Skip to main content
Log in

Principles of Authorship in Health Promotion Research

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Public Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Hogg R. Trials and tribulations of multicenter studies. Lessons learned from the experiences of the Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group (SPNSG). Pediatric Nephrology 1991;5(3):348–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kassirer J, Angell M. On authorship and acknowledgements. New Engl J Med 1991;325:1510–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tri-Council Working Group. Code for Conduct of Research Involving Humans. Produced by the Medical Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Ottawa, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. White K, Dalgleish L. Authorship patterns in psychology: National and international trends. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1982;20(4):190–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zook A. Trend towards multiple authorship: Extension and update. J Counselling Psychol 1987;34(1):77–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Horton R, Smith R. Signing up for authorship. Lancet 1996;347(9004):780.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chase C. Does a newsletter editor get co authorship? Nurse Author & Editor 1995;5(2):8,9 Spring.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gajraj N, Nathanson M. Authorship in anaesthesia journals. Can J Anaesth 1995;12(8):749–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horton R, Smith R. Time to redefine authorship. BMJ 1996;312(7033):723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mason S, Haining S. Definition of authorship may be changed. Clinicians who enter patients into randomised controlled trials should be acknowledged. BMJ 1996;313(7060):821–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Steynberg S, Rossouw S. Multiple authorship in biomedical papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1995;46(6):468–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wager E. Redefining authorship. Drug industry is increasingly allowing employees to be named as authors [letter; comment]. BMJ 1996;312(7043):1423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. White B. Multiple authorship. Science 1997;275(5299):461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barker A, Powell R. Authorship. Guidelines exist on ownership of data and authorship in multicen-tre collaborations. BMJ 1997;314(7086):1046.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rose D. Signing up for authorship. Lancet 1996;347(9012):1412.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Davies H, Langley J, Speert D. Rating authors’ contributions to collaborative research: The PICNIC survey of university departments of pediatrics. Pediatric Investigators’ Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada. CMAJ 1996;155(7):877–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Halloran SP. Continuing medical education and gift authorship. BMJ 1995;310(6983):869–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Heinrich K. Co authorship: Turning pitfalls into pleasures. Nurse Author & Editor 1995;5(4):1–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamblet J. Ethical issues in publication. Seminars in Perioperative Nursing 1996;5(2):1027.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jackson D, Raftos M, Mannix J. Through the looking glass: Reflections on the authorship and content of current Australian nursing journals. Nursing Inquiry 1996;3(2):1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knight J. Multiple authorship (letter). Science 1992;275:461.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Parmley W. Authorship-taking the high road. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29(3):702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Phibbs C. The meaning of authorship. JAMA 1996;276(17):1385.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Room R. Ethics and journal publishing: Taking the debate forward. Evolving standards for authorship. Addiction 1995;90(10):1321–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Over R, Smallman S. Maintenance of individual visibility in publication of collaborative research by psychologists. Am Psychol 1973;28:161–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhopal R, Rankin J, McColl E, et al. Team approach to assigning authorship order is recommended. BMJ 1997;314(7086):1046–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cates W. Hierarchical authorship. JAMA 1995;273(2):115–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lundberg G, Glass R. What does authorship mean in a peer reviewed medical journal? JAMA 1996;276(1):75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sarcristan J, Hernandez J. Criteria for authorship. Acceptance of a paper should not depend on where the researchers work. BMJ 1995;310(6983):869.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Holmes F. Pondering authorship. Anesthesia 1996;50(10):916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Newman D. Writing together separately-critical discourse and the problems of cross-ethnic co-authorship. Area 1996;28(1):112.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fine M, Kurdek L. Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaboration. Am Psychol 1993;November:1141.

    Google Scholar 

  33. McCutchen C. Authorship disputes. Science 1995;270(5242):1557.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Melin G, Persson O. Studying research collaboration using coauthorships. Scientometrics 1996;36(3):363–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Foulkes W, Neylon N. Redefining authorship-relative contribution should be given after each authors name. BMJ 1996;312(7043):1423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Garfield E. Giving credit only where it is due. Scientist 1995;9(19):13.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Godlee F. Definition of “authorship” may be changed. BMJ 1996;312(7045):1501–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Leash E. Do we need to redefine authorship? Conference on authorship, University of Nottingham, UK, 6 June 1996. Oral Diseases 1996;2(3):244–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Leash E. Is it time for a new approach to authorship? J Dent Res 1997;76(3):724–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lundberg G. New requirements for authors: Signed statements of authorship responsibility and financial disclosure. JAMA 1989;262:2003–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mullee M, Lampe F, Pickering R, Julious S. Criteria for authorship. Statisticians should be co authors. BMJ 1995;310(6983):869.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Scott P, Smith T. Definition of authorship may be changed. Peer reviewers should be identified at end of each published paper. BMJ 1996;313(7060):821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Iammarino N, O’Rourke T, Pigg R, Weinberg A. Ethical issues in research and publication. J School Health 1989;59(3):101–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. American College Personnel Association. Statement of ethical professional standards. J College Student Personnel 1981;22:184–89.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nativio D. Authorship. International Academy of Nursing Editors. J Cultural Diversity 1995;2(3):93–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Oliver M. Al, or the anonymity of authorship. Lancet 1995;345(8951):668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Van der Kloot W, Willemsen T. Authorship and the order of authorship: Academic psychologists’ assessments of the usefulness of contributions to a research project. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden 1991;46(8):368–78.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Spiegel D, Keith-Spiegel P. Assignment of publication credits: Ethics and practices of psychologists. Am Psychol 1970;25:738–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bridgewater C, Bornstein P, Walkenbach J. Ethical issues in the assignment of authorship credit. Am Psychol 1981;36:524–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Winston R. A suggested procedure for determining order of authorship in research publications. J Counselling and Development 1985;63:515–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Werley H, Murphy P, Gosch S, et al. Research publication credit assignment: Nurses’ views. Res Nursing & Health 1981;4(2):261–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Endersby J. Collaborative research in the social sciences-multiple authorship and publication credit. Soc Sci Q 1996;77(2):375–92.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gladding S. Multiple authorship in the Personnel and Guidance Journal: A 12 year study. Personnel and Guidance J 1984;62:628–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention. Publication Policy. Stanford, CA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hopfield J. Authorship-truth in labelling. Science 1997;275(5305):1403–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Keats T. On multiple authorship. Skeletal Radiology 1996;25(1):1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mendenhall M, Higbee K. Recent trends in multiple authorship in psychology. Psychol Rep 1982;51(3, Pt 1):1019–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shapiro D, Wenger N, Shapiro M. The contribution of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. JAMA 1994;271(6):438–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Shulkin D, Goin J, Rennie D. Patterns of authorship among chairmen of departments of medicine. Acad Med 1996;68(9):688–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Smith R. Authorship: Time for a paradigm shift. BMJ 1992;314:997.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Fotion N, Conrad C. Authorship and other credits. Ann Int Med 1984;100(4):592–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bohpal R, Rankin J, McColl E, et al. The vexed question of authorship: Views of researchers in a British medical facility. BMJ 1997;314:1009–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Goodman N. Pondering authorship. Anaesthesia 1995;485–87.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Goodman N. Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical research. BMJ 1994;309:1482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Rennie D, Flanagin A. Authorship Authorship!: Guests, Ghosts, Grafters and the Two-Sided Coin. JAMA 1994;271(6):469–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Squires B. Authors: Who contributes what? CMAJ 1996;55(7):897–98.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Fields K, Price A. Problems in research integrity arising from misconceptions about the ownership of research. Acad Med 1993;68(9 Suppl):S60–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Fields C. Professors’ demands for credit as coauthors of student papers may be rising. Chronicle of Higher Education 1983;7:10.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Dowd S, Schulz D. Responsible dissemination of scholarly work in radiology. Radiologic Technology 1996;67(5):407–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Slone R. Coauthors’ contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved coauthorship. Am J Roentgenology 1996;167(3):571–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Huth E. Guidelines on authorship of medical papers. Ann Int Med 1986;104:269–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Huth E. How to Write and Publish Papers in the Medical Sciences. New York: Williams & Wilkins, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  73. British Medical Journal. Instructions to authors. BMJ 1994;308:39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Friedman P. Standards for authorship and publication in academic radiology. Radiology 1993;189:33–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA 1997;227(11):927–34.

    Google Scholar 

  76. American Psychological Association. Publication Guidelines. Washington, DC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Costa M, Gatz M. Determination of authorship credit in published dissertations. Psychological Science 1992;3(6):354–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. DiGuisto E. Equity in authorship: A strategy for assigning credit when publishing. Soc Sci Med 1994;38:55–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Jones S. Determination of authorship credits. Psychological Science 1993;4(4):271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Schmidt R. A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. Bulletin of Ecological Sociology of America 1987;68:8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Shwachuck C, Fatis M. Practical guide to assignment of authorship credit. Behaviour Therapist 1986;9(10):216–17.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Simon J. A plan to improve the attribution of scholarly articles. American Sociologist 1970;November:265–67.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Riesenberg D, Lundberg G. The order of authorship: WhO’s on first? JAMA 1990;264(14):1857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. National Cancer Institute. NCI Diffusion Project: Smart Choices, Publication Guidelines. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  85. University of Texas. Policy: Authorship and Acknowledgment. Health Sciences Center, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Green L, George A, Daniel M, et al. Participatory Research in Health Promotion. Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. James Frankish PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frankish, C.J. Principles of Authorship in Health Promotion Research. Can J Public Health 89, 81–84 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404393

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404393

Navigation