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Space Debris, ESA SP-672, CDROM, European Space Agency, Noordwijk, The Netherland, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.-C. Liou, N-L. Johnson, “A sensitivity study of the effectiveness of active debris removal in LEO”, Acta Astronau-tica, Vol. 64, pp. 236–243, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.-C. Liou, N-L. Johnson, “Controlling the growth of future LEO debris populations with active debris removal”, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 66, pp. 236–243, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Burkhardt et al, “Evaluation of propulsion systems for satellite end of life de-orbiting”, AIAA Paper, AIAA-2002-4208, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L.T. DeLuca et al, “Active space debris removal by hybrid propulsion module”, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 91, pp. 20–33, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Accardo, G. Fasano, and M. Grassi, “Vision-based Relative Navigation”, Distributed Space Missions for Earth System, Monitoring. Space Technology Library, Vol. 31, pp. 267–305, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F. Branz et al, “Soft docking system for capture of irregularly shaped, uncontrolled space objects”, 6th European Conference on Space Debris, ESA/ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Tadini, F. Maggi, L.T. DeLuca, C. Pardini, L. Anselmo, M. Grassi, V. Trushlyakov. “Active Debris Removal of a Cosmos-3M second stage by Hybrid Rocket Module”, VIII International Science and Technology Conference “Dynamics of Systems, Mechanisms and Machines”, Omsk, Russian Federation, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Janovsky, M. Kassebom, H. Lubbersted and O. Romberg. “End-Of-Life De-Orbiting Strategies for Satellites”, Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress, DGLR-JT2002-028, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Altman, “Highlights in Hybrid Rocket Propulsion History”, The 10th International Workshop on Combustion and Propulsion, Lerici-La Spezia, Italy, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Gordon, B.J. McBride, “Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemical Equilibrium Composition and Applications I. Analysis”, NASA Reference Publications 1311, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M.J. Chiaverini, K.K. Kuo, “Fundamentals of Hybrid Rocket Combustion and Propulsion”, AIAA Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, Vol. 218, pp. 37–125, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeLuca, L.T., Lavagna, M., Maggi, F. et al. Large Debris Removal Mission in LEO based on Hybrid Propulsion. Aerotec. Missili Spaz. 93, 51–58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404676

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404676

Navigation