Skip to main content
Log in

An International Comparison of Cancer Survival: Advantage of Toronto’s Poor Over the Near Poor of Detroit

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Fehringer G, et al. An international comparison of cancer survival: Toronto, Ontario and Detroit, Michigan metropolitan areas. Am J Public Health 1997;87:1156–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. General Accounting Office. Cancer Survival: An International Comparison of Outcomes. Report to the Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Health, Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives. Gaithersburg, MD, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bank of Canada. Major financial and economic indicators: Analytic summary. Bank Canada Rev 1995;S6–S7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program: Public Use CD-ROM (1973-91). National Cancer Institute, DCPC, Surveillance Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Statistics Canada. Profiles of Census Tracts (1991) on Diskette (Toronto). Ottawa, ON: Minister of Supply and Services Canada, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population and Housing, 1990: Summary Tape File 3 on CD-ROM (Michigan). Washington, DC: Data User Services Division, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robles SC, Marrett LD, Clarke EA, Risch HA. An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:495–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schrijvers CTM, Coebergh JW, van der Heijden LH, Mackenbach JP. Socioeconomic variation in cancer survival in the Southeastern Netherlands, 1980–1989. Cancer 1995;75:2946–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Karjalainen S, Pukkala E. Social class as a prognostic factor in breast cancer survival. Cancer 1990;66:819–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miettinen OS. Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol 1976;103:226–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, Epstein AM. The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1993;329:326–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Braveman PA, Egerter S, Bennett T, Showstack J. Differences in hospital resource allocation among sick newborns according to insurance coverage. JAMA 1991;266: 3300–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenberg ER, Chute CG, Stukel T, et al. Social and economic factors in the choice of lung cancer treatment: A population-based study in two rural states. N Engl J Med 1988;318:612–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Katz SJ, Hofer TP, Manning WG. Hospital utilization in Ontario and the United States: The impact of socioeconomic status and health status. Can J Public Health 1996;87:253–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mandelblatt J, Andrews H, Kerner J, et al. Determinants of late stage diagnosis of breast and cervical cancer: The impact of age, race, social class, and hospital type. Am J Public Health 1991;81:646–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. Reverse targeting of preventive care due to lack of health insurance. JAMA 1988;259:2872–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yergan J, Flood AB, Diehr P, LoGerfo JP. Relationship between patient source of payment and the intensity of hospital services. Med Care 1988;26:1111–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant from the University of Windsor Research Board.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorey, K.M., Holowaty, E.J., Laukkanen, E. et al. An International Comparison of Cancer Survival: Advantage of Toronto’s Poor Over the Near Poor of Detroit. Can J Public Health 89, 102–104 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404398

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404398

Navigation